jeeprube

Joined

• started 110 topics
• posted 1,797 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by jeeprube

• 
  43

  proof that the NT likely was first written in Hebrew

  by Spike Tassel in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  http://www.search-the-scriptures.org/hebrew_new_testament.htm.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  jeeprube

  on all of this Topic, I see no "WT dogma" in any of my statements

  Even though your line of reasoning follows the WT's exactly?
• 
  43

  proof that the NT likely was first written in Hebrew

  by Spike Tassel in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  http://www.search-the-scriptures.org/hebrew_new_testament.htm.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  jeeprube

  Spike I must say, you have the intellectual ability of a Jehovah's Witness!
• 
  43

  proof that the NT likely was first written in Hebrew

  by Spike Tassel in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  http://www.search-the-scriptures.org/hebrew_new_testament.htm.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  jeeprube

  The contributors draw from their own spirits, whether ultimately from Jehovah or Satan, or a mix of both.

  So the "contributors" as you call them can be inspired by Satan?
• 
  43

  proof that the NT likely was first written in Hebrew

  by Spike Tassel in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  http://www.search-the-scriptures.org/hebrew_new_testament.htm.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  jeeprube

  607 BCE is not how anyone at the time would have spoken of it, for starters. Actually, anything BCE is historically anachronistic.

  So? The fact is that the entire teaching scheme of the WT relies on 607 BCE, and IT IS THE WRONG DATE! I mean talk about having egg on your face!

  SO back to your theory of logical reasoning... If your date is proven wrong, how can you continue to put forth the teachings based upon it as truth? Doesn't that violate logic?
• 
  163

  Is God's name absent in the Christian Scriptures?

  by Spike Tassel in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  perhaps this article will help you know for yourself: http://www.tetragrammaton.org/godsnameabsent.htm.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  jeeprube

  The only thing that's clear in this entire argument is that the GB of JW's added to the scriptures when they "translated" their NWT. You can attempt to convulute the issue all you want, yet Jesus gave clear warnings about adding to the scriptures.

  In this manner the GB places themselves above Jesus. If God wanted the tetragrammaton placed in the Greek writings that constitute the NT, then I'm sure it would be so. He didn't need to wait for 12 wrinkled old men to do it for him!
• 
  43

  proof that the NT likely was first written in Hebrew

  by Spike Tassel in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  http://www.search-the-scriptures.org/hebrew_new_testament.htm.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  jeeprube

  The New Testament was written in Greek, and was completed about 40 years after Jesus lived. It was written by men who either knew Jesus personally or were His early followers.

  That's a quote from tetragrammaton.com that ST cited on his other thread trying to prove the NT actually did contain the Hebrew word for God.

  Oh man, this is too easy. I gotto go back to arguing politics. Where's Burnsy at?
• 
  43

  proof that the NT likely was first written in Hebrew

  by Spike Tassel in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  http://www.search-the-scriptures.org/hebrew_new_testament.htm.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  jeeprube

  Jehovah constitutes the acceptable Source, plain and simple.

  Really? Does Jehovah write all the publications the WTBT Corporation prints every year? Who is the source of that?
• 
  43

  proof that the NT likely was first written in Hebrew

  by Spike Tassel in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  http://www.search-the-scriptures.org/hebrew_new_testament.htm.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  jeeprube

  logic is how reasoning is done

  Umm, very astute. I would humbly submit that the rules of logical reasoning require us to disregard evidence that is proven to be unfactual.

  For example if I had a theory about dates, and the end of the world which lead me to determine a specific date like....and I'll just pull a number out of the air here.....1914. And let's say I needed a hard date from antiquity to base this on like 607 B.C.E. yet ALL historical evidence proved that my claims of a major event happening on 607 were wrong, and that event actually happened in like 534 BCE or something then wouldn't the laws of logical reasoning dictate I throw out my original date and interpretations and admit I was wrong?

  What would it say about my "logical reasoning" abilities if I clung to my original assertion even though all historical evidence proved it wrong ST?
• 
  43

  proof that the NT likely was first written in Hebrew

  by Spike Tassel in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  http://www.search-the-scriptures.org/hebrew_new_testament.htm.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  jeeprube

  But the evidences that yield that conclusion are wholly insufficient to warrant the additional conclusion that the New Testament was first written in Hebrew.

  That is the concluding statement to the second internet link you cite. It would appear that your own source disagrees with your thesis.
• 
  43

  proof that the NT likely was first written in Hebrew

  by Spike Tassel in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  http://www.search-the-scriptures.org/hebrew_new_testament.htm.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  jeeprube

  Here's the source of your first link:

  “Search the Scriptures” Ministry

  PO Box32

  Clarksville, AR 72830-0032 USA

  Are we to assume that since you are promoting their article on the NT being written in Hebrew that you therefore accept all other teachings they may espouse? Who is the articles author? Where did he/she go to school? What credentials do they have? How many years have they studied biblical history, archeology, Greek, Hebrew, etc?