http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=br31mdp8-ug.
the video is short but it proves that bush is a lier, period.
some of you can remember i was damned for posting information about this.
I took my wife out for dinner. Im back
Look at what Now Former President of Mexico Vincent Fox said on Larry King live. He admits the NAU
This is not from U Tube but taped from the Main stream TV channels
Vicente Fox Admits Plan for New North American Currency | The John ...
| Appearing on Larry King Live, former Mexican President Vicente Fox admits ... and plotting to merge the three nations into a North American Union (NAU). ... www.jbs.org/node/5940 - 14k - Cached - Similar pages |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=br31mdp8-ug.
the video is short but it proves that bush is a lier, period.
some of you can remember i was damned for posting information about this.
I have not been on this board since spring.
Boy I would of thought this information would have post after post. Turning the page on fire
Don't you guys see how big this is?
Is Seek 4 still on this board.. You know he aways liked to have fun with me. I would love to ask him about the video of the Manitoba congress stating it is true and even in 2008 they are planning driver license that will be valid in all three countries.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=br31mdp8-ug.
the video is short but it proves that bush is a lier, period.
some of you can remember i was damned for posting information about this.
Is this a real coin?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=br31mdp8-ug.
the video is short but it proves that bush is a lier, period.
some of you can remember i was damned for posting information about this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Br31mdP8-Ug
The video is short but it proves that BUSH is a Lier, period
Some of you can remember I was damned for posting information about this. Who's crazy now?
Like to know if you think this is a good thing for the US
Like to know from you up north do you think is a good thing.
I am still out one way or the other. What I do know is I do not like being lied to by the Bush administration. So I must conclude something is not right or Bush would ould not be lying to us.
there seems to be a lot of hostility on the board toward atheists still and a lot of comments floating around like atheists are to preachy.
well i want to take a quick minute and deal with some of these issues.
to begin with, to make any statement regarding atheists in general would be false for several reasons.
I like to heard myself type I guess. The answer might be that Gen. was not written by Moses but in exile in Babylon. Then the differences in the wording of man can be explained. Other wise you must assume that God created at least two different humans.
The original book of the bible that was around at the time of the Gen. says exactly that that many type of humans were created by the Elohim's
there seems to be a lot of hostility on the board toward atheists still and a lot of comments floating around like atheists are to preachy.
well i want to take a quick minute and deal with some of these issues.
to begin with, to make any statement regarding atheists in general would be false for several reasons.
What happens here is this we do not understand the original scriptures. Ha-Adam can mean "Earth-thing" so at Gen2 the Earth-Thing was created.
Today our language has changed Bad is Good, Wicked means good. If was to write a book today stating that ROCKY ROADS ICECREAM tasted Bad and wicked. A thousand years from now looking at the dictionary of the day we would conclude the Rocky roads ice cream taste really awful.
So we do not know if GOD was referring to the same man in Gens1 and in Gens2. The only way you can conclude that it is the same man is that Gen1 and Gen2 was written at a different date not at the same time. This way you could have two different words that mean the same man.
Here again Bible thumpers do not like this either.
there seems to be a lot of hostility on the board toward atheists still and a lot of comments floating around like atheists are to preachy.
well i want to take a quick minute and deal with some of these issues.
to begin with, to make any statement regarding atheists in general would be false for several reasons.
I have spent some time and scanned down through this thread.
To state I am agnostic/not an atheist. I do not like blinded people. Bible thumpers make me sick. Practically every friend I have is a bible thumper. Bible thumpers at least most of them are dumb. Why because facts mean nothing to them. For example for years on this board I have asked one simple question:
Gen 1: 27 God Created man and woman then in 1: 31 it says that completed the six day......
Then look at Gen 2:19 says Adam was created. What the Hell?
Every bible thumper has said in Gen: 2 he was giving a more in-depth description of creating Adam. This is Bull the bible does not say that. It states clearly that on the: On the six day he created man and woman: Then created Adam Two different words that mean man. actually Ha-Adam which literal transalation is "The Adam"
Look at the original meaning of man and you will find the Bibles word for man is different at times. One is a human that can blush, the other is a human with color. The original black man that you see in Africa can not blush. But the bible thumpers do not like this because it opens a big pile of worms. Only light colored man can blush.
So without changing the bible you either have in chapter one the Neanderthals or a different race of man than you have in chapter two.
i liked this post, it's thoughtful and say s exactly what it should.
i agree, too.
i hate the fact that in some places local to me, we are only allowed white lights around trees, very benign things that don't point obviously to christmas.
Common sense, what the HELL let kill him. At least protest in front of his house.
Common people lets go. I'll bring the rope. Ben Stein you can run but you can't hide.
i come on tonight to see i had one new pm.
come to find out, it is from evidently who has been signed up on the board for over a year but has never posted.
this guy used to be an old boss of mine from way back when - i'd say around 12 years ago or so.
Come on you can to it. Hurry up. We are waiting.
in my last 2 years in field service in australia tax laws meant we could no longer offer publications for money or directly ask for a donation.
if the householder asks, we would explain our voluntry work was paid for by donations.
i was suprised how many people would give you $10 or $20 dollars thinking it's going to some good cause....however, i would go and buy some lunch at mc donald's.
I am sorry there is noway I could of done that. Flat wrong.
With that said good for you. I am styping with a huge smile on my face.
