'they are not able to claim a copyright for Caleb or Sophia."- Richard Oliver
"I never said items or characters aren't copyrightable" - Richard Oliver
Which is it ? Can they or can't they be copyrighted?
i've been noticing lots of these pins on lapels.
i could almost understand the jwdotorg pin because the new mantra is to go to the website.
but why on earth are they sporting a building?
'they are not able to claim a copyright for Caleb or Sophia."- Richard Oliver
"I never said items or characters aren't copyrightable" - Richard Oliver
Which is it ? Can they or can't they be copyrighted?
i've been noticing lots of these pins on lapels.
i could almost understand the jwdotorg pin because the new mantra is to go to the website.
but why on earth are they sporting a building?
"U.S. copyright law (title 17 of the United States Code) provides for copyright protection of literary and artistic works. Copyright protection begins automatically when a work is first created in a fixed form. Cartoons and comic strips are among the types of works of authorship protected by copyright. This protection extends to any copyrightable pictorial or written expression contained in the work. Thus a drawing, picture, depiction, or written description of a character can be registered for copyright. Protection does not, however, extend to the title or general theme for a cartoon or comic strip, the general idea or name for characters depicted, or their intangible attributes. Although the copyright law does not provide such protection, a character may be protected under aspects of state, common, or trademark laws, and titles and names may sometimes be protected under state law doctrines or state and federal trademark laws." copyright.gov
i've been noticing lots of these pins on lapels.
i could almost understand the jwdotorg pin because the new mantra is to go to the website.
but why on earth are they sporting a building?
Richard Oliver......thank you for not providing ANY proof that Caleb and Sophia as characters are not copyrighted or trademarked. I am to accept your word just because you say so. Read the link that I provided and perhaps you will learn something.
i've been noticing lots of these pins on lapels.
i could almost understand the jwdotorg pin because the new mantra is to go to the website.
but why on earth are they sporting a building?
Actually, Richard Oliver, I believe that Watchtower can obtain both copyright and trademark rights for Caleb and Sophia if they so desire. You stated that "Watchtower does not own a copyright for Caleb and Sophia, nor are they able to claim a copyright for Caleb and Sophia." Can you provide direct evidence for such a claim? Caleb and Sophia are not just depictions of a generic boy and girl but rather are specific characters used to present a copyrighted idea. Go to JW.ORG and access the Children's page "Become Jehovah's Friend". There you will find videos, songs and activities based around the Caleb and Sophia characters. Now, scroll down to the bottom of the page and notice that it says: "Copyright (c) 2017 Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania." Next, click on TERMS OF USE and you will see that they 'claim' copyright for all text and information on the website. To further your legal education I have provided a link for you to a 'real' lawyer discussing the subject of Character trademarks and copyright:
hi friends,.
it's been awhile since i've been talkative.
thought i'd give you an account of my latest family dysfunction.. a brief backstory is that i am an only child whose parents were born in jw's.
"Criticism was her only form of communication" - 3rdgen
Sounds just like my mother! She was viciously criticizing me right up to her death in the hospital! Lots of cruel and unchristian parents were produced by the Watchtower doctrine. I have complete empathy and sympathy for you having to grow up in a dysfunctional family system. At least we survived and thrived the best we could without intentionally hurting others. Best wishes to you.
randall watters presents the fascinating backstory of the "aid book", and the brouhaha surrounding it, in this article:.
"the watchtower bible and tract society: the critical years 1975-1997".
so far it seems the project to research and write the "aid to bible understanding" revealed serious doctrinal and institutional flaws that the gb wanted to preserve nonetheless.. it seems what ray franz and his team were learning, and were largely blocked from presenting:.
Here you go 3rdgen:
"Sexually immoral acts committed by a married person with someone of the same sex (homosexuality) are filthy and disgusting. Unrepentant persons of this type will not inherit Gods kingdom. And, of course, bestiality is Scripturally condemned. (Lev. 18:22, 23: Rom. 1:24-27 ; 1 Cor. 6:9,10) However, though these acts are grossly filthy, they do not constitute adultery, and are not named as Christian grounds for divorce." - AID TO BIBLE UNDERSTANDING page 460 under subheading ONLY GROUND FOR DIVORCE AMONG CHRISTIANS
A clear cut instance of the Governing Body (tm) 'not being inspired and can make mistakes'. God intoxicated, religiously deluded , narcissistic charlatans playing with peoples lives by masquerading as spiritual and moral guides!
randall watters presents the fascinating backstory of the "aid book", and the brouhaha surrounding it, in this article:.
"the watchtower bible and tract society: the critical years 1975-1997".
so far it seems the project to research and write the "aid to bible understanding" revealed serious doctrinal and institutional flaws that the gb wanted to preserve nonetheless.. it seems what ray franz and his team were learning, and were largely blocked from presenting:.
"However I checked and there is no entry for 'judicial committee' ".............. slimboyfat
That a very interesting observation. In comparing the Aid book to the Insight book on the entry of Expelling, the Insight book completely leaves out the following paragraph that was found in the Aid book:
"Jesus gave full instructions to his followers as to the procedure on handling cases of sin in the congregation and indicated that it could result in one's being expelled, so that the individual would be to the congregation 'just as a man of the nations and a tax collector.' (Matt. 18-15-17) Tax collectors were much looked down upon; many were extortioners. A Jew who was a tax collector was considered a renegade, classed with sinners. (Mark 2:16) Of course, Jesus and his disciples were still under the Law, but in principle the same procedure continued to guide the Christian congregation. It might be remarked here that, by the 'congregation' , Jesus did not mean that the entire membership sat in judgment of the offender; the responsible ones in charge did this. His disciples were familiar with the fact that it was the elders or the 'court of justice' or the 'Supreme Court' that did the judging. - Matt. 5:22" - AID TO BIBLE UNDERSTANDING page 550 under the subheading Christian Congregation
randall watters presents the fascinating backstory of the "aid book", and the brouhaha surrounding it, in this article:.
"the watchtower bible and tract society: the critical years 1975-1997".
so far it seems the project to research and write the "aid to bible understanding" revealed serious doctrinal and institutional flaws that the gb wanted to preserve nonetheless.. it seems what ray franz and his team were learning, and were largely blocked from presenting:.
DISFELLOWSHIPPING. See Expelling. Aid to Bible Understanding page 454, 1971 Edition
DISFELLOWSHIPPING. See Expelling. Insight on The Scriptures page 634, 1988 Edition
"jehovah's witnesses are too cultish for my liking" what do you think about my new word invention?.
"jehovah's witnesses are too cultish for my liking" what do you think about my new word invention?.
CULTISH: adj. - "intended to appeal to a small group of fashionable people." Collins English Dictionary 12th edition 2014
Sorry to inform you but you have not coined a new word.