Faith isn't all "Paul Broun"s (see "Evolution" at the link below) and JWs
leaders failing to find scientific agreement in making conservative arguments.
Others more liberal in their faith may criticize their efforts.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Broun#Controversies
You might as well label music a failure for it not finding scientific agreement
for favorite songs (compared to better agreement for the objective math of the
music). There's understanding faith as such: "Some Christians view denomination-
alism as a regrettable fact. As of 2011, divisions are becoming less sharp, and
there is increasing cooperation between denominations (See denomination for a dis-
tinction between denomination and association in religious governance)."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denominationalism
Not knowing proof God is or isn't, the perpective I'd recommend is seeing faith
in the basic God concept as a choice to hope or not in a possible God beyond the
known things, and to have science keep us up on those known things. After all, if
this God is there, it wouldn't honor Him to misinform in His name. And knowing
it's a possibility, not a proven, to not see harm as justified by it.
http://glenster1.webs.com/basics.htm
You may fare better seeking agreement on scientific results and not wanting harm
over faith from believers and non- believers than expecting all to be one or the
other. Expecting science to prove one may be as much folly as expecting it to
prove the other.
