???He said awaken from not awaken in, you halfwit.???
That is what I am talking bout. When one becomes a true Christian, he awakens from Satan's world to a life of walking in God's light.
If God is for us, who can be against us?
Comforter
???He said awaken from not awaken in, you halfwit.???
That is what I am talking bout. When one becomes a true Christian, he awakens from Satan's world to a life of walking in God's light.
If God is for us, who can be against us?
Comforter
???i guess i'm a bit confused. why are you on here whining about explicit content and making it sound like bad association? wasn't it your choice to read and post on this site? did someone put a gun to YOUR head and make you do it????
It was my choice to read this site. But I thought it was a board for discussion about jw, not a board about the benefits of oral sex.
???as i recall (i haven't been out THAT long) there were numerous warnings at meeting and assemblies regarding the internet and chat/posting websites. i do remember specifically to be a 'good, true christian' you woulnd't be visiting them anyway.???
The elders are not masters over our faith. We must use our powers of perception to tell good from bad. I thought I would come to this site to offer comfort to the wayward sheep in this place. But the dividends that might come from comforting sheep in this place are negated by the losses this place brings to one's spirituality.
???don't turn your own problems and insecurities around on us. be an adult, grow up, and take responsibility for your own actions.???
I am. That is why I will be spending little or no time comforting sheep in this place. Thanks for the wise advice.
Comforter
I am directing my words toward everyone who has said something in this thread. But to Cyrano specifically:
???Typical JW response. When they can't defend any of their ridiculous doctrines without getting crushed they have to resort to some lame excuse to leave in order to save face.???
I am not making lame excuses. I believe that a Christian should think on that which is holy, clean, and chaste. Things presented in this place do not fit any of that criteria. The Bible also warns Jehovah's people about being contaminated by unclean influences. If one hears filth all the time, he will eventually digest the filth and become filthy. A man is the product of what his mind feeds on.
???Tell me comforter, is it too uncomfortable to learn your whole world is really nothing more than make-believe????
It is uncomfortable to be cussed out frequently, hear about oral sex constantly, hear explicit and unclean talk about penises all the time. I would much rather feed off of God's holy Bible.
???How long will it take before you finally awaken from the twilight zone????
I awoke when I became a Witness.
Bye
Comforter
I have decided to spend less time on this board because of its explicit content. I could take the time to wipe the floor with AlanF who knows next to nothing about the papacy. But we have decided to spare poor Alan this time.
This board is not an upbuilding place for true Christians. Too much talk about sex and the male organ. Time would be better spent going out in the ministry or studying God's word daily. I also notice that there is now talk about the possibility of terrorist action being carried out by ex-jws. But if you think such threats are going to deter jws from doing what is right, you got another thing coming. God is on our side and we will prevail. Get ready cause the end is coming. It will catch those who sleep unawares.
I will check in on this board from time to time to see if the environment in this place has gotten any better. I know you folks all need comfort through discomfort.
ex-jws in this place often berate the gerontological state of the governing body.
the speak abusively about the oold men in brooklyn.
why the antipathos against the men in brooklyn?
???Since you say the Leo Greenless incident may NOT have happened, please prove that it did NOT. THEN Explain why the society will not comment on the matter.???
Are you kidding? You expect me to prove Greenlees did not molest a child and then get shifted around? You cannot prove a negative. That is like asking me to prove that I did not eat a hamburger last night. How does one go about proving that he did not eat a bite of food 16 hours ago?
i just had two nice jw women knock on my door...i invited them in and listened to their brief presentation and accepted the watchtower and awake.
they couldn't stay(had a bible study they had to go on)so they said they will be back tomorrow...i am playing the naive daughter of jw parents of whom i have had debates with in regards to jw doctrines...that way i don't seem to be totally oblivious to their teachings, yet not an "evil apostate"!.
i was taken off guard, so i am glad they are coming back....any suggestions on how to approach these two women without blowing my cover?
