so i was fooled by the witnesses.
what can i learn from that?
not to accept things at face value but to seek out opinion and different view points.. hence my question " do you believe man landed on the moon?.
oooooohhhh I was too lazy Viv, and I felt like provoking you for once, I know how it turns some people on so I am just doing them a favor
The 1951 film the day earth stood still has a pretty sick ufo fly by of the white house and landing on the lawn and it looks pretty damn good for 19 effing 51 ahahaha
And my stance is I am a skeptic of all... just having fun, ok ... go ahead... let me have it
so i was fooled by the witnesses.
what can i learn from that?
not to accept things at face value but to seek out opinion and different view points.. hence my question " do you believe man landed on the moon?.
Wait cappy let me play devils/constheorist advocate. (and I love the video by the way, but I have to stir the conspiracy soup for my amusement).
The moon landing was in 1969
A piece of CIA technology was introduced in 1965, the SR71, staggering to think this aircraft was probably started sometime in the late 50's only a decade after propped war planes. It was a spy plane owned by the CIA.
What if the CIA (aka NASA) had advanced filmography tech??? The military has always had far advanced tech, even in film I would wager.
His reference is to civilian film making technology of the time. Ok done stirring the pot, for the record I like the video and I think he is right. for the record!
I will always feel suspect though in the back of my mind...
Moon-landing = Technological Jesus
so i was fooled by the witnesses.
what can i learn from that?
not to accept things at face value but to seek out opinion and different view points.. hence my question " do you believe man landed on the moon?.
recently, several threads have had some debate about logic, evidence, critical thinking and skepticism.
i wanted to write a post discussing those things, hopefully to clarify what those things are, why they are important and how to use those tools.
first, logic, at its core, is simply a method for how to reason validly, how to draw conclusions based on a premise.
I disagree!!!!
Juuuuusssstt kidddddinng
so i was fooled by the witnesses.
what can i learn from that?
not to accept things at face value but to seek out opinion and different view points.. hence my question " do you believe man landed on the moon?.
I've been to the moon and I challenge anyone to prove otherwise!!!
anyone ever seen pictures or the actual houses and cars the gb own?
im wondering if the live a middle class lifestyle or more like high society?
anyone ever seen pictures or the actual houses and cars the gb own?
im wondering if the live a middle class lifestyle or more like high society?
so i was fooled by the witnesses.
what can i learn from that?
not to accept things at face value but to seek out opinion and different view points.. hence my question " do you believe man landed on the moon?.
Yea they made it and definitely encountered aliens
so i was fooled by the witnesses.
what can i learn from that?
not to accept things at face value but to seek out opinion and different view points.. hence my question " do you believe man landed on the moon?.
I love listening too and entertaining conspiracy theories, that being said I can always go back to what I know for sure to be true based on the best evidence. Again they can be fun, doesn't make them true. Just an exercise for the human brain, to be able to say I am willing to entertain something that threatens the way I assume things are. But again, the truth is the truth, just because its sounds cool and stuff doesn't make it true.
Do you forgive me Viv?
so i was fooled by the witnesses.
what can i learn from that?
not to accept things at face value but to seek out opinion and different view points.. hence my question " do you believe man landed on the moon?.
NASA is definitely the scientific branch of the CIA, I don't think that is too far fetched lol. Also it is a direct result of project paper clip
