Posts by BurnTheShips

40

Pale Blue Dot

by NomadSoul in

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lm6pehykhsfrom this distant vantage point, the earth might not seem of particular interest.

look again at that dot.

that's here, that's home, that's us.

BurnTheShips

How many strands do you see here?

http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/Issues/2005/July/DNA.asp

This is not a form of DNA that occurs in the nucleus of human cells. You could construct 4 stranded DNA, if you wanted.

You can build nanomachines with DNA molecules, if you wanted.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_nanotechnology

http://www.nature.com/nnano/journal/v2/n5/full/nnano.2007.104.html

http://www.physorg.com/news191225412.html

You can tie the tips of the molecule together into a ring, if you wanted (this is called a plasmid, and is being used for next generation DNA vaccination technology where the introduced DNA sequences are used to produce specific antigens to create immunity)

http://www.nature.com/nrg/journal/v9/n10/execsumm/nrg2432.html

http://biomedical.rutgers.edu/content/topics/Sardesai/Kutzler.pdf

You can use DNA in silicon/DNA hybrid computing devices, if you wanted.

http://www.dukenews.duke.edu/2003/11/dnacircuits1118.html

Researchers have been doing all of these things by rearranging the discrete DNA components.

But nuclear DNA that you have in healthy cells in your own human body is two stranded.

Interdimensional 12 Strand DNA Activation $99

DNA interdimensionally activated with 12 strands? That is right up there with Christ's "invisible return" in the Watchtower! Where do I sign up? I have a hundred bucks to blow!

BTS

40

Pale Blue Dot

by NomadSoul in

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lm6pehykhsfrom this distant vantage point, the earth might not seem of particular interest.

look again at that dot.

that's here, that's home, that's us.

BurnTheShips

Russian DNA Discoveries Proof of 12-Strand DNA Activation Theory

http://www.whalesinspace.com/2009/10/russian-dna-discoveries-proof-of-12-strand-dna-activation-theory/

Huh? Here is a Human Genome Project page from Oak Ridge National Laboratories:

http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/publicat/primer/prim1.html

DNA

In humans, as in other higher organisms, a DNA molecule consists of two strands that wrap around each other to resemble a twisted ladder whose sides, made of sugar and phosphate molecules, are connected by rungs of nitrogen- containing chemicals called bases. Each strand is a linear arrangement of repeating similar units called nucleotides, which are each composed of one sugar, one phosphate, and a nitrogenous base (Fig. 2: DNA Structure). Four different bases are present in DNA: adenine (A), thymine (T), cytosine (C), and guanine (G). The particular order of the bases arranged along the sugar- phosphate backbone is called the DNA sequence; the sequence specifies the exact genetic instructions required to create a particular organism with its own unique traits.

The two DNA strands are held together by weak bonds between the bases on each strand, forming base pairs (bp). Genome size is usually stated as the total number of base pairs; the human genome contains roughly 3 billion bp

How many is 1+1? How many strands do you see here?

How many fingers am I holding up?

BTS

40

Pale Blue Dot

by NomadSoul in

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lm6pehykhsfrom this distant vantage point, the earth might not seem of particular interest.

look again at that dot.

that's here, that's home, that's us.

BurnTheShips

http://www.keylonticdictionary.org/Words/1/12-Strand%20DNA.htm

DNA uses a base 4 alphabet composed of the 4 nucleobases. End of story. Show me published peer reviewed scientific literature from a respectable journal that lends any credence whatsoever to that gobbledygook posted above. I speak to leading scientists on a frequent basis whose research is DNA and cellular biology. What you have linked to here is misleading bullshit.

http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/Frontpage/2007/05/15/01569.html

Sitchen? Give me a break. Whatever nuggets of verifiable information that there may be in this article are buried under a mountain of bullshit.

Duodecimal (Base 12) Number System

http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&channel=s&hl=en&source=hp&q=base+12+dna&btnG=Google+Search#sclient=psy&hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US%3Aofficial&channel=s&q=base%2012%20number%20system&aq=0&aqi=g1&aql=f&oq=&gs_rfai=&pbx=1&fp=7b9141d

Base 12 number system gets lots of google hits. Big fricking deal. These number systems get lots of hits too, we must be moving towards "full disclosure."

Decimal (Base 10) Number System

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=decimal

Sexagesimal (Base 60) Number System

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=sexagesimal

Binary (Base 2) Number System

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=binary

Octal (Base 8) Number System

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=octal

Hexagesimal (Base 16) Number System

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=hexadecimal

Any first year math student could tell you that there are an infinite number of bases. Where is Bohm?

http://www.soulsofdistortion.nl/dna1.html

Really? Show me Dr. Pjotr Garjajev's curriculum vitae. It doesn't turn up anywhere. I am not ruling out that there may be some undiscovered quantum chemistry going on, but this source is full of unproven, unverified data...quackery.

