well i guess todays the big day.
another alignment elenin-earth-sun which the last three coincided with major eathquakes.
a lot of hype on youtube about elenin.
Well I guess todays the big day. Another alignment elenin-earth-sun which the last three coincided with major eathquakes. A lot of hype on youtube about elenin. But apparently, it desintegrated, and will not be a threat after all. Ah man!! I was looking forward to a good show.
Apparently, now we're really entering the time of the end.
Heads up..lol
yes apparently the staff at the twin towers on 9/11 didn't notice the explosives strapped to all the beams on each floor......of course a plane fully loaded with jet fuel going so fast it nearly flew through the building {blew out the otherside} would not be enough to cause a collapse.
the building were glowing red!
people jumped due to the heat and smoke.
Well Leolaia, thanks for the videos, your stuff is always well researched. Very interesting that you introduced something that I hadn't heard of before which makes the explanation of how WTC1 and 2 fell (for me anyway) much simpler. Your last videos show some buildings being demolished using the verinage method, which involves removing structural support of one or several floors, leaving enough mass above to allow gravity to do the rest.
For each building, the choice of which floors you will remove is somewhat critical. Choose the wrong floor and it might not come down the way you thought it would. Especially with tall buildings like the WTC.
So if those planes hit the floors that would have been required to be removed (within a certain range I'm sure) with the verinage method of demolition for WTC 1 & 2, then someone knew what they were doing. And obviously someone knew, cause those buildings came down like a charm. I don't know if the planes themselves could have caused enough damage to the floors to accomplish this, but if they did, you're right no need for explosives, once those damaged floors had received enough stress, the buildings were coming down. Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, lol.
So that answers that (for me anyway), however it still doesn't answer who planned this but that's another topic. But most likely Bin Laden, being in construction, knew of this demolition technique, and possibly hoped for the best by flying the planes in the buildings at that level. Very possible.
OK George, you could be off the hook on this one..lol
yes apparently the staff at the twin towers on 9/11 didn't notice the explosives strapped to all the beams on each floor......of course a plane fully loaded with jet fuel going so fast it nearly flew through the building {blew out the otherside} would not be enough to cause a collapse.
the building were glowing red!
people jumped due to the heat and smoke.
Neo: No. I don't believe it. It's not possible.Morpheus: I didn't say it would be easy, Neo. I just said it would be the truth.Neo: Stop. Let me out. Let me out. I want out. | |
yes apparently the staff at the twin towers on 9/11 didn't notice the explosives strapped to all the beams on each floor......of course a plane fully loaded with jet fuel going so fast it nearly flew through the building {blew out the otherside} would not be enough to cause a collapse.
the building were glowing red!
people jumped due to the heat and smoke.
Ah, those conspiracy nuts!! Absolutely crazy aren't they? Imagine that, accusing and questioning our honest politians of evil deeds and intent.
Even accusing our then beloved president, Mr Bush, of war crimes, our heroic president who sat there calmly after he was just told his country was under attack. He didn't want to scare the kids you say. Awwww, such a sweetheart, thinking of the kids in a moment like that.
And so we were under attack, but from what? And are they really a threat to national security? I mean, REALLY?
If the story is true, well then it was only a bunch of guys who managed to orchestrate an attack by hijacking a couple of planes. OK, so there's a bunch of cave dwellers in Afghanistan plotting the destruction of America. Is that really a threat? I mean, a national threat?
Ten years have gone by and these terrorists have hardly passed gas. Wow, now that's what I call war. Kill a couple of thousands of Americans every ten years, you'll really bring that country down.
So then, Mr Bush (and Cheney, and Rumsfeld, and Powell, and Condi) decide (cause they have access to credible information of course, that you, little joe can't see, because you can't read and wouldn't understand it anyway. Only them are smart enough to read and decipher this stuff..ya right!!)
That it's time to protect America. We're taking this war to the terrorists. They have WMDs, nukes, uranium, you name it they've got it, I mean stuff that will melt your eyeballs. They're plotting our demise and if we don't do anything NOW, they'll annihilate us!!!!
So Bush Inc. decides it's OK to randomly attack a country (OK Dick, pick a card, any card), killing hundreds of thousands of women and children (he didn't care that time did he?), Shock and Awe, just so they could get rid of the man who owned and controlled that country's oil and give that control to his buddy's corp. Nice.
And guess what? The weapons? There wasn't any. hahaha. Oops! We lied. But, don't you dare accuse us!!! It's politically incorrect to ask the right questions, and expect the right answers. If you persist with your questions, we'll throw you in jail, ruin you financially, call you anti-American, unpatriotic and a traiter, and maybe kill ya. That'll teach you not to shut up.
