For everybody's information, this article is due to be studied in the week of January 19 - 25
I would be grateful if anyone in good standing could attend that meeting and report back on what was said and any conversations overheard afterwards (you might even want to start a conversation and steer it towards what this article might mean).
Also that week someone might be able to monitor the pro JW boards to see if anyone picks up on this (or even start a thread yourself ).
I expect there will be a 'question from readers' about this sometime mid-summer, with further clarification.
Thanks everyone for your input. This has really divided folks into two camps, but in a nice way!
We will just have to wait and see what they say next on this subject.
Personally I think the jigsaw pieces have been given out by the GB, they will now wait to see if the R&F can put them together to make the picture. Not stating things outright is their current modus operandi (sp?).
The reason for this is simple - plausible deniability.
I also think Stephanus makes an excellent point about a succession of minor dates (not stated but hinted at) to keep the dubs on their toes. This article is important as it sets an outside limit on the length of this system; but an imminent Armageddon will still be pushed.