the case for god:.
the "big bang" argument for god:.
the argument for god from evil:.
"um, tectonic activity existed long before the supposed global flood ~4000 years ago. Or even man's "creation" ~6000 years ago. Same with other natural disasters, like asteroid impacts."
Please don't tell me you're basing this off of the flawed dating methods?
the case for god:.
the "big bang" argument for god:.
the argument for god from evil:.
"That's what any skeptic would do. You wouldn't question such an action at all? You would immediately conclude that it must be the Judeo-Christian God? Personally I would question it and want to explore all possibilities."
Sure I agree with you...question away but some spend their entire life with mere questions while not truly looking for any of the answers. It's a life's work of being on "the debate team". Explore all of the possibilites then what? Many IMO (not saying all) that don't believe in God would just rather put off somthing out side of them and their sphere of influence since it really doesn't affect them or their choicesanyways...what if it does?
the case for god:.
the "big bang" argument for god:.
the argument for god from evil:.
"Sure we do. Earthquakes are a result of tectonic activity. No way man can affect that. Tsunamis can be a result of earthquakes. No way man can affect that. Tornados and hurricanes are not caused by man. Large meteroid or asteroid striking the surface of the Earth are not caused by man."
"Cancer and disease are age old. They attack children. Humans did not do that."
I believe FlyingHighNow might be saying that all of this is a result from the fall/sins of man...eg tectonic activitystemming from deluge of the flood, the fountains of the deep erupting, and entropy/disease coming from the fall in the garden etc. Just a thought I'm sure you'll reject.
the case for god:.
the "big bang" argument for god:.
the argument for god from evil:.
"This is not strictly correct, everything did not begin at the big bang, the theory is that there was already a point mass that exploded at the big bang."
Why can't that point mass be God, maybe just a little bigger? lol. It's really faith no matter which side you're on. I'm assuming that point mass is eternal, and what exactly is it...man seen has it with his eyes, no?
"Why doesn't god just come out and proclaim his existence? Why do we need a case for it"?
What about if he already has and you're looking at the data from the wrong angle? I'm not saying you in paticular, but there are those, even if a divine being came down in "chariots of fire", they would say "how do we know this is not just a "Copperfield" magic trick..."? Or"how do we know this is God but just another creature from another world or how do we prove he created everything?"
As the saying goes "an atheist can't find God for the same reason a criminal can't find a cop". I was not inclined to find God-since I spent so much time refuting him-for 18 years and guess what...I didn't.
.
this is the one i need but the full page please...thank-you.... .
Thank-you so much Atlantis...you always come through!!!
i hope you don't think i'm blowing my own horn by posting this information about my latest blog.
i spent a lot of time researching this subject and i think some of you folks might like to have this material in your files for future use.
it was a tedious project, but i learned a lot.
book marked...
actually, this is part 8 or 9, i can't remember, but i thought i would number them from now on.. i am an active witness, and i want to help my friends and family.
i have had some success in trying to get them to reason, because i always state at the outset, and at the end of the conversation, that i support the faithful slave and gb no matter what.. so since i have a big vehicle, some of the older ones asked me to take them to special assembly day this past weekend.
i had already been, and i told you all about it, but i agreed.
Good stuff bro...did you get my PM?
sorry just can't get over this stuff...too much fun!
from the wbts website :.
http://www.watchtower.org/e/19970601/article_01.htm".
Sorry just can't get over this stuff...too much fun! From the WBTS website :
http://www.watchtower.org/e/19970601/article_01.htm"
"When Secrecy Signals Danger
Not all secret groups are secret to the same degree. But those that have "secrets within secrets," as the Encyclopædia Britannica expresses it, pose a particular danger. It explains that "by the use of special names, ordeals or revelations," members of the top ranks manage to "set themselves apart," thereby stimulating "the lower ranks to the effort necessary to reach the exalted degrees." The danger inherent in such groups is obvious. Those in the lower echelons may be completely unaware of the real objectives of the organization, not having as yet progressed to that level of revelation. It is easy to become involved in a group whose goals and methods of achieving them are only partially recognized and, indeed, perhaps not even fully shared. But the person who has been initiated into such a group may later find it difficult to free himself; he is, as it were, bound by chains of secrecy."
Yes ladies and gentlemen...another doosy...Ok I'm done for now
...at the next assembly.
i've heard from various sorces that the gb are planning on making it off limits, like they have already done for myspace.
has anyone else heard this?
AG it was great talking to you the other day on the call!
.
this is the one i need but the full page please...thank-you.... .
This is the one I need but the full page please...thank-you...
