Good thread.I think there a number reasons they would come here.Before going further though, I think it's important to point out that there's a difference between someone who's trying to break free from the WT but still holds onto some JW ideologies (that kind of thing is normal as it takes time to clear ones mind) and the apologist who has a personal agenda of defending the WT .But you guys already new that, just wanted to mention it though..In the past, I've gone toe-to-toe with Thirdwitness on a number of occasions, a true company man (or men rather, as I believe there are several who use that singular handle of "Thirdwitness") Anyway, onto some of the reasons...
1. They view themselves as a "Theocratic Warrior" and expect that God will reward them for fighting for Him.
2.They thrive on DRAMA, CONFLICT and PERSONAL ATTENTION.They know that if they come here and make excuses for the Society's actions that they WILL get attention.Pathetic and immature, but true.
3.Some just like to be argumentative
4.Believe they will be able to turn "lurkers", or those sitting on the fence about leaving, back to being a JW again.This leads into...
5.Want to play the role of the innocent "conflicted one" while in reality inviting "persecution".This is hoped to provide evidence that those who leave the Org are dangerous and evil.The more lost, nasty and evil they can get someone to appear, the more they feel they've made the point.JW=Good. Apostate=Bad.This also ties into the next one...
6.Martyr Syndrome."Oh that poor apologist, look at the beating they're taking, that poor thing ! " "I can't believe how sweet that apologist is and look how they're get treated for sharing their innocent view." Etc.,etc.Pity triggers emotions and skews logic."If that's how those apostates behave, I want nothing to do with them.The Watchtower was right ! "
Yes, it's obvious the intention of many of the apologists is not to provide a "balanced" viewpoint but rather to make as many here look as bad as possible so they can show everyone just how wicked we are.They often have their response planned out in advance, kind of like the Reasoning Book."The apostate says this, I say that.I look innocent, they look bad." Of course, they always throw in the old standard: "Hey, look at my comments, I don't agree with everything they say , I'm just trying to sort things out for myself ! " Yeah sure...
Just an additional note.There are many opposing viewpoints here about many different issues, that certainly is not bad in itself.Being one-sided does little to sharpen the intellect and a contrary opinion at least allows one to contemplate viewpoints they may not have previously considered.However, when one defends the reprehensible, or just plain stupid, for no other reasons than the above cited ones, they make themselves equally as reprehensible and empty defensive arguments are usually pretty easy to spot.Sometimes it's actually kind of comical.You can see where someone will make a statement and you say to yourself: "Just about now an apologist will be showing up to use that old standard catch phrase.......wait for it......."But they're IMPERFECT ! " and the next thing you know , it happens.It's like a caricature really and all the while they think that no one notices.