as yk is now claiming an erroneous victory, typical of his pattern, i am compelled to finally respond to his original post. i had previously stated that i would like a public acknowledgement of his lies and slander before i addressed it, but i realize that is just an unrealistic expectation, and i can no longer bite my tongue (due to the fact that his original post is so extremely flawed and easily refuted). i cant help it, i have no self control!
But, just how do you suppose that any of those calamities compares with the now looming threat of a nuclear war and the collapse of the global financial system?
so, yk claims that NONE of the previous calamities compares with the "now looming threat of a nuclear war" but wait, yk reserves the right to immediately contradict his own statement......
no situation arose, other than the Cuban Missile Crisis, that posed any sort of threat that someone might launch their nukes.
what do you know, a past situation that DID INDEED pose an immediate threat of a nuclear war! so, the present crisis is unique, with this one exception, LOL. too easy. oh but wait, not so fast....yk is going to tell us why that one doesnt count (this is good stuff).....
Now, though, we have a completely different and unique situation that changes that entire scenario.
OH, OF COURSE!!
there is always a completely different and unique situation.....thats what the passing of time brings, and what everyone has said about a million times. what, the unique situation we have now means destroying the world with nukes would be extremely more dangerous than destroying the world with nukes wouldve been then? okay, i get it.
aa
Edited by - dubla on 14 June 2002 12:54:53