hawkaw

Joined

• started 169 topics
• posted 3,451 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by hawkaw

• 
  42

  Hey Women! Faithful Slave Sez You're Dumb!

  by metatron in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  oh, this is gonna be fun!.

  the august 22, 1967 awake has an article entitled.

  "i do not permit a woman to exercise authority.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hawkaw

  Well, Kiss My Tiara,

  This man fell out of this chair when he read it.

  BUT!! it wasn't because the WTS would dare write something like this. Like they have only needlessly killed a whole pile of little children and proudly displayed 26 of them on the cover of one of their 1994 Awake! rags. Like come on, any thing goes with this group of "perverts" unless the press or a government goes after them.

  I fell off my "rolly chair" because Metatron found the actual quote and article - unreal.

  I still have not heard on this thread if the article is still the present day "light" (cough, cough) OR if the idiots have actually "toned" down what they said in another later rag edition.

  hawk (who is looking forward to Monday when he gets to read the whole stupid article and will then owe metatron anything he wants)
• 
  29

  To Active COs/DOs

  by Maximus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  a major news organization is in final process of preparing a tv program addressing the issues raised by silentlambs.

  its producers and investigator reporters wish to be fair and unbiased, and are seeking broad input and insight.. another such organization has been attracted to the child abuse issue but does not wish to duplicate what's covered.

  they are in the initial stages of examining the blood issue and that of enforced shunning and its consequences, in the light of human rights issues globally.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hawkaw

  bttt

  hawk
• 
  58

  What's wrong w/JW's?

  by GodRules in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i would sincerely like to know what is so wrong with jehovah's witnesses.

  i invite anyone to post here.

  please use facts not personal opinions.. i am not interested in dates, the blood issue, nor the disfellowshipping issue since i am conviced that these do not prove that they are wrong.. i am weighing in to see if you as an opposer of jehovah's witnesses have the facts or not.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hawkaw

  GR,

  I don't give a cat's butt if you want to have a closed mind and stay with a group who wants to sacrifice its children. But...

  You still didn't take back your direct lie on the blood issue and apologize to this board as I requested!!!!

  That says everything to me - sad.

  hawk
• 
  42

  Hey Women! Faithful Slave Sez You're Dumb!

  by metatron in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  oh, this is gonna be fun!.

  the august 22, 1967 awake has an article entitled.

  "i do not permit a woman to exercise authority.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hawkaw

  Metatron,

  I will be in touch on Monday, July 23, 2001 via Email. My weekend is busy and I got away from my computer where I can Email you. If Maximus reads this, he has my permission to give my name and Email to you but I think he is way too busy with some major stuff to do that - he devotes so much time to such a noble cause - saving little people.

  Thank you very kindly and I will be in touch shortly.

  hawk
• 
  42

  Hey Women! Faithful Slave Sez You're Dumb!

  by metatron in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  oh, this is gonna be fun!.

  the august 22, 1967 awake has an article entitled.

  "i do not permit a woman to exercise authority.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hawkaw

  Rats!!! Its not on computer eh!

  Metatron or anybody else. Is there any way I can get a scan of this article sent to me?

  hawk
• 
  42

  Hey Women! Faithful Slave Sez You're Dumb!

  by metatron in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  oh, this is gonna be fun!.

  the august 22, 1967 awake has an article entitled.

  "i do not permit a woman to exercise authority.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hawkaw

  BTTT again.

  I am hopeful that there is someone out there who has this article and will publish it in full from the CD ROM.

  hawk
• 
  29

  To Active COs/DOs

  by Maximus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  a major news organization is in final process of preparing a tv program addressing the issues raised by silentlambs.

  its producers and investigator reporters wish to be fair and unbiased, and are seeking broad input and insight.. another such organization has been attracted to the child abuse issue but does not wish to duplicate what's covered.

  they are in the initial stages of examining the blood issue and that of enforced shunning and its consequences, in the light of human rights issues globally.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hawkaw

  bttt for a guy who does a lot of good that a lot of people don't know about.

  hawk
• 
  14

  New Procedures for handling Abusers

  by JEMIMAH in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i have been asked to handle a 35 minute item at the .

  kingdom ministry school for elders to be held at the end of the year.

  interestingly it is called "new procedures for protecting the congregation from child abuse" it will be a manuscript talk based on the new elders textbook.. as soon as i receive the manuscript i will upload it on to jwd.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hawkaw

  GR

  At least he didn't lie about the blood issue the way you did on this board!

  hawk
• 
  58

  What's wrong w/JW's?

  by GodRules in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i would sincerely like to know what is so wrong with jehovah's witnesses.

  i invite anyone to post here.

  please use facts not personal opinions.. i am not interested in dates, the blood issue, nor the disfellowshipping issue since i am conviced that these do not prove that they are wrong.. i am weighing in to see if you as an opposer of jehovah's witnesses have the facts or not.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hawkaw

  GR,

  You still didn't take back your lie!!!!

  In your first statement you said:

  The blood issue is not inconsistent and misleading. No blood transfussions.

  Then you said after being pressed:
  

  I understand that the blood issue is complicated.

  Lets get down to the nitty gritty of death. For years the WTS tells the flock how they have been protected from AIDs and other diseases.

  So lets look at hemophilicas. They took a beating in the 1970s and 1980s because the Factor VII & IX solutions made from human blood contained those diseases.

  So where was the WTS on the issue in 1978 (verbally 1975) - Factors VIII & IX were approved to be used!!!! They also approve organ tansplants in the 1980s which also carried a risk of getting these diseases.

  So much for protecting the flock but they still like to tell the world different!!!

  Admit to this board you lied and apolgize.

  hawk
• 
  58

  What's wrong w/JW's?

  by GodRules in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i would sincerely like to know what is so wrong with jehovah's witnesses.

  i invite anyone to post here.

  please use facts not personal opinions.. i am not interested in dates, the blood issue, nor the disfellowshipping issue since i am conviced that these do not prove that they are wrong.. i am weighing in to see if you as an opposer of jehovah's witnesses have the facts or not.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hawkaw

  GR,

  You said:

  The blood issue is not inconsistent and misleading. No blood transfussions. That's simple. Jehovah's Witnesses have helped the medical comunity in general is seeking a safer way to operate. I am thankful to Jehovah for that. The Bible is clear on Jehovah's view of taking in blood. I respect that and I know that Jehovah is much,much wiser than us. He is protecting us.

  That is a direct lie and I request you to take it back.

  Just one example. In the WT June 15/00 QFR, the WT says, besides other things, witnesses are not allowed to take white blood cells in a transfusion.

  But!!!, witnesses can now have white blood cell transfusion in a technique called peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) autografting.

  Article Title: Clinical and ethical issues in the treatment of a Jehovah's Witness with acute myeloblastic leukemia.
  Article Source: Arch Intern Med 1997 Aug 11-25;157(15):1753-7
  Author(s): Kerridge I; Lowe M; Seldon M; Enno A; Deveridge S
  ( http://www.ajwrb.org/physicians/muramoto-murky.html

  In 1998 hemoglobin was not allowed and is considered blood and then by the June 15, 00 WT hemglobin is okay and is not considered blood!!!!

  Please, I'm pleading with you wake up and read ( http://www.ajwrb.org

  And please whatever you do please back up your posts with proper facts.

  hawk