Posts by writetoknow

67

Advocating Destruction of Religion Hate Speech?

by writetoknow in

introduction.

in 1942, the supreme court sustained the conviction of a jehovah's witness who addressed a police officer as a "god dammed racketeer" and "a damned facist" (chaplinksy v. new hampshire).

the court's opinion in the case stated that there was a category of face-to-face epithets, or "fighting words," that was wholly outside of the protection of the first amendment: those words "which by their very utterance inflict injury" and which "are no essential part of any exposition of ideas.".

writetoknow

For one it not the a million times so stop overreacting. If disrespect is so great why are you upset? Now if people don't want their beliefs respected then why all the killings in the name of respect?

So how about treating others as you wish to be treated and perhaps these super complex subjects would just vanish. Now when you advocate something higher then what has been happeing on this earh since the start of the history of man we will move forward.

Once again the subject is about "Hate Speech" how a group or person can advocate destruction of religion and it not be the same old hate speech? The same as regilion and other groups have uses to destroy nations, people and groups?

67

Advocating Destruction of Religion Hate Speech?

by writetoknow in

introduction.

in 1942, the supreme court sustained the conviction of a jehovah's witness who addressed a police officer as a "god dammed racketeer" and "a damned facist" (chaplinksy v. new hampshire).

the court's opinion in the case stated that there was a category of face-to-face epithets, or "fighting words," that was wholly outside of the protection of the first amendment: those words "which by their very utterance inflict injury" and which "are no essential part of any exposition of ideas.".

writetoknow

I don't understand your line of reasonings? I have noted on this forum relgious people are equated to Nazis! Why I don't understand if that were true we all be living in concentration camps not holding open discussion about hate speech on a forum.

Moreover, I am against labeling that is sterotyping in order demean a group or person without knowing the person. We all want other to respect our beliefs rather they agree or not with them that is part of being a human that brings people up not down.

59

NON-THEISTIC belief systems REQUIRE LOTS of FAITH (e.g. people from FISH)

by hooberus in

i once saw dawkins refer to his views as a "belief system".

indeed, persons who subscribe to a non-theistic belief system* have been generally forced to hold to the following beliefs:.

that life came from non-life.. that people came from fish (fish are in mans actual ancestry in evolutionary phylogenetic trees).

writetoknow

You tell me which group you claim the right to say they are not answered? That does not seem very factual in fact that sound subjective open to personal beliefs. I am right your wrong my ways a better then yours does not sound like anything new.

67

Advocating Destruction of Religion Hate Speech?

by writetoknow in

introduction.

in 1942, the supreme court sustained the conviction of a jehovah's witness who addressed a police officer as a "god dammed racketeer" and "a damned facist" (chaplinksy v. new hampshire).

the court's opinion in the case stated that there was a category of face-to-face epithets, or "fighting words," that was wholly outside of the protection of the first amendment: those words "which by their very utterance inflict injury" and which "are no essential part of any exposition of ideas.".

writetoknow

Who is a Nazi? What does Nazi mean to you? Can you prove that I am a Nazi and if not then perhaps you should understanding slandering a person you know nothing about otherwise you are doing what you hate about religion during the darkages.

67

Advocating Destruction of Religion Hate Speech?

by writetoknow in

introduction.

in 1942, the supreme court sustained the conviction of a jehovah's witness who addressed a police officer as a "god dammed racketeer" and "a damned facist" (chaplinksy v. new hampshire).

the court's opinion in the case stated that there was a category of face-to-face epithets, or "fighting words," that was wholly outside of the protection of the first amendment: those words "which by their very utterance inflict injury" and which "are no essential part of any exposition of ideas.".

writetoknow

The topic is about hate speech - what it is and advocating the destruction of religion is it hate speech? Did I state that I thought religion is right or did you assume to label me?

The people advocating because I was a slave the only way to right the wrong is to make those that made us slaves slaves is the same thing the only thing that changed in the power?

So your staying that who ever has the power should control the beliefs of others and hopeful those in power have your beliefs?

67

Advocating Destruction of Religion Hate Speech?

by writetoknow in

introduction.

in 1942, the supreme court sustained the conviction of a jehovah's witness who addressed a police officer as a "god dammed racketeer" and "a damned facist" (chaplinksy v. new hampshire).

the court's opinion in the case stated that there was a category of face-to-face epithets, or "fighting words," that was wholly outside of the protection of the first amendment: those words "which by their very utterance inflict injury" and which "are no essential part of any exposition of ideas.".

writetoknow

So your beliefs are better? Thus, you take the right to condemn and destory religion because your ideology is better? This sound like the same old same old darkages manipulation. Would your ideology, require labling "all" the religous people as disease?

59

NON-THEISTIC belief systems REQUIRE LOTS of FAITH (e.g. people from FISH)

by hooberus in

i once saw dawkins refer to his views as a "belief system".

indeed, persons who subscribe to a non-theistic belief system* have been generally forced to hold to the following beliefs:.

that life came from non-life.. that people came from fish (fish are in mans actual ancestry in evolutionary phylogenetic trees).

writetoknow

What of the prayers that are answered do you assume that person is lying? So you claim to be the ultimate authority to judge if a person prayers are answered or not?

59

NON-THEISTIC belief systems REQUIRE LOTS of FAITH (e.g. people from FISH)

by hooberus in

i once saw dawkins refer to his views as a "belief system".

indeed, persons who subscribe to a non-theistic belief system* have been generally forced to hold to the following beliefs:.

that life came from non-life.. that people came from fish (fish are in mans actual ancestry in evolutionary phylogenetic trees).

writetoknow

How do you know that the authorities that define faith or your thoughts are correct, correct enough that the definition will never change, correct enough to remove another person beliefs? And who is to say they are correct?

67

Advocating Destruction of Religion Hate Speech?

by writetoknow in

introduction.

in 1942, the supreme court sustained the conviction of a jehovah's witness who addressed a police officer as a "god dammed racketeer" and "a damned facist" (chaplinksy v. new hampshire).

the court's opinion in the case stated that there was a category of face-to-face epithets, or "fighting words," that was wholly outside of the protection of the first amendment: those words "which by their very utterance inflict injury" and which "are no essential part of any exposition of ideas.".

writetoknow

So you are saying religion is a disease that has to be erraticated? What authority assumes the right to erracticate this disease and how do we know they are right?

59

NON-THEISTIC belief systems REQUIRE LOTS of FAITH (e.g. people from FISH)

by hooberus in

i once saw dawkins refer to his views as a "belief system".

indeed, persons who subscribe to a non-theistic belief system* have been generally forced to hold to the following beliefs:.

that life came from non-life.. that people came from fish (fish are in mans actual ancestry in evolutionary phylogenetic trees).

writetoknow

How do you define faith on whos authority?