Sorry Rebel I couldn't resist. Do you have a University near you? If so email their science department and ask about your concerns I am sure they can find someone to address your concerns. They actually love questions from John Q Public.
truthseeker100
JoinedPosts by truthseeker100
-
579
Won't get fooled again ...Moon Landing.
by The Rebel inso i was fooled by the witnesses.
what can i learn from that?
not to accept things at face value but to seek out opinion and different view points.. hence my question " do you believe man landed on the moon?.
-
-
-
579
Won't get fooled again ...Moon Landing.
by The Rebel inso i was fooled by the witnesses.
what can i learn from that?
not to accept things at face value but to seek out opinion and different view points.. hence my question " do you believe man landed on the moon?.
-
-
truthseeker100
Sir 82:The scary thing is that people utterly incapable of determining whether the moon landings were real or not, are going to be electing the next POTUS, with (among other things) the trigger finger on the nuclear arsenal.
This is why Donald Trump is the leading GOP candidate as of now.
LOL Scary isn't it.
Grab your tinfoil hats conspiracy theorist Donald Trump is going to be our next Commander and Chief he already knows how the Rothschild's et al control the globe. You can see it in the images written on American Currency. Chem trails are actually put there for a diversion to get our attention away from the new world take over of the elite. Alex Jones https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Jones_(radio_host) has covered it already.
Don't even get me started on the communist plots under-way.
-
81
Did you hear that!? His Honour is insisting that Jackson attend the Royal Commission
by umbertoecho ini actually started clapping at that point, as his honour explained to the wt type creep sycophantic slithery lawyer that........" i understand that we all have issues to face in life and .....that is a part of life...........however it has become obvious that this man ....is in such a position to assist with this investigation.....".
it boils down to the fact that stewart outright accused the latest witness of misleading the royal commission and this lead to some document searches which led his honour to conclude that they had been protecting mr jackson.
this was a warm and fluffy moment folks.................brilliant stuff!!!!!
-
-
truthseeker100
I think if he is forced to testify he'll fake a heart attack or some other ailment that will require a long term rehabilitation and then he can claim the I don't recall defense. -
449
Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific
by LAWHFol ini have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
-
-
truthseeker100
406 do I hear 450? Going once going twice. 500!! LOL -
1
What will this mean to the future of the Internet?
by truthseeker100 ini read articles like this and wonder what effect it will have on the future of the internet.
will the internet stay as free as it is now or will it lessen?.
i am sure there are many on this site who have a greater knowledge of the implications of this than i do so is this anything we need to worry about?
-
-
truthseeker100
I read articles like this and wonder What effect it will have on the future of the internet. Will the internet stay as free as it is now or will it lessen?
I am sure there are many on this site who have a greater knowledge of the implications of this than I do so is this anything we need to worry about? Not just for ex JW's but for everyone.
https://in.news.yahoo.com/icann-posts-proposal-end-us-171818173.html
-
449
Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific
by LAWHFol ini have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
-
-
truthseeker100
Ding! Ding! I have 350 do I hear 4? -
449
Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific
by LAWHFol ini have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
-
-
truthseeker100
If he doesn't take it I could sure use a bottle of single malt. -
449
Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific
by LAWHFol ini have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
-
-
truthseeker100
306 posts arguing over labels and still no conclusion to the arguments. I don't use it myself but maybe some medical marijuana could help in this arena. LOL -
23
MAS370 - Was it a Remote Hijacking?
by fulltimestudent inprofessor kevin barrett is not exactly the most trusted commentator you could find, but that, of course, just maybe because, there are people who want his views on 9/11 to be ignored.. anyway he's advanced a theory that the missing malaysian airlines plane was remotely hi-jacked.
in the absence of other evidence, it just maybe what happened.
to consider whether it did happen, we need to ask why it may have been hijacked?
-
-
truthseeker100
Did anyone see 60 minutes tonight? There was a big story all about US satellites and the Chinese governments efforts to shoot them down. A prominent US General made it very clear that they can track even a very small fishing boat anywhere on the planet.
Doesn't it seem strange that they couldn't track a huge airliner? Something just doesn't seem right.
-
16
Does the .Org have the gall to ignore the RC?
by Lemonp ini have been mulling over the options that the wt has to take in regard to child abuse.
in my mind there are the following ones:.
1. overhaul their entire system, and apologize to all abuse victims.
-
-
truthseeker100
LisaRose: That is a very good idea Orphan Crow, but I don't know if anyone in the ex JW community has the expertise or ability to do that.
That is a good idea! Although many of us ex JWs may not have the expertise and ability specific to advising JW children abuse victims, we all know the witnesses more than most of the professionals do. I and many others for example can tell what they are going to say before they open their mouths. Perhaps some kind of a melding of knowledge between the professionals and apostates could be as effective as the Australian Royal Commission has been thus far.