Bohm wrote, "EAS: I dont want to bury you and I, to, would really like to know your view on leavingwt's question, since in this whole flood debate it can sometimes be hard to actually find out what both sides theories are. But i do have something else that is more personal in nature and i really think is the first question that need to be asked: if we ASSUME that the bible said nothing about ark, and it said nothing about evolution/creation. ie. we take away ALL the biblical evidence and consider ONLY the secular. would you then believe the ark to be true? evolution?"
First, thanks for not wanting to bury me :)
There are no "official" creationist views on much of anything, since, unlike the Watchtower Society, creationists are largely independent in theology, science, and study, that is, there is no oversight board to keep us standardized. Many creationists will tell you that all species share similarities because they share a common planet. God said He made the planet to be inhabited. The differences are God's design. The design is programmed for flexibiliity and not stagnation. The DNA code has built into a vast amount of pre-programmed variations and pre-planned adaptations. For example, take a sighted fish school and trap it in an underground stream and without light it adapts to its environment, effectively becoming blind because there is no longer light to interact with. Modern scientists will call that a form of micro-evolution. Creationists see it as flexible DNA coding to allow for adapting to the ever-changing environment.
You asked that if the Bible did not speak of creation, the ark, or the flood, would I believe in them or in the dominant secular view? How could I believe in something I did not know about? For example, a couple of men who were ex-patriots from Jerusalem had only ever heard John the Baptist preach but had never heard of Jesus. They were later asked whether they had been sealed with the Holy Spirit. They replied, "We did not even know there was a Holy Spirit." They wanted to believe in the Holy Spirit and in Jesus, but they had not yet been taught.
Bohm also wrote, "By the way - thanks for being here! It is allways interesting to have a JW point of view to stir things up once in a while." Sorry to disappoint. I am a born again Christian, not a JW. I am on this forum because I had been meeting regularly with JWs in Bible studies for well more than a year. I wanted to know more about what they and ex-JWs thought and believed. Again, sorry to disappoint.