hey folks.
why is it that all americans are so damn pro - israel ?.
israel is totally against the united states; they are just using america for their own selfish gains.
dubla knows what he saw. the fbi cliams its genuine, so it has to be that, genuine
no, no, no, you guys have got it all wrong. you see, i believe nothing that comes from the fbi is genuine, and i believe almost all media sources produce nothing other than blatant lies. in fact, i believe the only true source of any real information comes from conspiracy theory websites, and everything else it patently false. i dont sound like im under mind control, or overly paranoid, do i?
aa
hey folks.
why is it that all americans are so damn pro - israel ?.
israel is totally against the united states; they are just using america for their own selfish gains.
The Pentagon video of Bin Laden clearly shows a man with full facial features and a wide nose.
tom cruise then?
aa
hey folks.
why is it that all americans are so damn pro - israel ?.
israel is totally against the united states; they are just using america for their own selfish gains.
Isreal orchestrated the attacks, Bin Laden had nothing to do with them.
well, the videotape i watched showed bin laden praising the success of the attacks, and laughing about the fact that some of the hijackers werent even informed that they were on a suicide mission. that must have been one hell of a make-up job.....i wonder who played bin laden? tom cruise?
aa
i thought for sure someone would post something...there have to be a few of you out there who love ncaa basketball tournament time...or am i just slow and i missed it?
anyway...we are already at the sweet 16, so who do you like that's left?
my picks- kentuckypitsburghkansasuconnmich st.butler (i have to have one upset don't i?)syracusearizona.
notre dame and butler.....go indiana!
in my office pool bracket ive got arizona over texas in the final. pretty unfun picks, i know, but i figure go with the odds (#1 seeds) when theres money on the line.
aa
hey folks.
why is it that all americans are so damn pro - israel ?.
israel is totally against the united states; they are just using america for their own selfish gains.
Bin Laden is innocent.
LMAO.
aa
back when i joined the site i had lots of concerns and i was given some great advice by some special people here.
i'll miss you.
but the time has come for me to move on.
comment retracted.
back when i joined the site i had lots of concerns and i was given some great advice by some special people here.
i'll miss you.
but the time has come for me to move on.
lb-
sorry to see you go, but i completely understand where you are coming from on this, and its unfortunate. maybe as others have suggested, a break would be better.
aa
i've just seen the al-jazeera footage.
its truly shocking.
there were about 6-7 us soldiers.
ashi-
i would have to disagree....if mccain wouldve ran as an independent, he couldve stolen a lot of republican votes from bush. mccain won the election for bush by joining sides with him.
aa
ok lets hear your pathetic excuses.
c'mon now don't be shy.
let's hear what you have to say.
you speculate saddam is a mad man, i speculate bush is primarily interested in the oil.
yes, but now we both know saddam is irrational, as shown by his willingness to stay in iraq and die with a dying regime.....and those were your stipulations for proving his "irrationality".
aa
ok lets hear your pathetic excuses.
c'mon now don't be shy.
let's hear what you have to say.
if hussein would have left than there would be no threat...hence no occupation of iraq.
not true.....the u.s. has already said that even if saddam left the country, we would still continue our occupation until a complete regime change was in place. now, if the entire regime stepped down, thats different, and wouldve possibly had a different outcome. like i said, we will never know because saddam was unwilling to even discuss this. saying that saddam might have secretly talked about surrender/exile is the only fabrication that you are clinging to at this point, and there is absolutely zero evidence to support your views whatsoever. in contrast, there is evidence to back my view that he never had any intention of considering exile, including multiple statements/promises from saddam himself on the matter. if you believe he considered exile, the burden of proof is on you to show it, which you cannot. but hey, its all about our original argument, isnt it? that being, whether or not saddam is a "rational" man. you can keep clinging to that belief, i wont hold it against you, lol.
aa
