Cold Steel

Joined

• started 158 topics
• posted 2,168 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Cold Steel

• 
  11

  Another Blood Question

  by Cold Steel in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  village idiot » by the way, [one's wife] can be disfellowshipped for allowing her child to have a transfusion.. just a side question here, but what if the husband allows a child to receive a transfusion over the objection of the wife?.

  let's say the wife joins the jws but the husband doesn't?

  then, nine years later the husband allows their child to receive the transfusion.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Cold Steel

  Yes, AR-10s might have an adverse effect on a pushy elder, but I've been told when it comes to JWs and blood that it's not unusual for church authorities to show up not only to counsel the members and act as go-betweens. One fiend who worked emergency rooms I a metropolitan area said that if they could get to the members or the parents before the church leaders, they could usually influence them in the right direction. But once the church guys showed up, it was a different ball of wax.

  The staff would do everything they could to separate the parents or patients from the church authorities while the doctors counseled them, and they'd also bring in chaplains to try to explain why the JW biblical exegesis was not only wrong, but destructive.

  Members who needed blood were more likely to sacrifice their own lives than those who had children who needed blood. And apparently JW parents who lost children that could have been saved were more likely to be divorced in the painful months that followed. So yes, it's a topic that interests me.

  My friend said he never had a case where the father wanted to save a child and the mother wanted to let it die. If the father was for blood transfusion, the mother always went with it. Once the elders, or whoever, arrived on the scene it was another story. They did everything they could to keep the doctors and other medical staff at bay, and as for the chaplains, it was get em outta here! There's the door!

  Nice guys.
• 
  27

  Jehovah's Witnesses and Love

  by Cold Steel in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  comments?

  stories?

  reminiscences?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Cold Steel

  konceptual99 » I think there can be a lot of love amongst Witnesses. The problem is that it is conditional.

  Among the JWs is one thing. How are they at helping those outside of the sect? Do they limit the groceries to those on the inside or do they help people on the outside? How about earthquake relief and flood relief? Are we likely to see JWs involved in these?

  
  
  
• 
  11

  Another Blood Question

  by Cold Steel in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  village idiot » by the way, [one's wife] can be disfellowshipped for allowing her child to have a transfusion.. just a side question here, but what if the husband allows a child to receive a transfusion over the objection of the wife?.

  let's say the wife joins the jws but the husband doesn't?

  then, nine years later the husband allows their child to receive the transfusion.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Cold Steel

  TD » Assuming this is something weighing on your mind, I could explain in more detail when you come back through that Stargate.....

  I'm back and I'm watching the thread. If it's something you don't mind sharing, I'd like to hear it. It's one of the less endearing traits of the sect and I have a difficult time seeing the reasoning.

  
  
• 
  16

  Why does Jehovah choose certain people to rule with him in heaven?

  by iWant2Learn in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  in other words, what good works have the 144000 done to be secured a place in heaven?

  i am told they have already been chosen.

  does that mean that jehovah also knows our future?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Cold Steel

  Different religions have different ways of looking at the 144,000, most viewing them as representatives of the twelve tribes of Israel, 12,000 from each tribe. These will serve as representatives that go out into the world to gather the remnants of Israel prior to the return of Christ. These will not be appointed forever, but only until their missions are complete. The Jehovah's Witnesses employ what's called replacement theology in which as all New Testament references, promises and blessings to the twelve tribes of Israel are replaced and given instead to the body of Christ, that is, the church. It is used by a number of Christian sects, mostly those that were formed before the signing of the Balfour Declaration (November 2, 1917), which was the beginning of recognizing Palestine as the reestablished nation of Israel. Isaiah and other prophets had prophesied Israel would be gathered from the nations of the earth (see Isaiah 11, for example).

  But the Jehovah's Witnesses were formed before Israel formally became a nation in 1949. And since Israel did not exist, replacement theology was the only logical fulfillment of these prophecies. Sadly, when Israel became a nation, their doctrine was already set in stone! Thus, if they were to reapply those prophecies to Israel, it would make them appear to be revamping their eschatology.

  John wrote: “And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on Mount Zion, and with him an hundred forty and four thousand, having his Father’s name written in their foreheads.” (Revelation 14:1) According to both the Old and New Testaments, when Yahweh returns to the earth, he will stand upon the Mount of Olives (Mount Zion). See Zechariah 12, 14 and Revelation 11. The two prophets raised up to the Jewish people at that time have just been killed, but after three and a half days life enters into them and they stand upon their feet and ascend to meet the returning Savior. Jesus' feet stand upon the Mount of Olives and with him the 144,000.

  The JWs have centered their entire doctrine on themselves, however, and this is a problem. It's best to read the scriptures and try to piece them together with a clean sheet of paper. If you begin a journey with a bad map, where you begin and where you end up will be in error. As I read some of their prophecies, and their exegeses, I'm flabbergasted at the liberties they take.
• 
  18

  Colossians and The Gospel of Thomas - a work in progress

  by Doug Mason in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  as i prepare the pre-draft stage of my study into the evolutions of salvation, i have drafted a chapter on colossians and on the gospel of thomas.

  http://www.jwstudies.com/colossians_soteriologies.pdf.

  http://www.jwstudies.com/the_soteriology_of_thomas.pdf.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Cold Steel

  The above links are bad. Here are some working ones.

  Forty Day Ministry

  February 12, 1964 by Hugh Nibley

  Lecture given February 12, 1964.

