nytelecom-
i find it interesting that you quoted this snippet......
I would imagine the mere fact that you visit this site would be grounds for disfellowshipping, or at least, what they used to call, "pulic reproving", or at least taking away your microphone and selling literature behind the counter duties.
......and didnt really reply to it. would you visiting this site be such grounds? would {associating with/talking to} disfellowshipped and dissaccociated ones on a daily basis be such grounds? i dont think the post began as you leading a double life, indeed this may be a subject to devote an entirely new thread to. i think they are valid questions though, as i think the questions ive posed to you on this thread are valid. you seem to conveniently avoid the questions that you do not wish to or cannot answer, and just throw in your two cents where you please. a discussion normally calls for two sides, and each side exchanges {ideas/questions} that the {opposing/other} side then proceeds to respond to. can you carry on in a discussion such as what ive described? or are you relegated to question dodging?
I am going against the very grain that many of you hold dear too. The fact that dubs are brainwashed.
please elaborate on this idea for me as well. how are you going against that grain that many of us "hold dear to"? you mean by going against the org. and the counsel from the podium, that is your way of free thinking? (and if this isnt a clear cut example of living a double life, i dont know what is. but again, another time, another thread perhaps.) id be interested to know what you meant here (among other things id be interested in you responding to).
aa