this you will never see on the mainstream media.
before you comment watch the whole video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqaigeqxqgi.
Sweden is a champion of taking in asylum seekers, and a complete failure at integrating them, probably because of biting off more than they can chew, and because Islamists don't integrate with the enemy. So do you blame Sweden for the failed integration???
Is it fair to say that trump could be correct in that it's not what Sweden expected as far a integration into society goes?
to me they have an agenda and they really don't care about professional journalism.
most are untrustworthy and that's a shame.
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-37578919
More than 300 people have gone to fight in Syria and Iraq, making Sweden per capita one of the biggest exporters of jihadists in Europe...
What has happened to Swedes who have travelled to Iraq and Syria, I ask Bostrom.
"Well there is a number of 311 or so but none who have come back have been arrested. I think our terrorism law is not functioning well enough," he says.
What I find interesting from many different things I have heard, is that the migrants feel discriminated against, but on the other side of the coin (which I put far more weight in) they don't try to integrate with society. A very small percentage work, and they still hold to their ideas like Sharia that keep them isolated.
Face it, if Islam was a social club instead of fucking religion, you would be disgusted by anyone who belonged to it.
I don't have any references right now, but I have read several things stating the while Sweden leads Europe in taking in asylum seekers, the intigration has actually been a total failure
to me they have an agenda and they really don't care about professional journalism.
most are untrustworthy and that's a shame.
This is all like when Trump made the "2nd amendment folks" comment back during the campaign and the MSM immediately spun it as an assassination suggestion towards Clinton or Supreme Court judges. If you just listen to the news it's easy to form a quick (emotional) opinion, then when you realize the actual context that's not what he was talking about, just like this he was not talking about a terrorist attack, its another MSM spin.
This is the problem with everything coming out of the Mainstreams mouth right now. The real issues or problems that could get reported about trump are lost in a quagmire of hyperventilation over every breath he takes and what they try to suggest it means. It's exhausting and to people willing to take pause and filter out the spin, it's making the media look worse and trump look more like the populist hero he has been made out to seem.
The truth is the mainstream media is small dying elite group, and they are full on attacking any kind of "populist" figures that threaten their cozy little club. Like Trump and like pewdiepie. I posted an extensive video about this earlier which I am sure no one watched because its too much work.
Ask yourself why a conservative propaganda machine like Fox is now the only place certain liberals can speak because they have been effectively shunned by the left media. How freaking insane is that? How is classical liberalism and free speech becoming "conservative"
I have no doubt certain leaders and news groups in europe are actively trying to obscure any migrant issues. After watching the Obama be a complete jackass moron and never be able to say "radical ISLAM" or Hillary after the pulse shooting, a homophobic jihad turned into a gun control issue... WAKE UP
.
http://www.npr.org/2017/02/19/510585965/poor-education-leads-to-lost-dreams-and-low-income-for-many-jehovahs-witnesses.
Sorry I tried searching to see if this was already posted and didn't see it in the search, but it looks like it was
.
http://www.npr.org/2017/02/19/510585965/poor-education-leads-to-lost-dreams-and-low-income-for-many-jehovahs-witnesses.
to me they have an agenda and they really don't care about professional journalism.
most are untrustworthy and that's a shame.
to me they have an agenda and they really don't care about professional journalism.
most are untrustworthy and that's a shame.
trolling the left is much more fun than the right because they go absolutely ballistic these days
to me they have an agenda and they really don't care about professional journalism.
most are untrustworthy and that's a shame.
here we go again. Not everyone who supports Trump is vile or full of hate. In your limited JW world I know it's easy to paint people with the evil brush. There is a lot more hate coming from the left now, both media and supporters.
Preach!I When are we getting married just fine.
I say left (also a broad brush stroke) often but its really not a representation of all liberals, more of the irrational cult making so much noise in the name of the left. Many liberals are actually taking the path of libertarianism once they realize the far left is becoming everything true liberals fight against.
to me they have an agenda and they really don't care about professional journalism.
most are untrustworthy and that's a shame.
Here is an interesting question(s)
Is it fair to say that the mainstream news media put past presidents under the same scrutiny?
And if they did was it always justifiable? or did it have left or right spin?
And if they didn't would they (WH staff) have seemed as blundering trying to nonstop defend every single move they made no matter how large or small it was?
to me they have an agenda and they really don't care about professional journalism.
most are untrustworthy and that's a shame.
No need for swearing and constant name calling...
sounds like someone we know.... but I can't put my finger on it...