Ask them for a Bible study.
ex-jws in this place often berate the gerontological state of the governing body.
the speak abusively about the oold men in brooklyn.
why the antipathos against the men in brooklyn?
???I do not believe I owe them ANY amount of respect - they have not earned it, and they have not shown it to their "flock"
Matthew 23:11-13 He who is greatest among you shall be your servant; whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted. "But woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because you shut the kingdom of heaven against men; for you neither enter yourselves, nor allow those who would enter to go in.
???
You might remember that Jesus also encouraged people to listen and do what the Pharisees said, even though they were hypocritical. Jesus said that the Pharisees taught what was proper but did not act in harmony with what they told others to do. So I am not sure sure that Jesus would have picked on some old Pharisee about his gastric disorder. He would have at least shown respect for the Pharisee's age.
Thanks for the compassion.
ex-jws in this place often berate the gerontological state of the governing body.
the speak abusively about the oold men in brooklyn.
why the antipathos against the men in brooklyn?
???: If what you say really happened, it would be disguting.
Ooh, a crack in the troll's armor, dare I say????
You might dare to say it, but it ain't so.
???: But seeing that you are a shameless purveyor of gossip, I don't believe a word you say.
Then call the Society and ask specifically about it. Then report back here. But I already know what you'll find, if you have enough guts -- which you don't -- to do it: They would tell you "no comment" or the equivalent. They will not deny it because they know that if they do, then if the truth comes out unequivocally in the future -- and it will! -- then they will have been caught in yet another lie.???
You know good and well what the response would be if I called the Society and asked about Brother Greenlees. But I do not feel compelled to call the Society at all, considering that you are the one launching accusations against Greenlees. The burden of proof is therefore on you. Can you produce any credible evidence that Greenless was moved and set up as a pioneer because of molesting a child?
???:: The troll actually manages to condemn the entire Watchtower leadership, not just the Governing Body, by admitting that the younger men who comprise the rest of the leadership have equal responsibility with the GB for aiding and abetting the covering up of child molestation and the punishment and threat of punishment for victims.
: Talk about twisting one's comments.
It's not my problem that you're too stupid to understand what you've done.???
I did not "do" anything. You simply chose to reword what I wrote. But that is typical behavior for anti-jw polemicists.
???:: Very soon there will be put on certain news programs the fact that the GB ordered certain of its henchmen to threaten certain victims into keeping silent. The GB and its vile practices will be on display before the world, and the world will judge them to be as reprehensible as the leaders of the Catholic Church.
: That will happen when Sheol flames up, fraudbacker. LOL.
You think there'll be an explosion in hell this year then, Booby? Are you making yet another prediction????
No predictions, fraudbacker, since Jesus said no one knows the day and hour. But I would not bet on Sheol being lit or exploding anytime soon. LOL.
???:: As for the aged Pope, he certainly does not determine Church policy to the same extent as the Governing Body determines JW policy.
: This statement shows how little you know about the church's curia. The buck stops with the papacy in the catholic church. Study church government in the catholic church.
The buck stops with the Pope and the GB alright. But the Pope is not put on the same pedestal as the GB is by the men who are under them.???
The governing body is not considered infallible; the pope is. The governing body is not the final authority in doctrinal matters. The magisterium is the final authority in the catholic church. How you can make the statements you did with a straight face is beyond me.
???In practice, the Church has enough sense not to think that the Pope was put in his place directly by God.???
Maybe you need to talk about a subject you are familiar with since you know next to nothing about catholic church governance. The pope's roots go back to Peter who was supposedly appointed by Jesus Christ (God the Son) himself. Go back and study catholic church history.
???Bethel leaders have this albatross of "passing the mantle" to deal with. Today, Ted Jaracz, aka "The Boss", wears that mantle and so the weenies below him who know what a scumbag he is refuse to act. Perhaps the adverse publicity now haunting the Society will light a fire under them.???
No one passes the mantle better than the catholic church. If Jaracz does "take up the mantle" you can rest assure that his authority will be nowhere near the pope's. We technically have no leaders. Jaracz and other governing body members are just slaves of God.
