That the date 607 is most likely wrong and 587 is most likely right, making 1914 wrong. That God most likely used evolution as his means of creation and the wording of Genesis allowing that possibility. That the flood of Noah's day was most likely a large but non-global flood and the wording of Genesis allowing that possibility.I actually got the elders to admit that all of those things were possible and that the Society might change their teachings on all of them in years to come. So they said questioning our present understanding of them is not wrong, so long as I did not "run ahead of the 'Faithful Slave' on such matters" and did not spread doubts about the "Faithful Slave" in the congregation.
Indeed, they could not have made it any clearer that they follow the FDS before they follow the bible. Sounds like we went through the exact same thing, I'm sure many like us have. Thanks for the support, that's why I posted this, for people like us, as a reminder of how stupid and inflexable the whole orginazation is.