The more the leaders of a group focus on sex among their membership the more it means they themselves are doing sexually questionable activities.
Like? Many readers know about Ewart (Ed) Chitty and Leon Greenlees who sat on the Governing Body.
Many also know about Theodore Jaracz of the Governing Body.
Why does the Watchtower Society beat up in particular on young boys and girls who masturbate when there are homosexuality and pedophilia skeletons in their own closets there in Brooklyn. Just make a guess.
If Jehovah hasn't, as they put out, brought Armageddon for a new world order because of the organization not being clean enough, then it needs cleansed at the top, starting with Ted Jaracz.
Also look at this from the Star Phoenix of Canada:
Sentence coming Friday for Jehovah's elder who had sex with teen
By Betty Ann Adam, TheStarPhoenix.com
Published: Tuesday, November 06, 2007
A 14-year-old girl was on a weekend pass from a psychiatric ward the first time Wendell Willick had sexual intercourse with her, a Queen's Bench judge heard Tuesday.
Willick, 47, a former elder of the Jehovah's Witnesses Lakeview Church, pleaded guilty in September to a charge of sexual exploitation for touching the teenager with his hands and penis over a three-year period between January 1996 and November 1999.
He was originally also charged with sexual assault, but was discharged on that count after a preliminary hearing in which the judge heard evidence the sexual relationship was consensual, said defence lawyer Daryl Labach.
Justice Marty Popescul will hand down a sentence on the sexual exploitation charge on Friday.The girl's family had moved to Saskatoon a year before the incidents began, and had met Willick and his family through the Jehovah's Witness congregation. The two families became good friends.
The girl was in the midst of a troubled adolescence, having once run away from home for three days, and she had repeatedly cut herself, said Crown prosecutor Sandeep Bains.
Willick sometimes tutored the girl in school work and was counselling her at the behest of her mother and stepfather. The girl often baby-sat Willick's children and had gone on a summer vacation with them, Bains said.
The girl's parents and Willick were the only visitors she was allowed to have during the seven weeks in early 1996 that she spent in the Hantelman Centre, which is the psychiatric ward of Royal University Hospital. The girl was sometimes sedated while there and was under psychiatric and medical care, Bains said.
The parents were out of town when the girl was given a weekend pass to visit the Willick home. The Willick children were asleep while the victim watched a movie with Willick and his wife.
After his wife went to bed, Willick gave the girl a beer. He then kissed, fondled and undressed her and had intercourse with her, Bains said.
The victim, now 25, recalled during the preliminary hearing the advance began without warning and she didn't know what was going on, Bains said.
Afterward, Willick expressed remorse for the sake of his family. When the girl returned to the hospital, she didn't tell anyone there, or her parents, what had occurred, partly out of concern for Willick's family, Bains said.
Bains outlined nine more occasions of intercourse over the next four years. Labach said there were additional incidents of kissing, fondling and oral sex.
By the time the girl was 17, she was employed by Willick's computer software company, Point 2 Technologies, but worked out of her home, Labach said. She sometimes called him at work and when he had spare time, sexual activity took place, Labach said.
Labach said the fact that there was never any violence and that the girl was a willing participant in the sexual activity were mitigating factors. Willick has no other criminal record.
The sexual contact ceased in 1999 when the girl was 17.
The girl's trust and spiritual beliefs were shattered, she said in a victim impact statement read into the court record.
"It made me feel like a person of no value with no voice. . . . Parts of myself are missing," she wrote.
The girl's mother was devastated by Willick's betrayal of trust, she wrote in her own victim impact statement. The exploitation of her daughter broke her heart and left her feeling powerless to help her daughter, she wrote.
Bains suggested the fact Willick had established a friendly relationship with the girl in the year before the sexual contact began could be seen as grooming. That he was in a position of power and authority over the girl is an aggravating factor, as was the girl's age, Bains said.
The maximum penalty for sexual exploitation is 10 years, but it was five years at the time of the offences, so the former maximum applies, Bains said.
The Crown seeks a term of three to four years.
Labach agreed the conviction requires a penitentiary sentence, but he asked that it be two years.
Willick told the court he accepts responsibility for the relationship getting out of hand and acknowledged he must face the consequences of his actions. He apologized to the girl's parents.