Hi Narkissos, thanks for the link . I've quickly look at Matthew 21:9 and I see "Lord" I'm maybe missing something .. I'll look into the .pdf better
Ancientofdays
JoinedPosts by Ancientofdays
-
7
Where "The Emphatic Diaglott" contains The Name ?
by Ancientofdays ini'm aware from wts literature that "the emphatic diaglott" contains divine name in 18 istance (reasoning book page 156 italian version).
does anybody know if these 18 instances are only citation of hebrew verses ?
-
-
-
7
Where "The Emphatic Diaglott" contains The Name ?
by Ancientofdays ini'm aware from wts literature that "the emphatic diaglott" contains divine name in 18 istance (reasoning book page 156 italian version).
does anybody know if these 18 instances are only citation of hebrew verses ?
-
-
Ancientofdays
I'm aware from WTS literature that "The Emphatic Diaglott" contains Divine Name in 18 istance (Reasoning book page 156 italian version). Does anybody know if these 18 instances are only citation of hebrew verses ?
-
2
Citation of YHMW in the 1969 KIT
by Ancientofdays ineverybody can look at the 237 citation of yhwh in the new world traslation appendix, as in the kingdom interlinear 1985 version.
the translator comitee decided to use yhwh for theological reasons where the original text containsx kyros.
i know that in the kingdom interlinear , 1969 version (i never seen it, aniway) the citation of yhwh were a lot more.
-
-
Ancientofdays
Everybody can look at the 237 citation of YHWH in the New World Traslation appendix, as in the Kingdom Interlinear 1985 version. The translator comitee decided to use YHWH for theological reasons where the original text containsx KYROS. I know that in the Kingdom Interlinear , 1969 version (I never seen it, aniway) the citation of YHWH were a lot more. Exactly should be 307 citation. So , why the numbers of citation has decreased in 1985 version ? Anyone has a list of the mismatching (237 vs 307) ? thanks for help
-
7
Josephus mentioned also 40 (or 50) years for desolation of Judea ?
by Ancientofdays inbased on the "kingdom" book appendix we know that josephus wrote regarding a 70 years desolation of judea and jerusalem , in his "antiquites jews".
now , i remember i red somewhere that josephus also mentioned 40 (or maybe 50) years desolation in a second statement in his book , probably he get confused .
obviusly the watchtower did not mention the second statement.
-
-
Ancientofdays
Thank Blues for the scan. Leo this was exactly what I was looking for, I can't remember the book was "Contra Apionen". I'll look for a copy in a public library , here in Italy. ciao
-
7
Josephus mentioned also 40 (or 50) years for desolation of Judea ?
by Ancientofdays inbased on the "kingdom" book appendix we know that josephus wrote regarding a 70 years desolation of judea and jerusalem , in his "antiquites jews".
now , i remember i red somewhere that josephus also mentioned 40 (or maybe 50) years desolation in a second statement in his book , probably he get confused .
obviusly the watchtower did not mention the second statement.
-
-
Ancientofdays
Based on the "Kingdom" book appendix we know that Josephus wrote regarding a 70 years desolation of Judea and Jerusalem , in his "Antiquites Jews". Now , I remember I red somewhere that Josephus also mentioned 40 (or maybe 50) years desolation in a second statement in his book , probably he get confused . Obviusly the Watchtower did not mention the second statement. I never had any opportunity to look to "Antiquites Jews" directly. Any of you can confirm that second statement exists and eventually scan or link ? thanks
-
22
here the picture
by Ancientofdays inok.. i can post the picture.
i was not aware that using firefox there are some limitation, now with explorer works fine.
http://i9.tinypic.com/2nqgqjm.jpg.
-
-
Ancientofdays
Sorry again for the big confusion I did. I opened 2 topics !!
The picture is from the September / 10/ 2006 WT study (last week)
BizzyBeeYawn.....................so what? Seeing faces and animals and hot fudge sundaes in clouds has been pretty standard since the dawn of time. Or at least since the dawn of whipped cream. Get over it.
What you see in the clothes is natural , what you see in that picture is artificial.By the way the articol was "FEAR GOOD" which as per comments of Blondie means "FEAR WTS". Would surprise me to see in the clothes of this draw a "whipped crem" , instead of a scrowling , spooky face.
-
19
Can you see subliminal in 9-10-06 WT ?
by Ancientofdays inhi , have you notice the picture of david whyle is playing cetra in the dark ?
look at the clothes, can you see a man face profile (round the image 90 degrees dx)?
i don't know how to post the image.
-
-
Ancientofdays
here the picture, I made a bit of confusion. I was using Firefox , but has some limitation. With Explores is fine
-
22
here the picture
by Ancientofdays inok.. i can post the picture.
i was not aware that using firefox there are some limitation, now with explorer works fine.
http://i9.tinypic.com/2nqgqjm.jpg.
-
-
Ancientofdays
ok.
I can post the picture. I was not aware that using Firefox there are some limitation, now with Explorer works fine
-
19
Can you see subliminal in 9-10-06 WT ?
by Ancientofdays inhi , have you notice the picture of david whyle is playing cetra in the dark ?
look at the clothes, can you see a man face profile (round the image 90 degrees dx)?
i don't know how to post the image.
-
-
Ancientofdays
Hi , have you notice the picture of David whyle is playing cetra in the dark ? Look at the clothes, can you see a man face profile (round the image 90 degrees dx)? I don't know how to post the image. I'm looking for instructions
-
53
Revelation "Adjustments": Complete Analysis
by V inreference update.
chapter 6. .
reference update.
-
-
Ancientofdays
Hi , This is my first message , I follow you from time to time and this topics is amazing. Unfortunatly , here in Italy I still have not received my Sptember 2006 Kingdom paper. So I base the comment on what I can read from V’s post. I have notice a correction of p.32 box; that’s regarding the DOCTRINE CHANGE (“Judging” effective 1995) They replaced ‘”sitting down on his glorious throne” in the heavens in October 1914’ ( the sentence from Matthew 25:31-33), with “Jesus’s enthronement in the heavens in October 1914”. Looks to me that Jesus will be enthroned twice !! The first has been in 1914 (this is fundamental WT doctrine). The second will be just before GT , when he will sits on his glorious throne to judge (Mat 25:31-33), this is based on the revised sheep and goats split doctrine, in 1995. Can you see this ? Gianni