  Listen to recording:

  Part 1

  Part 2

  Even though the lecture was given in 1964, the info is still relevant. Since it was given, the topic is still studiously avoided in theological circles.
• 
  18

  Colossians and The Gospel of Thomas - a work in progress

  by Doug Mason in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  as i prepare the pre-draft stage of my study into the evolutions of salvation, i have drafted a chapter on colossians and on the gospel of thomas.

  http://www.jwstudies.com/colossians_soteriologies.pdf.

  http://www.jwstudies.com/the_soteriology_of_thomas.pdf.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Cold Steel

  Here's an interesting aspect of the gospel message based on other extra-biblical records that many scholars still want no part of. In fact, I've never seen it covered by the JWs in any of its literature...based on Acts 1:3.

  Hugh Nibley. “The Forty Day Ministry.” Talk given at BYU Feb. 12, 1964, in mp3 format. Click here for part 1, here for part 2.

  
  

  
  
  

  
  
  
• 
  11

  Another Blood Question

  by Cold Steel in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  village idiot » by the way, [one's wife] can be disfellowshipped for allowing her child to have a transfusion.. just a side question here, but what if the husband allows a child to receive a transfusion over the objection of the wife?.

  let's say the wife joins the jws but the husband doesn't?

  then, nine years later the husband allows their child to receive the transfusion.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Cold Steel

  Village Idiot » By the way, [one's wife] can be disfellowshipped for allowing her child to have a transfusion.

  Just a side question here, but what if the husband allows a child to receive a transfusion over the objection of the wife?

  Let's say the wife joins the JWs but the husband doesn't? Then, nine years later the husband allows their child to receive the transfusion. And let's say the child is being raised a JW?

  Or let's say they were both JWs but the husband left? Would she face any repercussions for not divorcing him before this became an issue?

  Now here's another hypothetical. Both are JW converts, but their son is 15 and doesn't want any part of the religion. If they decided he was old enough to make his own decision, and they let him, could either be DFed? What if either had a parent who wasn't a JW, but needed a transfusion. Would the parent not being a JW be a mitigating factor?

  I've been told that in situations involving blood transfusions, the KHs send people to the hospitals very quickly to take control of situations in which one or both parents may weaken in their resolve. I've always wondered how often that happens, that parents weaken. If they do, can they be forgiven? Does it normally take the decision of both parents to deny a child blood? And would it be possible to allow the transfusion and just not tell the elders? (For example, if a member simply disagreed with the policy.)

  I imagine it would be tough to watch a child die by withholding blood, and especially if you did so and later figured out that the religion wasn't all it cracked up to be.
• 
  16

  The GB wants us to read this bible passage to you!

  by StephaneLaliberte in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  i had a brother visit me yesterday to invite me to the memorial.

  as usual, despite the unspoken passive aggressiveness, i was polite,.

  anyway, this year, he started his presentation by saying: "the governing body (gb) wants us to read this bible passage to you!

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Cold Steel

  Steve2 » I wanted to get on a plane to the States and tell these loving men in person that I love them too.

  And we love you for loving them!

  Sniff...sniff!

  Isn't it great when we all can just live together?

  
  
• 
  16

  The GB wants us to read this bible passage to you!

  by StephaneLaliberte in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  i had a brother visit me yesterday to invite me to the memorial.

  as usual, despite the unspoken passive aggressiveness, i was polite,.

  anyway, this year, he started his presentation by saying: "the governing body (gb) wants us to read this bible passage to you!

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Cold Steel

  It's all about power and the consolidation thereof. People want to hear the word of God, and the GB is now the only source for Jehovah's Witnesses, even though they've said time and again that they receive neither revelation nor inspiration. For better or for worse, the GB is the only existing chain of command and is the faithful slave that feeds God's people. So if there is communication from God, it will come through the GB.

  I have it through an unimpeachable source, though, that Armageddon is right around the corner...in this generation.
• 
  6

  If There is no God is Murder Wrong? - Michael Shermer

  by cofty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  a very useful 8 minute talk on a topic that is raised frequently by believers in this forum.. ....

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Cold Steel

  Plato refuted nothing. If there is no God, murder is not wrong, cannot be wrong nor can it ever be wrong. Why? Because there are no eternal consequences. Man can codify murder, establish penalties, but he cannot establish the morality of murder. Only God can be the arbiter of murder because He knows all things; He knows what is in our hearts and minds, and He has established the laws and penalties of iniquity.

  The Divine Command Theory is only a small part of the picture. Man can dictate law, but not morality. Fifty years ago, homosexuality was considered immoral. A hundred years ago, adultery was immoral. And twenty years from now pedophilia may be considered morally acceptable. And the scriptures tell us that when Jesus returns, the earth will be as it was in the days of Noah -- that is, it will be wicked beyond redemption.

  Smiddy » If God so loved the world he gave his only begotten son John 3:16 , I presume he meant the whole world so why did he for at least four centuries favour the Israelites over all other nations that then existed?

  Because the Israelites were receptive to God, and they were chosen before the world was. Jeremiah was told, "Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations." (Jeremiah 1:5) In the New Testament, Jesus said, “I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel." (Matthew 15:24), yet after his resurrection, the gospel was taken from the Jews and sent to the gentiles. And when the gentiles reject the gospel, it will go back to the Jews, and the first shall be last and the last shall be first.

  And himself being responsible for the death of millions of people who were not his chosen people ?

  The God of Israel disciplined many people by removing them from mortality, even among his people. The term "murder" applies to shedding innocent blood. If a people were to kill their own offspring by sacrificing them in the fires of Molech or through abortions, they would be ripe for destruction and it would be a judgment, not murder.

  According to the bible he he was responsible for creating seperate nations when he confused the languages at Babel

  That's because He wanted them to spread out and to fill the earth, not congregate in one place. The people were rebellious and angry over God's decision to flood the earth. The confusion of the languages did what it was supposed to do and caused the people to dissipate.

  Jehovah God murdered millions of people before the birth of Jesus Christ.
  

  Uh-huh. Name one.