???:: Church policy is determined more democratically, as is shown by the fact that American bishops are presently being called on to vote on molestation policy changes. Thus, the responsiblity for Church policy is spread around among young and old Church officials, whereas JW policy is determined strictly by the GB. Thus, it is entirely the fault of ancient, ossified thinkers in JW leadership when JW policies on any front are wrong, and attributing their bad thinking to age is perfectly reasonable.
: Jw follow example of first century congregation.
Bullshit.???
Please do not call yourself names.
???:It was not a democracy.
Actually it was run a good deal more like the Church is than how the Society is run. That "apostolic council" in Jerusalem that ruled on circumcision and other matters was attended by lots of "low level" Christians, not just by those the Society misrepresents as a 1st-century "governing body". All of the attendees had input to the decisions. The JW Governing Body meets in secret and issues rulings little to no regard for what "low level" JWs think. In fact, if a low-level JW has the temerity to offer an opinion, he'll be told to shut up or be disfellowshipped.???
You have no knowledge of what the word governing body means. You are way out of your element here. Exactly what low-level Christians attended the first century governing body meetings in Jerusalem?
And your suggestion about a jw being df is simplistic, to say the least.
???I think there's something to be said for stability, as opposed to the Keystone Kops methods of governing used by the JW leadership. Every few decades they try something new -- always with divine direction, of course.???
Now you are defending the catholic church over against jw. My how you have slipped, fraudbacker. You praise a church for continuing to do the wrong thing for hundreds of years? Give us a break. The church wrongly teaches that God is triune, that he burns people in hell, he predestinates human actions, we should venerate Mary and a host of other errors. Be my guest in praising such falsity.
???: LOL. Even if the gb's "Errors" could be attributed to age, why would anyone pick on the gb because of age?
No reasonable person picks on them because of their age. These men are criticized because of their bad, unchristian, self-serving and amazingly stupid decisions. The fact that they are ancient and therefore have ossified brains explains why their decisions are so bad. I mean, one would be hard put to figure out a worse set of decisions than they've made over the last year and a half with respect to dealing with the adverse publicity about molestation.???
I haven't heard many in this place criticize the ossified brains of the governing body. They choose to pick on gastric problems and problems with the chewing of steak. What do those things have to do with ossified brains and bad decisions?
???No one really knows what any specific set of leaders would do. But the odds are that they wouldn't consistently make the very worst decisions that could be made. Younger men tend to be somewhat less arrogant than the old geezers who have been bowed down to for decades and have become overconfident that they are not to be questioned.???
You must have never read the Bible and you know next to nothing about human nature. LOL. Young guys can be as arrogant as the next man. Plus they are inexperienced. Most guys become humbler as they get older because they realize what fools we mortals be.
???: Younger folks may not suffer from ossification but they often suffer from another syndrome. Manure filled diapers that they are not able to change.
Why would they do that? They have sisters in Bethel who do that for the GB.???
The governing body may have literal manure in their pants because of age but young ones often have figurative manure because they are immature. They have not seen the world and know hardly anything about life and serving God. Wisdom mainly resides in those of advanced years.
ex-jws in this place often berate the gerontological state of the governing body.
the speak abusively about the oold men in brooklyn.
why the antipathos against the men in brooklyn?
???Let's see... If I negatively disrespect someone does that mean that I positively respect them? Wait... another thought, maybe if I negatively disrespect someone I just respect them????
It all depends on what you mean by "negative." What I mean is "consisting of negation" or a privation. So negative respect means to respect someone by negating harmful behavior towards that person. Positive respect means to show respect by active deeds and not just by witholding harm.
I know you got it now.
AF
???The troll speaks of the disgusting practice of moving molesting priests from parish to parish. Yet that is exactly what the Governing Body did with the child-raper and GB member Leo Greenlees in 1984. The troll inadvertantly condemns the very Governing Body it worships. Further, the silentlambs webpage contains dozens of stories where an abusing elder got a slap on the wrist and was merely moved to another congregation. Yet we hear no complaints about this from our troll.???
