Show me where I'm wrong clearly and I will repent with an admission.
Say I'm wrong with no proof does nothing.
You're not wrong, because you didn't day anything. That was my whole point.
I didn't think I needed to quote what you'd said just a few posts above, but apparently I do.
Why do you postulate only 2 choices? Arn't their any more?
Come up with some then. If there are more than two possible options, come up with a third one for Farkel to deal with.
I never heard this type of reasoning did you make that up?
You've never heard of circular reasoning? Do you ever read posts on this board? Most of the major logical fallacies come up repeatedly. How is anyone supposed to respond to an ill-considered, vapid comment like that?
And then to the crux of Farkel's argument (in a nutshell that if God is the source of morality, then the most absurd thing becomes moral if and only if God orders it) you responded:
Oh come on now, lets be just a little bit real.
Amazingly, you seemed to think you had refuted or dealt with Farkel's argument. All you've done in this thread is ask questions and ignore the answers. if you've got a point of view, share it. if you agree with Farkel, say so. If you think he's wrong, say why. But for God's sake, say
something.
--
"The world is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion." - Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason, 1794.