Your dismissing comments towards compromise is the exact reason why this will never be anything more then an untaught chapter in public school science textbooks around the US for several decades to come.
How can there be a compromise? ID is not science. You want to teach unscientific religious views in a science class. If you succeeded, than what would stop astrologers from demanding their compromise, and devoting equal time to astrology when astronomy is being studied? What would stop numerologists from demanding their equal time in math class?
The fact that you seem to be missing is that their is a massive amount of data confirming the theory of evolution. There is no data confirming ID. Creationists are not being targeted for exclusion. They are being treated the same way as everyone else that has a hypothesis that turns out not to be supportd by objective evidence.