If what you say really happened, it would be disguting. But seeing that you are a shameless purveyor of gossip, I don't believe a word you say.
???The troll actually manages to condemn the entire Watchtower leadership, not just the Governing Body, by admitting that the younger men who comprise the rest of the leadership have equal responsibility with the GB for aiding and abetting the covering up of child molestation and the punishment and threat of punishment for victims.???
Talk about twisting one's comments.
???Very soon there will be put on certain news programs the fact that the GB ordered certain of its henchmen to threaten certain victims into keeping silent. The GB and its vile practices will be on display before the world, and the world will judge them to be as reprehensible as the leaders of the Catholic Church.???
That will happen when Sheol flames up, fraudbacker. LOL.
???As for the aged Pope, he certainly does not determine Church policy to the same extent as the Governing Body determines JW policy.???
This statement shows how little you know about the church's curia. The buck stops with the papacy in the catholic church. Study church government in the catholic church.
???Church policy is determined more democratically, as is shown by the fact that American bishops are presently being called on to vote on molestation policy changes. Thus, the responsiblity for Church policy is spread around among young and old Church officials, whereas JW policy is determined strictly by the GB. Thus, it is entirely the fault of ancient, ossified thinkers in JW leadership when JW policies on any front are wrong, and attributing their bad thinking to age is perfectly reasonable.???
Jw follow example of first century congregation. It was not a democracy. And though the catholic church has younger ones in the mix when it makes decisions, the church has hardly changed in all the years of its existence. LOL. Even if the gb's "Errors" could be attributed to age, why would anyone pick on the gb because of age?
???As for castigating the Governing Body for their disgusting policies without reference to their age, that's extremely easy to do, and I have certainly done so in spades. But understanding that ossified thinking due to old age plays its part in the reasons for some JW policies is valuable. A younger leadership would not make the same mistakes.???
You do not know what a younger leadership with do. Younger folks may not suffer from ossification but they often suffer from another syndrome. Manure filled diapers that they are not able to change. Besides, the gb does consider the input of younger members in the organisation. You just failt to acknowledge the fact.
ex-jws in this place often berate the gerontological state of the governing body.
the speak abusively about the oold men in brooklyn.
why the antipathos against the men in brooklyn?
???Ehhh....as a display of honesty and integrity.???
I have not admitted to using other names in this place. So I think this topic is a non issue. But what I find perplexing about the whole matter is that no ex-jw in this place are asked to reveal what names they have had in the past or now have. I believe in fair treatment for all.
???So the Board could assess what type of person you are and what motivates your nonsensical posts.???
My initial post was serious. I think it is a shame that people on this board insult old people, jw or not. They need to have more respect for the elderly. That is not nonsensical. As for what type of person I am, I do not think that people can discern my character by a few posts. Human beingness is a inexhaustible mystery characterized by the numinous nature of Da-sein. Man is hidden man instead of revealed man. So just let others judge me by my words. If they want to talk, then fine. But if you think I am a waste of time, avoid me. I will go away.
???So that people would not waste time corresponding with persons whose agenda is not to debate but to debase.???
I have no desire to debase anyone except for AF and Farkel.
???So that the thousands of JW lurkers who visit this site with geniune doubts, looking for an expansion of knowledge and truth, can see that you all are about mischief, regardless of your slippery attempts to convince otherwise.???
I am not all about mischief. I can assure you of that. So there is no need to answer your question.
???Need I go on...?
Well one thing is for sure. You are not You Know, not intelligent enought, you are not Friday, not intelligent enough, you are not DunsScott, not intelligent enough...lol..Do you see a pattern emerging here.???
I think.
???Please be honest enough to admit to the Board which identities you own on this Board, then let them judge your motives publicly.???
I don't own any identities on this board. They will have to judge my motives on the basis of my posts under the name that I am using at this moment.