Amicus,
If it can be shown that the banning of conventional bulbs in favor of CFL bulbs produces some good for the COMMUNITY, then NOT to mandate such a change would be the actions of an irresponsible government.That statement is true of course. What is just as true is that sometimes legislators pass laws that are more flawed than necessary.
Government, like the law, works on the reality of approximation, not perfection, but with all respect, this has nothing to do with the point.
The fact is that it is necessary for responsible Government to 'intrude' into peoples personal choices over numerous matters. That it might get some of its mandates wrong some of the time is a given, but this does not undermine the principle of the necessity of government intervention in any way. If CFL bulbs better serve the community, as they do, then it would be irresponsible for them not to mandate their use.
It seems to me that the US is terrified of anything that might even remotely be interpreted as 'socialism' with the same rationality that they might view witches in Salem.
HS