Thanks for the personal attacks and the big bold leaders that scream, "I want to be heard." You can call me all the names and smears you want but leave blue out of this. I have no idea who he/she is.
Gumbley
JoinedPosts by Gumbley
-
11
Judges Probed On Masonic Links - BBC
by Gumbley inwednesday, 26 september, 2001, 15:13 gmt 16:13 uk
judges probed on masonic links .
the justice minister is reluctant to back such a move.
-
-
-
-
-
Gumbley
Scully, you are getting ahead of me here. First I must build my case that the majority of the world's judges are Freemasons. After I establish that, than we can take a shot at Mr. Hughes and the various other lawsuits, judges, and who they really are.
-
11
Judges Probed On Masonic Links - BBC
by Gumbley inwednesday, 26 september, 2001, 15:13 gmt 16:13 uk
judges probed on masonic links .
the justice minister is reluctant to back such a move.
-
-
Gumbley
good evening kwr. What is TIA.
What does this have to do with the Jehovah's Witnesses? Well if you have been following some of my posts in the last week, I wish to share my theory that the Watchtower was created and is run by the Illuminati/Freemasons, and as such, Masonic judges who encounter lawsuits against the Watchtower, be it, rape, pedophilia, wrongful death etc... these judges are under Masonic oath that they must decide favourably for fellow Masons or fellow Masonic organizations, including the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society.
Briefly speaking, the world is full of Kangaroo courts.
-
11
Judges Probed On Masonic Links - BBC
by Gumbley inwednesday, 26 september, 2001, 15:13 gmt 16:13 uk
judges probed on masonic links .
the justice minister is reluctant to back such a move.
-
-
Gumbley
He expressed concerns over secrecy within the freemasons and the possible impact membership could have on the impartiality of the judiciary.
-
11
Judges Probed On Masonic Links - BBC
by Gumbley inwednesday, 26 september, 2001, 15:13 gmt 16:13 uk
judges probed on masonic links .
the justice minister is reluctant to back such a move.
-
-
Gumbley
Wednesday, 26 September, 2001, 15:13 GMT 16:13 UK Judges probed on masonic links
The justice minister is reluctant to back such a move.
A Scottish Parliament committee has decided to press on with plans to get judges to disclose whether they are members of the freemasons. The Justice 2 Committee has been told by the Justice Minister Jim Wallace that it would be difficult to legislate for such a change.
But the convener of the committee, Pauline McNeill, said there was public concern over the issue of freemasonry in the judiciary.
The Labour MSP for Glasgow Kelvin said the committee would revisit the subject as part of its review of the judicial appointments system.
Pauline McNeill MSP: Public concernThe committee made its pledge despite the continued reluctance of Mr Wallace to back such a move.
He had told the committee he would see difficulties with the proposal, which would require fresh primary legislation.
However, on Wednesday, the committee said it should be part of the consideration in new judicial appointment procedures which are expected to be brought forward by the Scottish Executive.
Possible impact
In England, the Lord Chancellor has instructed all new applicants for posts in the judiciary south of the border to say whether they are freemasons while serving members have also been asked to declare on a voluntary basis.
But there is no register of membership and the information held in the Lord Chancellor's department is not open to public inspection.
However, Mr Wallace insisted in February that there was "no need for any steps to be taken at this time" in Scotland.
The issue was raised in a petition to the Scottish Parliament from Thomas Minogue, managing director of Kingdom Engineering in Cowdenbeath.
He expressed concerns over secrecy within the freemasons and the possible impact membership could have on the impartiality of the judiciary.
The committee has taken evidence from court users and judicial bodies on the issue.