What I believe though, is that a few, like Bush, had prior knowledge of the attacks, and it wouldn't surprise me to find out they were part of it somehow. Besides, what convinced me that Bush knew, was his facial expression in the classroom when he found out that the sh.t was going down. He just couldn't hide his inner struggle. He's not a good liar.
And you call me a nut to question these people. C'mon.
Go back to sleep and uncle Bush will come in shortly to tuck you in with your favorite teddy bear and read you a bedtime story of lies. Oh wait, uncle Bush is busy right now, so uncle Obama will do it instead.
You deniers are really funny, and gullible.
forgive me if this comes off as harsh,.
i've read & read many posts here mostly very negative.
alot of you have family that have shunned & continue to shun.
You mean like a publishing and real estate business. Bonus: getting your clients to finance the operation without a return on investment. Great idea, why didn't I think of that. You're so smart.
i was reading an article about how men should not tuck in their shirts if the shirt is worn as casual wear.. i often wear suits with a black tee shirt, tucked in.
i have some great cabana style shirts that are always worn over the belt.
if i'm playing some sport, i would never tuck in a tee shirt.. i looked online after i read the article and it seems some are very firm on their position...... and while we're at it, should men wear a belt with jeans or with dress slacks?.
It looks better if it's tucked in but I rarely do. I find it feels more comfortable when it's not tucked in. Like someone said, if people don't like it they can look the other way.
assuming that everytime i connect to the internet i'm in a different location ex:starbucks, mcdonald's, coffee shop, etc.
i then get a different ip address everytime (right?).
ex: i go at starbucks, get an ip address, sign into google using [email protected] (send a few emails, post a few comments) then logout and go to the mcdonald's a few blocks down the street and connect.
J. Hofer, that's what I read anyway. I'll just find myself some linux os and do it that way.
assuming that everytime i connect to the internet i'm in a different location ex:starbucks, mcdonald's, coffee shop, etc.
i then get a different ip address everytime (right?).
ex: i go at starbucks, get an ip address, sign into google using [email protected] (send a few emails, post a few comments) then logout and go to the mcdonald's a few blocks down the street and connect.
Thanks Anony Mous. The last paragraph was quite hilarious. I wish. "and MAYBE they won't find you"..after all those efforts..lol
mummatron, nothing that illegal, especially not trying to hack the pentagon (i'm crazy but not that crazy).
assuming that everytime i connect to the internet i'm in a different location ex:starbucks, mcdonald's, coffee shop, etc.
i then get a different ip address everytime (right?).
ex: i go at starbucks, get an ip address, sign into google using [email protected] (send a few emails, post a few comments) then logout and go to the mcdonald's a few blocks down the street and connect.
@baltar: I suppose someone could delete cookies as they went before logging on to another network. I think maybe IP addresses can be tracked to a geographic location, so when you log on from across the country, google for example knows that you usually log from IPs in a certain area, so they warn you (or whoever is trying to hack your account..lol). So then, obviously they do keep track of IPs. Looking into the VPN. Thanks.
@thetrueone: Thanks for the link I'll play around with it. It seems free of use, I didn't see a price yet. Maybe at installation or when trying to initially use the service. Anyway I'll see.
@bohm I think continuously deleting cooking would sort of solve that. Kind of a pain in the behind though.
Thanks mummatron. I had read a while back about MAC addresses. I'll read up on that again but I think you can change them manually also (that too a pain}.
assuming that everytime i connect to the internet i'm in a different location ex:starbucks, mcdonald's, coffee shop, etc.
i then get a different ip address everytime (right?).
ex: i go at starbucks, get an ip address, sign into google using [email protected] (send a few emails, post a few comments) then logout and go to the mcdonald's a few blocks down the street and connect.
Assuming that everytime I connect to the internet I'm in a different location ex:Starbucks, McDonald's, coffee shop, etc. I then get a different IP address everytime (right?).
Ex: I go at Starbucks, get an IP address, sign into google using [email protected] (send a few emails, post a few comments) then logout and go to the Mcdonald's a few blocks down the street and connect. I get a different IP address, sign into google using [email protected] (send a few emails, post a few comments) then logout. As far as google is concerned two different people logged into their account at two different locations versus using the same location for both users (google would see that both users used the same IP then must/could be the same person). In the first scenario, the only thing common to both locations was my laptop.
So, is my laptop information also stored somewhere, how and by who? If yes, is it possible to block this?
