has anyone on here ever come across the tiniest shred of evidence supporting this date for the fall of jerusalem.
i understand rolf furuli is about to but something out on this subject (see elihubooks.com), however even a table of contents has been a long time in coming from this site.
if no evidence exists what can he possibly be writing about?
Thank you Jeffro I have read your finding and I must say they are very interesting, I am very keen to look more deeply in to them.
Hi AK - Jeff I am just a person who has been challanged to research in to the 607 - 587 BCE issue, this started as a mutual interest between me and a drifting JW friend but now I find my self compeled to look more deeply in to this subject.
has anyone on here ever come across the tiniest shred of evidence supporting this date for the fall of jerusalem.
i understand rolf furuli is about to but something out on this subject (see elihubooks.com), however even a table of contents has been a long time in coming from this site.
if no evidence exists what can he possibly be writing about?
ok I just had to post a reply to this subject.....
the reply is to long to post so please follow the link, it will take you to a site that really does explain in detail about the biblical proof as to why Jehovahs Witnesses believe that 607 bce is the correct date.
this is not my work & I have nothing to do with the site I have linked, but it really does show alot of info as to why 607 BCE is believed to be the correct date.
