http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/26/us/arizona-girl-fatal-shooting-accident/index.html?hpt=hp_t2.
"a 9-year-old girl learning to fire a submachine gun accidentally killed her instructor at a shooting range when the weapon recoiled over her shoulder, according to arizona authorities.
another reason to go against those arguing that young children should be taught how to use guns.
How does my simply giving a synopsis of the facts of the incident get translated into the idea I agree with what was done?
Maybe spend more time reading my posts and less time reading into them.
ADCMS
You should go back and read your own posts on this thread. You'll see why you're getting negative responses here even though you're trying to walk back your remarks.
While I often agree with your general observations, your position on guns is always pro, no matter the circumstances.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/26/us/arizona-girl-fatal-shooting-accident/index.html?hpt=hp_t2.
"a 9-year-old girl learning to fire a submachine gun accidentally killed her instructor at a shooting range when the weapon recoiled over her shoulder, according to arizona authorities.
another reason to go against those arguing that young children should be taught how to use guns.
The problem with the phrase "just an accident" is that it is dismissive of further analysis which might lead to a solution that prevents this happening in the future. It implies that, as a accident, it was unavoidable.
Of course it was an ACCIDENT. But it wasn't just an accident. It was much more than just an accident. It was tragically bad judgement on the part of the adults who were supposed to be in charge. And it should lead to policy changes for all shooting ranges, enforced by the feds if necessary.
OMG! Gun control!
http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/26/us/arizona-girl-fatal-shooting-accident/index.html?hpt=hp_t2.
"a 9-year-old girl learning to fire a submachine gun accidentally killed her instructor at a shooting range when the weapon recoiled over her shoulder, according to arizona authorities.
another reason to go against those arguing that young children should be taught how to use guns.
HTBWC
Hmmm 150 years ago 'kids' knew how to fire a rifle etc BEFORE that age in many parts of America/Canada ..... Kids today are raised not to be men or woemn but to be kids... that is the problem
HTBWC
Hmmm 150 years ago 'kids' knew how to fire a rifle etc BEFORE that age in many parts of America/Canada ..... Kids today are raised not to be men or woemn but to be kids... that is the problem
I don't believe automatic weapons were around 150 years ago.
This gun thing is out of control. Well-regulated militia my Aunt Fanny.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/26/us/arizona-girl-fatal-shooting-accident/index.html?hpt=hp_t2.
"a 9-year-old girl learning to fire a submachine gun accidentally killed her instructor at a shooting range when the weapon recoiled over her shoulder, according to arizona authorities.
another reason to go against those arguing that young children should be taught how to use guns.
NAME some of those arguing that young children should be taught how to use guns.
Google "children taught to use guns."
http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/26/us/arizona-girl-fatal-shooting-accident/index.html?hpt=hp_t2.
"a 9-year-old girl learning to fire a submachine gun accidentally killed her instructor at a shooting range when the weapon recoiled over her shoulder, according to arizona authorities.
another reason to go against those arguing that young children should be taught how to use guns.
I have a feeling that, as more information is forthcoming, the parents are revealed to be idiots.
i'm not sure if this has been discussed before.
you guys might recall that when the 2013 yearbook came out, the letter from the governing body ended a bit unusually:.
we love you all very much.
During the recent (2012) election campaign, the Romney camp was doing very poorly with the female demographic.
Ann Romney took to the stage and at one point said, without preamble or context, "I LOVE YOU WOMEN!"
Such blatant, mindless pandering probably hurt them - just as the GB's, "We love you children!" should hurt them.
It sounds condescending, patronizing, and exploitive.
i'll wager that the number is close to 100 percent.
what number?
the number of jws who have lists--lists of things that make them go hmmm or even wha'???
The violence in the OT never sat well
God is a serial killer. Straight up.
I un-friended Him many years ago.
baa bull onn (knock knock).
baa bull onn (knock knock).
baa bull onn (knock knock).
Weird.
Bi-polar or on pharmaceuticals?
people like robin williams can make you laugh.
we might think that they have it all but we really know nothing about their demons, their problems, their issues.
someone might be funny on the outside but be totally depressed from within..
Yes, Mum. Thanks for posting Richard Cory. I thought of that one, too, remembering it from high school.
i thought it was a genuinely old silent movie.
it was prepared for the delegates of the international conventions.
a young man in a sound car goes to different homes in the neighborhood, and comes upon a bereaved husband with two young daughters.
It reminds me of an old movie I saw about this hustler who would go from town to town in the 30's,
he would buy a paper and after a checking the death notices turn up at widows/widowers doors to sell them a bible.
"Paper Moon"
