Posts by OnTheWayOut

  • EdenOne
    233

    What is BELIEF ?

    by EdenOne in
    1. watchtower
    2. beliefs

    stemming from the 'absentheism' thread, an old question came to my mind.

    what exactly is "belief"?.

    is it the same to ask: "do you believe in god?

    1. Chris Hannover
    2. talesin
    3. Finkelstein
  • OnTheWayOut
    OnTheWayOut

    It really is the same-old same-old arguments. Christians insist on personal anecdotes as evidence for their God and they, along with others, insist on hardcore evidence from nonbelievers that God doesn't exist. This is because they know such evidence couldn't possibly exist.

    There is at least an equal amount of anecdotal evidence that the god of Christianity doesn't exist as there are personal anecdotes that "He" does exist - the inaction in many circumstances and allowing of evil upon his worshippers. And believers know good and well that fantastical stories about Superman, Santa Claus, other gods, etc. allow them to dismiss belief without the same type of evidence they demand from nonbelievers in their fantastical God.

  • EdenOne
    233

    What is BELIEF ?

    by EdenOne in
    1. watchtower
    2. beliefs

    stemming from the 'absentheism' thread, an old question came to my mind.

    what exactly is "belief"?.

    is it the same to ask: "do you believe in god?

    1. Chris Hannover
    2. talesin
    3. Finkelstein
  • OnTheWayOut
    OnTheWayOut

    "Belief" or "believing in" someone or something is just as the opening post said. Also, "faith/faith-in". And it varies a bit from person to person. Having been on the other side of "belief in God," I get that many will continue to have belief. I might debate on the forum, but I really know that people are on their own journey and I won't browbeat those that don't insist on their beliefs being put upon others.

    But as former JW's, we need to understand the passion of those who are sure they are right. I have occasionally not reminded myself of that and I will try harder.

    Certainly, belief in some kind of creator is vastly different than the fire-and-brimstone preaching of hard core Christians or Muslims. Most "believers" are closing the gaps on the god-of-the-gaps and accepting what science offers, but just not letting go of an intelligence behind it all. I admire their optimism.

  • Garrett
    45

    Being in a cult - what good did it do?

    by Garrett in
    1. jw
    2. friends

    so, here's a bit of a different point of view.

    while most of us will agree that our time within the jw cult was rather terrible, however, i'd like to look at another aspect.

    did anything good come out of being in a cult and then waking up from it?.

    1. Hold Me-Thrill Me
    2. freemindfade
    3. Black Man
  • OnTheWayOut
    OnTheWayOut

    I never look at things the way the opening post asks.
    Example: The World Trade Center buildings came crashing down on Sept. 11, 2001, but a NYC firefighter/paramedic dragged a victim out and had to stay with the victim all the way to the emergency room. That same firefighter/paramedic met a nurse that day and they fell in love and married and have a ten and an eight year old child today.
    I don't see that as a reason to say "It wasn't all bad." I could also have put my example in the Nazi prison camps.

    Any good that came of it was "IN SPITE OF IT," not credited to the cult. The price overall for any good was too high.

  • flipper
    59

    Kendrick " Letter of Introduction " from Elders regarding Candace Conti Case

    by flipper in
    1. watchtower
    2. child-abuse

    as many of us saw in the pbs news hour program and the abc news nightline program the elders from one congregation failed to communicate properly to the elders in another congregation concerning the child molester jonathan kendrick when he moved to a new congregation.

    i have parts of this " introduction letter " from the fremont congregation to the oakley congregation elders so you can read it for yourself and decide how irresponsible these wt appointed elders were.

    dated 1/16/98 it opens : .

    1. JWdaughter
    2. Finkelstein
    3. flipper
  • OnTheWayOut
    OnTheWayOut
    I am with Cofty:
    I am stunned!
    They sent a known pedophile to a new congregation with a commendation for his work with children.
    They are criminally negligent.

    Other things about the letter. They basically say:
    Brother Kendricks is a fine brother. He was placed on restrictions for bursts of anger during his divorce, but HEY- She didn't submit well to his headship, allowed her daughter to date a worldly person and the daughter got pregnant. Wouldn't any good brother have outbursts when such violations of (Watchtower's) Jehovah's will take place? She's gone from his life and she is inactive now, so he was justified in all that- just blame it all on the woman. After-all, Adam did it.

    Brother Kendricks has been away from Watchtower drones for months, so any other problems you see with him will clear up if he hangs out with JW's, especially children. He loves children. He plays the violin. Such a great brother. Any problems at all with him are due to that witch he was married to and discouragement from proper counsel he received only because we had to. He'll be fine, I would let him babysit my kids.

  • Viva la Vida
    13

    IMPORTANT: JW Congregation in Britain loses case!!!!!!

    by Viva la Vida in
    1. jw
    2. friends

    from the ruling: .

    "we note that the congregation and the charity are one and the same entity in this case, so that whilst the congregation understandably wishes to follow its religious practices, its status as a registered charity brings with it, in exchange for public recognition and tax reliefs, a requirement to maintain certain standards of behaviour.

    it also brings with it the risk that, if there are concerns about its activities, these might be inquired into by the respondent.

    1. defender of truth
    2. defender of truth
    3. OnTheWayOut
  • OnTheWayOut
    OnTheWayOut

    This was all I had to read from the news summary of the story:

    It had emerged that victims of sexual abuse by a former trustee of that congregation had been required to meet and answer questions from their abuser, who had just been released from the prison he was given for abusing them, a tribunal documentshows.

    That has the ring of truth to it. Watchtower thinks it is more important to establish whether or not a member has violated some rules and needs judicial matters to proceed than it is to protect sexual abuse victims from further psychological damage, so it forces them to face questions from their abuser.