lol thats awesome,
the thing is, they can't ditch 1914, its impossible. I found when i argued 1914 the major flaw that the society had printed that in 607 the temple was destroyed. If they just said that jerusulem was invaded..or in 609 that the area around were perhaps surrounded..anything to this effect they would be safer. However even astute Jehovah's Witnesses are suprised to see that in 607 it says that the temple was destroyed. It would be so much easier if Russel claimed that in 607 the area was now being ruled by some sort of Babylonian rule than maybe there prophecy would have some merrit since it is historically proven that it was indeed surrounded in 609 BCE in which 607 would not be far off. However they base there chronology off of the "destruction of the temple" in 607 BCE which is obvoiously historically inaccurate since it happend 20 years later. This is one thing that they will always use as, Jehovah knows more than humans, and will eventually be proven accurate. If perhaps one day they change their reasoning to rulership instead of destruction of the temple in 607 they would be better off. I hope so, I hope you are one day 100% right. Sorry for blabbing