Outlaw wrote: Even if it was a gift of just one share.. They did`nt have to accept the gift of the stock in the first place..
Outlaw - I agree with you 100%.
For them to knowingly accept one dollar from something that they vehemently condemn is inexcusable. They are quick to DF someone for smoking or eating with a disapproved relative but have zero qualms about their own much greater 'sins'. I agree.
And I also agree with wobble when he wrote:
If anyone wants to use the info. about the WT owned investment in Rand Corp I would be very careful how you word it so as to be accurate in what you accuse the WT of.
I am merely trying to verify the accuracy of this one statement which implys that they owned a 'governing share' in RandCam:
Alwayshere wrote: WTS owned 50% of a company that made war weapons.
-Aude.