-
-
-
Gumbley
a few more Masonic Judges: I will keep adding to this
U. S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES:
Black, Hugo L.; Blair, Jr., John; Blatchford, Samuel; Baldwin, Henry; Burton, Harold H.; Byrnes, James F.; Catton, John; Clark, Thomas C.; Clarke, John H.; Cushing, William; Devanter, Willis Van; Douglas, William O.; Ellsworth, Oliver; Field, Stephen J.; Harlan, John M.; Jackson, Robert H.; Lamar, Joseph E.; Marshall, John - Chief Justice U.S. Supreme Court 1801 - 1835;Mathews, Stanley; Minton, Sherman; Moody, William H.; Nelson, Samuel; Paterson, William; Pitney, Mahlon; Reed, Stanley F.; Rutledge, Wiley B.; Stewart, Potter; Swayne, Noah H.; Todd, Thomas; Trimble, Robert; Vinson, Frederick M.; Warren, Earl; Woodbury, Levi; Woods, William B.;
-
-
-
Gumbley
Give me some time to compile a list, but here is one.
Marshall S.C.J., Thurgood – 1967-1991. Associate Justice appointed by Pres. Lyndon B. Johnson. Confirmed Mason. Marshall is listed in 10,000 Famous Freemasons as having been a director and counselor or the Prince Hall Grand Master Conference, and a 33rd degree Scottish Rite Mason. - Roe vs. Wade's Dirty Little Secret.
-
22
Did Masonic Judges Sabotage Lawrences Hughes Case To Protect The WT?
by Gumbley inmost people who are familiar with how the system works, know that most judges are masons.
that is how you get to the next level, by being initiated into the 32 or 33rd degree of freemasonry.
were the masonic judges dealing with lawrence hughes attempt to sue the watchtower acting in accordance with masonic law to protect the best interest of the brotherhood?
-
-
Gumbley
Consider this:
Page 91
1) An Officer of the court who knew of an arrest warrant sworn out against a brother Mason would have to warn him immediately so he could flee the jurisdiction.
2) A Mason who was told of a brother Mason's crimes, even including rape, robbery, or child abuse, would have to keep his knowledge of those crimes a secret, even in a court of law!
3) A Royal Arch Mason who knew of a Companion Mason's being a murderer or a traitor would have to keep his knowledge a secret!
4) A Royal Arch Mason would be obligated to hire a Companion Mason, even for sensitive or skilled professions, even if he didn't have nearly the qualifications required.
Additionally, though not mentioned in the oaths, many time Masons get a "fairer" trial in courts where a Masonic judge presides. A sizeable majority of judges are Masons, and many attorneys are Masons as well. If a Mason appears in court against a non-Mason, all he has to do is give any number of obscure gestures or words to the judge, and the judge will be obligated to rule in his favour. No one in the court room will be the wiser (except another Mason, who would be forbidden from bringing the incident to light).
It is easy to see how these elements of the oaths could very definitely be detrimental to the welfare of our nation. Masons, it is said, "take care of their own," and they do, to an extent which is frightening.
Page 92-93
Beyond the Light by William Schnoebelen
-
-
-
Gumbley
If I am right about the lawsuits against the Watchtower......the Watchtower being a Masonic/Illuminati front, and if I am correct that most Masons are judges, than you guys are going to have to figure out another way around this because there is a way to defeat the Watchtower and bring it down. I would not rely on lawsuits all that much unless you have an astounding case that cant lose....or if you are filthy stinking rich and you have a team of lawyers helping you.
Lets put our collective apostate heads together and come up with something better.
-
-
-
Gumbley
You are completetly oblivious to how the system works. Do you think George Bush would have became president if not for his Masonic membership in Yale's Skull and Bones?
Do you think that Bill Clinton would have become president of the United States if he had not been a member of the Grand Masonic Lodge of Israel?
Would Billy Graham have become a star televangelist if he had not been initiated into the 33rd degree of Freemasonry?
The fact that most judges are Masons is not even a secret. There are many widely known Masonic judges.
The justice minister is reluctant to back such a move.
A Scottish Parliament committee has decided to press on with plans to get judges to disclose whether they are members of the freemasons. 