Hadriel said: Lots of people conveniently want to exclude the initial catalyst.
What? We DO NOT KNOW what the "initial catalyst" was. You can speculate about this all you want but ultimately it comes down to pure speculation.
In order for that theory of yours to be taken seriously, it needs to be testable and repeatable. Perhaps someday but not today.
Hadriel said: You are unwilling to admit that intelligence could have kicked off the whole thing.
I can't speak for everyone else but even respected scientists like Richard Dawkins leave a small opening to the possibility that maybe an intelligence did kick the whole thing off.
The reason they don't waste time on that "possibility" is because in order to take it seriously you'd have to concede that a supernatural dimension exists. What evidence do we have that a supernatural dimension exists? NONE. Therefore why waste time giving this theory so much weight?
Science sticks to what it can test and measure. So at least for now, serious science sticks to the natural world, the only world that we know exists for sure.