Freemindfade Sorry but it seems the historians are wrong
yeah... you are right, that sounds logical...
it really is great.
i remember browsing this forum the day after i had joined it, and their was a knock on the door.
i thought it was one of my package from ups but instead it was two sisters.
Freemindfade Sorry but it seems the historians are wrong
yeah... you are right, that sounds logical...
it really is great.
i remember browsing this forum the day after i had joined it, and their was a knock on the door.
i thought it was one of my package from ups but instead it was two sisters.
Besides there are more civilizations that invalidate the flood besides just Egypt, which despite your fundie bible thumper links, still does a pretty damn good job
it really is great.
i remember browsing this forum the day after i had joined it, and their was a knock on the door.
i thought it was one of my package from ups but instead it was two sisters.
More crap, you only reference people using eisegesis and not exegesis.
Accepting traditional Egyptian chronology necessitates rejection of biblical truth. Accepting biblical chronology allows a reconstruction of ancient chronology on a foundation of truth. Viewing the evidence from a biblical framework makes the histories of Egypt and the Old Testament fit together like two sides of a zipper.
it really is great.
i remember browsing this forum the day after i had joined it, and their was a knock on the door.
i thought it was one of my package from ups but instead it was two sisters.
Dude that link is rubbish, the flood didn't predate the pyramids because they weren't damaged? that is not proof lmao. That whole blurb was complete and utter nonsense, did you even read it? or just find a random link online and post it? For all the cockamamy reasons I've heard apologists try to prove the flood that is by far one of the weakest. It's essentially saying it's true because...bible says so. That guy that wrote that blog is far from any kind of expert
it really is great.
i remember browsing this forum the day after i had joined it, and their was a knock on the door.
i thought it was one of my package from ups but instead it was two sisters.
Jehalapeno is sad...
it really is great.
i remember browsing this forum the day after i had joined it, and their was a knock on the door.
i thought it was one of my package from ups but instead it was two sisters.
This guy is googling and jworging links and copy pasting as fast as he can without doing any real research
You have not shown me where the BIBLE condemns slavery or rape as immoral: Fail
You have not shown me with the BIBLE how 144k is literal, in fact you showed how silly it is by trying to included :9 which means we have to consider 5-8: Fail
it really is great.
i remember browsing this forum the day after i had joined it, and their was a knock on the door.
i thought it was one of my package from ups but instead it was two sisters.
So literal people from the tribe of Gad? of Judah? lmfao seriously dude?
And pasting a link to JW.borg doesn't prove to me from the bible that slavery is condemned or rape. Morally condemned, think about that for a minute. In the OT you rape someone's daughter it's not considered a moral problem, it's considered you damaged her owner (fathers) property, now you have to pay him money and marry her.
it really is great.
i remember browsing this forum the day after i had joined it, and their was a knock on the door.
i thought it was one of my package from ups but instead it was two sisters.
Also I said prove it scripturally, the fact that 7:4 uses a definite (144,000) and 7:9 uses indefinite (great crowd) proves dick. What about the definite numbers in 7:5-8
From the tribe of Judah 12,000 were sealed,
from the tribe of Reuben 12,000,
from the tribe of Gad 12,000,
6 from the tribe of Asher 12,000,
from the tribe of Naphtali 12,000,
from the tribe of Manasseh 12,000,
7 from the tribe of Simeon 12,000,
from the tribe of Levi 12,000,
from the tribe of Issachar 12,000,
8 from the tribe of Zebulun 12,000,
from the tribe of Joseph 12,000,
from the tribe of Benjamin 12,000.
144,000 is supposedly literal and these are all symbolic, these scriptures in between the ones your "scholars" cherry picked blow their "logic" away. Lots of "definite" numbers in revelation are considered symbolic by JWS,
try again... I'll be waiting
it really is great.
i remember browsing this forum the day after i had joined it, and their was a knock on the door.
i thought it was one of my package from ups but instead it was two sisters.
from the tribes of Israel
having the name of Lamb and Father on their foreheads
virgins
holding no falsehood on their mouths
without blemish
All these are not literal??? But they refer to a literal 144,000????
it really is great.
i remember browsing this forum the day after i had joined it, and their was a knock on the door.
i thought it was one of my package from ups but instead it was two sisters.
...And I heard the number of those who were sealed, a hundred and forty-four thousand, sealed out of every tribe of the sons of Israel." Wouldn't that literally be out of Israel then???