Mandatory reporting of child abuse?
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-28231675
Be interesting to see how the WT applies the 'two witness rule' to this...
mandatory reporting of child abuse?.
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-28231675.
be interesting to see how the wt applies the 'two witness rule' to this....
Mandatory reporting of child abuse?
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-28231675
Be interesting to see how the WT applies the 'two witness rule' to this...
awful presenter, but worth watching if only for the jw.org badge on the jw pr guy.
note his tie is the same colour... :.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7eob8cirbaw.
Awful presenter, but worth watching if only for the JW.Org badge on the JW PR guy. Note his tie is the same colour... :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EoB8CirBAw
People saved for years for this? How very, very sad.
was listening to bbc radio 4 late sunday night, and in a programme about migration, they referenced the "babylonian conquest of jerusalem in 607 b.c.
" which caught my attention.. did they not mean 587 b.c., or did i understand it wrong?.
the link to the programme is below - sorry if you're not in the u.k. as you probably won't be able to listen to bbc programmes.
on Google there are about 100,000 references each to Jerusalem and 586 or 587
there are about 2,000,000 references to 607
Gah!
was listening to bbc radio 4 late sunday night, and in a programme about migration, they referenced the "babylonian conquest of jerusalem in 607 b.c.
" which caught my attention.. did they not mean 587 b.c., or did i understand it wrong?.
the link to the programme is below - sorry if you're not in the u.k. as you probably won't be able to listen to bbc programmes.
I doubt they looked at an old source, why would they? We'd be talking about a book from the 19th century!
Either someone got it from JW literature or from a pro-JW site. No one else talks about 607.
All historians site 586/587BC or 587BC as the correct date for the fall of Jerusalem. And all historical/Wiki websites do the same.
was listening to bbc radio 4 late sunday night, and in a programme about migration, they referenced the "babylonian conquest of jerusalem in 607 b.c.
" which caught my attention.. did they not mean 587 b.c., or did i understand it wrong?.
the link to the programme is below - sorry if you're not in the u.k. as you probably won't be able to listen to bbc programmes.
Thanks Searcher.
Have posted that link on JWR (credited to your good self) on a thread I've started there on this nonsense.
was listening to bbc radio 4 late sunday night, and in a programme about migration, they referenced the "babylonian conquest of jerusalem in 607 b.c.
" which caught my attention.. did they not mean 587 b.c., or did i understand it wrong?.
the link to the programme is below - sorry if you're not in the u.k. as you probably won't be able to listen to bbc programmes.
I have it as an MP3. How do I upload the section?
You could use SoundCloud:
Then post the link here.
was listening to bbc radio 4 late sunday night, and in a programme about migration, they referenced the "babylonian conquest of jerusalem in 607 b.c.
" which caught my attention.. did they not mean 587 b.c., or did i understand it wrong?.
the link to the programme is below - sorry if you're not in the u.k. as you probably won't be able to listen to bbc programmes.
Clicking on Show more it states:
Producer: David Prest and Gil Percival
A Whistledown production for BBC Radio 4
But as they made this for BBC Radio 4, the form linked below probably is the best way of raising this:
https://ssl.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006slnx/contact
I'm going to drop them a polite message and ask that they to broadcast a correction. This is the problem when a publishing house like the Watchtower prints made up history to support its doctrine - it can end up in the mainstream. The BBC is a public service broadcaster so it is vital they get subjects like history correct and need to be held to account when they don't.
Unbelievable.
was listening to bbc radio 4 late sunday night, and in a programme about migration, they referenced the "babylonian conquest of jerusalem in 607 b.c.
" which caught my attention.. did they not mean 587 b.c., or did i understand it wrong?.
the link to the programme is below - sorry if you're not in the u.k. as you probably won't be able to listen to bbc programmes.
Good grief!
You are absolutely right.
Ok - I'm off to find out which muppets made this.
http://gotoby.com/news/article/2245/watchtower-buys-former-faa-training-facility-in-palm-coast-for-$7025000.
watchtower buys former faa training facility in palm coast for $7,025,000the facility was owned by embry riddle and had been leased to the faa.
watchtower plans to use the facility in much the same manner as did the faa.by toby tobinadd a comment palm coast, fl june 30, 2014 watchtower, an entity ofjehovahs witnesses, purchased the former faa training facility in palm coast from embry riddle aeronautical university for $7,025,000.
Sales brochure:
http://www.showcase.com/property/4500-Palm-Coast-Parkway-SE/Palm-Coast/Florida/9289900
So they got nearly a $0.5M discount.
And it has a nice swimming pool too!
All together now... Foxes have dens and birds have nests, but the Son of Man has no place to lay his head...
"the earth is suspended in empty space.
(job 26:7) many ancient peoples believed that the world was a flat disk supported by a giant or an animal, such as a buffalo or a turtle.".
http://www.jw.org/en/bible-teachings/questions/science-and-the-bible/.
On a different but related point, the WT likes to suggest that Isaiah 40:22 says:
There is One who dwells above the circle* of the earth,
The * states 'or "sphere"'. Problem is, that the hebrew word for sphere is dur: http://biblehub.com/hebrew/1754.htm
But the Hebrew word for circle is chug: http://biblehub.com/hebrew/chug_2329.htm
As in a compass circle, or the circle of a camp. Something more like a disc.
Another WT myth exposed!