guess the overlapping generation concept is difficult for most to comprehend.
david spane does his best to explain it again.
the cutoff date for this generation has now moved to 1992 (was once 1935), the year that fred franz died.
Blues Brother, anyone claiming to be anointed prior to 1992 (in their example) would be part of the second group. It would include many born even after 1960 if they had "the calling" in their twenties.
They've extended their timeline by decades now.
Quite the loose use of the word "generation"
guess the overlapping generation concept is difficult for most to comprehend.
david spane does his best to explain it again.
the cutoff date for this generation has now moved to 1992 (was once 1935), the year that fred franz died.
So 1992 is Fred W Franz' death.... What exactly is the significance of that?They're using him as an example. "Assuming" he was the last one living that was anointed before 1914, his contemporaries of the generation would have to be someone anointed prior to his death in 1992.
guess the overlapping generation concept is difficult for most to comprehend.
david spane does his best to explain it again.
the cutoff date for this generation has now moved to 1992 (was once 1935), the year that fred franz died.
guess the overlapping generation concept is difficult for most to comprehend.
david spane does his best to explain it again.
the cutoff date for this generation has now moved to 1992 (was once 1935), the year that fred franz died.
When Franz died.Where the hell have they got 1992 from?
It's what the FWF in the chart stands for: Frederick William Franz
It should really be WTF
guess the overlapping generation concept is difficult for most to comprehend.
david spane does his best to explain it again.
the cutoff date for this generation has now moved to 1992 (was once 1935), the year that fred franz died.
This will be the chart on JW broadcasting in 50 years.
They'll just keep extending the overlapping generation as much as they need to and eventually include the Group 3 of the anointed.
from the november 2015 watchtower:.
what have archaeologists found that shows that jericho was captured in a short time?.
joshua 6:10-15, 20 says that the israelite soldiers marched around the city of jericho once a day for six days.
Actual quote: "In her limited excavation area, Kenyon recovered six bushels of grain in one season!"who excavated Jericho in the 1950s. She is said to have discovered "six bushels" of grain over the entire dig site
Actual quote: "Additional tests were done on six grain samples from the destruction level resulting in dates between 1640 and 1520 B.C."scattered grain, dating from a thousand years too early
120-240 years is hardly "1000 years"
I'm by no means a JW apologist, but just because they mine quote and take things out of context doesn't give anyone else a free pass to do the same. We don't need to exaggerate the evidence to show how deceptive the WT is.
25 clips of australia royal investigation into jehovah's witnesses.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=plpzivm4mytedlqh8vvbwcllzsqaii12jd.
.
as the shepherd the flock book is now in the public domain, if the .org decides to create a new manual, how soon will it be leaked?.
this is mostly a question for wifibandit, but anyone else who may know is welcome to answer.
would it be a matter of days before we get a .pdf?
I'm sure it will be in "apostate" hands & read before the vast majority of elders even knew a new manual was released.
The new CO video is a prime example. WifiBandit & Pixel provide us all with spiritual food at the proper time, and by that I mean before every other JW.
http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/aug/03/jehovahs-witnesses-let-repentant-child-sex-abusers-return-to-church.
excuse the typo in subject heading.
i'm watching the royal commission hearings and trying to post this link to the guardian at the same time.
I would have the word "repentent" in, well... quotes.
The very first sentence of the article does have it in quotes actually
The Jehovah’s Witnesses church let “repentant” child sex abusers return to the congregation, who were then kept in the dark about their crimes, an alleged abuse victim has claimed.
https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.
anyone know who this monty baker is?
i'm sure this guy will be able to tell the rc how things work behind the scenes without all the evasiveness, being that he is an "apostate".
Did she just torpedo the JW? I think she just said a standard of practice she would recommend is never to allow a former child abuser to be in a ministry position. Maybe she doesn't know that JW's appoint child abusers again as MS or elders.
