The WTS is delusional. They don't even realize they are propagandists.
j
this link is directly from the "official" watchtower website.
it's a short reading.
now, imagine somebody trying to apply this very same advice to their own jehovah's witness faith.
The WTS is delusional. They don't even realize they are propagandists.
j
"published by jehovah's witnesses".
what the hell is up with this statement?
i've seen it occur a lot since i've been out of the org.
Terms such as "publisher", "pioneer", etc were Rutherford era terms. His contrarian nature kept him from applying mainstream Christianity's terms, such as "preacher". He also had a very legalistic nature, (as a wannabe lawyer, I'm not sure he ever passed the BAR anywhere), and preferred to use terms that had rather ambigous meanings outside of the jw organization.
j
follow up to previous threads..... http://www.northjersey.com/page.php?qstr=exjpcnk3zjczn2y3dnflzuvfexkzntcmzmdizww3zjd2cwvlruv5etcwnjg3mtimexjpcnk3zjcxn2y3dnflzuvfexkz.
paterson -- the masons built their paterson headquarters to last.
in justifying why the former masonic temple should be considered a local historic landmark, gianfranco archimede, executive director of the paterson historic preservation commission, pointed to the building's mass.
I worked on that building back in '93 or so when I did the RBC thing. There was rumor that an electric chair was found in the basement, but that could be just another jw urban legend. My sister went to one of the Paterson congs there, and was also married there in '99. It seems the jws didn't keep it long, but supposedly they sold it for $5 million.
j
so says the "what does the bible really teach" book.
"like that candy, holidays may seem sweet, but they have been picked up from unclean places.....we need to have a viewpoint like that of the prophet isaiah, who told true worshiper:touch nothing unclean".---------so origins really matter!
---------isn't it funny how the society can pick and choose which pagan origins aren't as bad as another??
I thought that was the 5 second rule...damn.
j
g'day everyone, i am just curious to k. now if anyone has found another religion, which they believe has gods backing.
if you have i would love to hear about it .
thanks for looking at this post, cassie.
None for me, thanks. If God exists, he, (she, it), will be my judge, and not any organization. Like Warlock said, I'm done.
j
if (for the sake of argument for those who believe in god) there was no god, and no human being who ever lived had ever come up with or even had a concept of god or a higher being.
where do you think we as human beings would be today.
what do you think our history would be like, and our future?
Have you seen those pathetic little poodles that shake all the time? We would have been like that. Afraid of our own shadows. Surviving.
The concept of something bigger than ourselves that can take care of us, or demand retribution for unsociable conduct, permitted mankind to venture far from his cave and aspire to something greater.
Before you dismiss that thought, consider this: we are where we are because we have been where we have been. It couldn't have been any other way. The results would have been vastly different from what we see around us. Do you genuinely think we could have got to this level of complexity without the intermediary stages?
On the point of Quantum, etc., I agree with Mauzzim.
LT, I like the way you think. That shows a level of insight that really goes beyond the question raised.
j
oh noez how will we survive?!?!.
more details later, but it's a case of a congo that split not growing and the congo it split from losing 50% of its publishers in two years.. i'm tickled pink!.
Doesn't matter what term they use. It's good news!
People are waking up!
j
have you ever wondered why jesus did not put anything in writing?
he was here to explain his father to us and teach us how to gain salvation.
wouldn't it have been a good thing to write his instructions down, rather than leave it up to others many years later?
I agree that the speed of acceptance, (if you want to call it that), doesen't mean anything in itself. But a study of just how different the Roman world was, as opposed to Christian philosphy, is quite stark. Why did the people choose to believe this? Could it have been because much of the basic philosophy, (outside of the "miracles", resurrection, etc), actually made some sense to these people? I dunno. But just because certain emperical evidence dosen't appear to exist, in support of a living "Jesus", dosen't disqualify the fact that something significant happend during this time. What was that? If anyone knows, I like to hear it. (No challenge here, just looking for information).
j
have you ever wondered why jesus did not put anything in writing?
he was here to explain his father to us and teach us how to gain salvation.
wouldn't it have been a good thing to write his instructions down, rather than leave it up to others many years later?
The hostility was not meant I am bored today nothing to do I thought by coming across frankly it would make you want to prove the ASS HOLE in cyberland wrong. When I first started coming to this board I believed in the bible and everything in it. I would argue with the posters, with in a few months JWD posters proved me wrong about creation and the bible. Then they took my Jesus away from me. I was mad for a while. I now I feel so free it is very nice too feel free from the overwhelming pressure that the GOD of the bible gives you.
I'm with ya...
j
have you ever wondered why jesus did not put anything in writing?
he was here to explain his father to us and teach us how to gain salvation.
wouldn't it have been a good thing to write his instructions down, rather than leave it up to others many years later?
Way too much evidence against the Jesus that you believe in done4good. Prove me wrong I dare you done4good
Why the hostility, may I ask? If you read my following posts, maybe you would get the point. But since, because maybe I just wasn't clear enough for you, I'll clear it up. I don't necessarily believe he DID exist. But rational arguments, appear to go both ways. True, little secular information, aside from the highly questionable Josephus writings provide any mention of the man. This is well known. However, it does NOT account for this movement of Christianity, arising at a time, and taking people out of many different belief systems, and suddendly becoming willing to die for this cause. Why is that??? This is why many historians can't conclusively agree that the man did not exist. Best assumptions seem to be that some man named "Jesus" did, not neccesarily in the first century, but perhaps long before that, exist. As time went on, combined with the opression of the Roman system over the Jews, as well as the oppression of the Jewish system, itself, people decided to "take" to this belief system. That may be, but it sounds like a lot to happen within a century.
I apologize, if somehow I sounded hostile.
j