my opinion is that atheism is not a belief.
it is a belief in no belief..
Do you believe in Popokaotas ?
You don't know what does it mean "Popokaotas"? You are embarassed ?
It's the same for me when you ask "do you believe in God ? " . I don't know what does it mean "God". God of the sacred books, of Spinoza, of the 38 000 different christian confessions, God like Anthony Flew, God the name given by my wife when she's seeing my beautiful (censored).... ?
Conclusion : No good definition, no need to ask if it's a belief or not.
what's actually the difference between this .... .
... and this picture?.
why is this marcher evil .... .
And again the same claim : "Atheism = terror. See Pol Pot, Mao, Staline ! "
You can listen the hoaxes given here : http://www.jw.org/
Sam Harris & Richard Dawkins will burn in Hell !!!
i recently completed making this video:.
the origin of life.
it's a quick look at the watchtower's new brochure.
Hey guys ! I don't have any news from Sheperd Book. So, I'm asking the question for the geeks...
How did he do that ? PowerPoint file? Other program ?
Thanks for your help & the clues given !!
hi guys !.
would it be possible to have the new brochure was life created in pdf, please?
the link given on the forum is broken.. thanks.
up up up !!
link: http://www.mediafire.com/?fzjmfambyro0fof.
the essay linked above was written specifically to address the new creationist brochures that were put out by the watchtower at this year's district convention.
the goals of the essay are the following:.
A better translation (thanks to my wife)
Professeur Meinesz contacted by email 24/08/2010 5:31 pm (French Hour)
* Did you authorize the Watchtower to make reference to your book ? Of course, not !
* Do you support the creationist view of JW ? Absolutly not !
* Is this quote correct? They’re making reference to my book on page 32 to 60 but this is not what I wrote. The sentence they are mentioning appears on page 47 but taken out of its context. They made an amalgam starting on a discussion where I examined 2 possibilities of life rising up on earth : (cells coming from space or cells formating on earth) and I develop my opinion supported by numerous current datas (for me there is no evidence that it happened on earth so it's the other hypothesis (life began elsewhere) which should be considered as well as the other hypothesis. That's it !
On the contrary, I'm opposed to creationists but also to the ID movement (several paragraps on the subject). I am very clear in my book and a chapter underlines the contingency factor in all the process of evolution (with pictures to support on page 186 !).
They’re promoting my book in their publications but if Jehovah's followers will read it, they will be very very disappointed !
Please be aware that my book is a very serious work very well documented (nearly 1000 references) and it passed through the filter of 8 referees before being edited in USA (University of Chicago Press !)
So you are authorized to publish my words!
What would you advise me to do to counterfact those lies? I'm ready to sue them ! Therefore I would need their brochures and documents in order to prove through the huge publication of their craps, the damage caused to my reputation
A. Meinesz
-- Professeur Alexandre MEINESZ
Laboratoire « ECOMERS» (EA 4228), Faculté des Sciences,
Université Nice Sophia Antipolis
Parc Valrose
06108 NICE Cedex 2, France
http://www.alexandre-meinesz.com
http://www.unice.fr/ecomers/
http://www.caulerpa.org
hi guys !.
would it be possible to have the new brochure was life created in pdf, please?
the link given on the forum is broken.. thanks.
UP !!
hi guys !.
would it be possible to have the new brochure was life created in pdf, please?
the link given on the forum is broken.. thanks.
Hi guys !
Would it be possible to have the new brochure Was Life Created in PDF, please? The link given on the forum is broken.
Thanks
i am trying to review the "origin of life" booklet, and i got to say that the more i look into it the worse it look.
this particular quote puzzled me a lot (p. 28).
one group of researchers used brain size to speculate which extinct creatures were more closely related to man admitted that in doing so, they often feel on shaky ground.. they took the quote from the preface of the "the human fossil record - volume 3" from 2004. .
hum....found by Wobble, put in a table sheet by me
So I am opened to find other blatant misquotes. Share guys !!!
link: http://www.mediafire.com/?fzjmfambyro0fof.
the essay linked above was written specifically to address the new creationist brochures that were put out by the watchtower at this year's district convention.
the goals of the essay are the following:.
Please find in this link the job done by Wobble (and 3rdeyeopen) gathered in a table sheet
Thanks for comments & proof readers !!
i am trying to review the "origin of life" booklet, and i got to say that the more i look into it the worse it look.
this particular quote puzzled me a lot (p. 28).
one group of researchers used brain size to speculate which extinct creatures were more closely related to man admitted that in doing so, they often feel on shaky ground.. they took the quote from the preface of the "the human fossil record - volume 3" from 2004. .
Please find in this link the job done by Wobble gathered in a table sheet
Thanks for comment & proof readers !!