Lookie here, it's Peter Gariav getting debunked for being a pseudoscientific quack!

http://www.scribd.com/doc/41804205/DAVID-ICKE’S-WAVE-GENETICS-THEORY-DEBUNKED

This is all pathological science.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pathological_science

Pathological science is the process in science in which "people are tricked into false results ... by subjective effects, wishful thinking or threshold interactions". [1] [2] The term was first used by Irving Langmuir, Nobel Prize-winning chemist, during a 1953 colloquium at the Knolls Research Laboratory. Langmuir said a pathological science is an area of research that simply will not "go away" —long after it was given up on as 'false' by the majority of scientists in the field. He called pathological science "the science of things that aren't so". [3]

Bart Simon lists it among practices pretending to be science: "categories [.. such as ..] pseudoscience, amateur science, deviant or fraudulent science, bad science, junk science, and popular science [..] pathological science, cargo-cult science, and voodoo science ..". [4] Examples of pathological science may include Martian "canals", N-rays, polywater, water memory, and cold fusion. The theories and conclusions behind all of these examples are currently rejected by the majority of scientists, with only a tiny number of exceptions.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pathological_science

BTS

40

Pale Blue Dot

by NomadSoul in

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lm6pehykhsfrom this distant vantage point, the earth might not seem of particular interest.

look again at that dot.

that's here, that's home, that's us.

BurnTheShips

10 were deactivated, heretofore known as "junk DNA"

"Junk DNA" is a something of a myth. This is DNA that does not code for proteins. Much of the noncoding, or "Junk" DNA has been found to have regulatory functions for the "non-Junk" DNA, for example. We are still discovering functionality. There are no 10 deactivated DNA anything in the real world. Your post is full of junk, not your DNA.

BTS

8

Worshiping an act itself

by WTWizard in

you probably heard of people worshiping people (such as a parent, a study conductor), things (crosses, money), or organizations (a church, the washtowel babble and crap slaveholdery).. i believe, however, there is one other thing one can worship: actions.

and, among the witlesses, the most common acts that are worshiped are field circus and boasting session attendance.

this happens when one believes that they are going to see one or more of their problems gone as long as they are attending every boasting session and/or doing excessive field circus.

BurnTheShips

Actions. And, among the witlesses, the most common acts that are worshiped are field circus and boasting session attendance.

You a genius.

BTS

40

Pale Blue Dot

by NomadSoul in

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lm6pehykhsfrom this distant vantage point, the earth might not seem of particular interest.

look again at that dot.

that's here, that's home, that's us.

BurnTheShips

BTS, so you think what I said CANNOT be true because it doesn't say so in Wikipedia? You can't be serious.

The point is....what you said was bullshit. 12 strands of DNA....2% of brain use....Neanderthals....all BULLSHIT.

If YOU think it makes sense that this is the only planet in the universe inhabited with human life, then go ahead and roll with it.

I never said that, all I said was how, in the name of fuck, do you know what there is or isn't with such mathematical certitude??

You don't have to try to make ME into a crazy man because something is beyond your comprehension.

You are apparently, batshit crazy, and yes, it is beyond my comprehension.

There are INFINITE dimensions that you have no clue about, but you WILL someday.

I will introduce you to an infinite dimension, but first......you must blow me.

BTS

40

Pale Blue Dot

by NomadSoul in

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lm6pehykhsfrom this distant vantage point, the earth might not seem of particular interest.

look again at that dot.

that's here, that's home, that's us.

BurnTheShips

Thank you BTS - I was just about to post the same thing, but you saved me the trouble.

Modified my post above with purty pictures. It's amazing people say these things in an age where Wikipedia is as free as air.

BTS

40

Pale Blue Dot

by NomadSoul in

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lm6pehykhsfrom this distant vantage point, the earth might not seem of particular interest.

look again at that dot.

that's here, that's home, that's us.

BurnTheShips

From what I understand, there are approximately 67 million inhabited worlds in the Milky Way Galaxy alone, and the predominant species in it is human. Although this is the case, the Earth IS INDEED special in that it is a free will planet, and many very important issues are being decided in this special time, the end of a 75,000 year cycle of evolution. The last time we had a quantum evolutionary leap, we went from Neanderthals to human embryos. We use only two percent of our brains because 10 of our 12 strands of DNA are not activated. We're about to become fully human, but the whole process may take hundreds of years. We're in unchartered territory so nobody really knows for sure how long it will take.

Many past "earths" have been destroyed by its inhabitants, and many of us were there to experience those things, but its not going to happen this time. We're moving past the cycle of needless cataclysms and heading into a far more advanced and godlike age of Oneness.

Huh? And how do you know this? Did Rah reveal it to you? And there are several factual errors in your post, on top of the crazy claims.

we went from Neanderthals to human embryos.

We never "went from Neanderthals to human embryos." They are a separate branch of the phylogenetic tree. We are not directly descended from Neanderthals (with the exception of a very small amount of possible hybridization), although we share a common ancestor.