Posts by dubla

(In any case, even if true, since when is consorting with terrorists - even being 'good buddies' with them - a reason to treat someone as Satan himself?

since when? since 9/11.

aa

131

France is a "Pain in the Ass"

by JH in

jw
friends

i changed my topic to this:.

why does france always go against britain and us policies?

should we still consider france as an ally?

dubla

xander-

yeah, youre probably right.....i doubt a person like saddam could ever do any real harm with a few nuclear weapons.....i dont really know why anyone is even concerned.

aa

131

France is a "Pain in the Ass"

by JH in

jw
friends

i changed my topic to this:.

why does france always go against britain and us policies?

should we still consider france as an ally?

dubla

moe-

Now tell me, do YOU think it is a good idea Saddam's ass sits on a wealth of biological weapons? Do YOU think it is a good idea he sits on nuclear weapons?

dont forget that some of these anti-war posters are so naive that they actually believe saddam does NOT posses any such weapons.

aa

Edited by - dubla on 22 January 2003 15:40:51

280

UN FINDS WMD...OK saddam lovers, what now?

by dolphman in

ok lets hear your pathetic excuses.

c'mon now don't be shy.

let's hear what you have to say.

dubla

But George W pretends he doesn't know what Saddam will do.

ive never got that feeling from his statements....in fact, quite the contrary. bush has continually implied that he doesnt believe saddam will comply......he knows where its headed, and i dont really think hes tried to hide that. you dont send over as many troops as he is and try to pretend youre not preparing for war.

aa

131

France is a "Pain in the Ass"

by JH in

jw
friends

i changed my topic to this:.

why does france always go against britain and us policies?

should we still consider france as an ally?

dubla

realist-

the democrates would do the same thing as bush by the way.

i take that to mean they wouldnt be able to do any better in this environment.....and for once i agree with you.

aa

280

UN FINDS WMD...OK saddam lovers, what now?

by dolphman in

ok lets hear your pathetic excuses.

c'mon now don't be shy.

let's hear what you have to say.

dubla

realist-

you made an unsupported claim...therefore it is you who has to show evidence supporting it ...

i made no such claim....i merely said "for all i know"....did i say, "hussein is most definitely linked to 9/11"?? no i didnt, i simply suggested it was possible, which i believe it is. do i know for sure that he was involved? really i have no idea.......again, i just think its a strong possibility. now why do i need evidence to back up my opinion of this possibility?

if i for instance claim there are little green man on mars than it is on me to prove it...not on others to disprove me.

if you told me "for all i know, there are little green men out there somewhere"....i would have to say you are entitled to that opinion, and there is no way for either of us to prove it one way or the other.

i don't think hussein believes he can win this war. he tells his people he will win...which is not quite the same.

well then, id have to say lying to your own people and sending them off into certain death, all the while making them believe they could win the war, would also constitute madness on some level.

this is not a religious discussion....i don't love hussein and i don't regard him as God ...therefore i am open to rational arguments.

what does religion have to do with it? sure youre open to rational arguments.....but you made two statements that DIRECTLY contradicted each other. did you or did you not say that he had NEVER done anything irrational? then you turned around and specifically labeled one of his actions irrational.

but that doesn't mean necessarily that he was irrational or crazy.

again, your previous statement was not "he isnt irrational in general"...your statement was that he had NEVER done anything irrational. can you see the difference? the fact that you even contradict yourself so blatantly casts doubt on your entire stance.

aa

131

France is a "Pain in the Ass"

by JH in

jw
friends

i changed my topic to this:.

why does france always go against britain and us policies?

should we still consider france as an ally?

dubla

everyone knows he's eager to go to war to divert attention from his dismal performance on the home front (i.e. economy, joblessness, etc.).

yes, its all bushs fault, the economy, unemployment, etc......because it really does only take two years and very few changes in economic policy to send a country into a recession.....WAKE UP. the economy was headed for this, bush didnt send us into it. i love how the democrats (not that this poster is a democrat) took credit for the booming economy that reagan built, and then shirk the blame off onto bush for the tumble clinton sent it into.

aa

280

UN FINDS WMD...OK saddam lovers, what now?

by dolphman in

ok lets hear your pathetic excuses.

c'mon now don't be shy.

let's hear what you have to say.

dubla

realist-

i also wanted to point out your own contradiction here.....your quotes:

he never did anything unrational....he is in charge since a quater of a century!

i have to agree that it was irrational not to withdrew from kuwait....

hmmmm.......

aa

280

UN FINDS WMD...OK saddam lovers, what now?

by dolphman in

ok lets hear your pathetic excuses.

c'mon now don't be shy.

let's hear what you have to say.

dubla

realist-

sorry, was away for a bit, but still wanted to respond.....

i am sorry i don't see you showing ANY evidence for what you say.

these have just been my personal opinions of hussein.....i dont need evidence to back up an opinion.....you dont have evidence that disproves anything ive said, just as i dont have the evidence to prove it.

everyone will agree that the CIA is trying as hard as possible to link hussein to the 911 attack....they failed to do so.
therefore as far as we know Hussein had of course nothing to do with it.

hey, if the cia was as capable as you make them out to be, we wouldve found bin laden by now too. just because they havent linked him (or at least publicly) to the attacks means little.

in the immanent war thousadns of innocent iraqies will die and not a single US plane will be lost!

i agree with you....but the fact that hussein thinks he can win that war is proof enough that hes a madman.

i have to agree that it was irrational not to withdrew from kuwait.....perhaps he even thought he has a chance?

your own words prove my point.....only a madman would NOT have withdrawn from kuwait much earlier, and only a madman would think "he has a chance" as you put it. enough said.

aa