Narkissos.
I think that your comment is also fairly foolish.
"(im)possible-san"
You cannot write others' name exactly, either.
http://www.karaite-korner.org/yhwh_2.pdf.
a very interesting paper.
i've only begun to read it.. i just finished watching this lecture.. http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/52_gordon.html.
Narkissos.
I think that your comment is also fairly foolish.
"(im)possible-san"
You cannot write others' name exactly, either.
http://www.karaite-korner.org/yhwh_2.pdf.
a very interesting paper.
i've only begun to read it.. i just finished watching this lecture.. http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/52_gordon.html.
TheOldHippie.
I think that you are foolish.
Shall I say so to you any number of times?
And also you are an intruder - no, the VERY VERY BIGGESTintruder since the 1930s.
since the 1930s?
Did you become insane?
possible
http://godpresencewithin.web.fc2.com/
http://www.karaite-korner.org/yhwh_2.pdf.
a very interesting paper.
i've only begun to read it.. i just finished watching this lecture.. http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/52_gordon.html.
OK, TheOldHippie.
I think that you are also an impolite person.
No, probably you are the most impolite.
I feel that you are an intruder.
Good-bye.
http://www.karaite-korner.org/yhwh_2.pdf.
a very interesting paper.
i've only begun to read it.. i just finished watching this lecture.. http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/52_gordon.html.
Hi, yadda yadda 2.
I appreciate to you.
There is no website in English.
I'm sorry.
See you again, somewhere.
http://www.karaite-korner.org/yhwh_2.pdf.
a very interesting paper.
i've only begun to read it.. i just finished watching this lecture.. http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/52_gordon.html.
gubberningbody.
Although your advice is thankful, I may have to say to you.
The Bible does not apply to others.
I think that how to use your Bible may cause anger on the contrary.
When people are angry.
Although I rarely get angry, I think that I have to say to an impolite person.
That "you are an impolite person."
http://www.karaite-korner.org/yhwh_2.pdf.
a very interesting paper.
i've only begun to read it.. i just finished watching this lecture.. http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/52_gordon.html.
TheOldHippie.
Thank you for the kind advice.
But I think that your advice is irrelevant.
Since I cannot express well in English, I express in Japanese.
"jibun to iken wo koto ni suru dake de, tanin wo "burei" yobawari suru koto wa nai"
Various opinions are posted in my Japanese forum.
People are writing their own opinions freely, respectively.
http://bb2.atbb.jp/strongwings/
You should not see only the surface but you should understand well why I am angry.
Thank you for the advice.
http://www.karaite-korner.org/yhwh_2.pdf.
a very interesting paper.
i've only begun to read it.. i just finished watching this lecture.. http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/52_gordon.html.
Earnest,
It is not impolite to say it is a bold assertion that you make when you have no evidence for it.
Probably, I do not like that "arrogant attitude" of yours.
I feel that those words of yours are impolite.
Probably, you always do so, and I think that you have surely pressured other people so that your foolish view may be accepted.
If I was living at the time that the Karaite Jews were using the divine name I could tell you how they pronounced it. As I am not I cannot.
I think that you "escaped" well, without explaining at all.
There are a number of reasons that I believe the divine name is not contained in existing mss of the New Testament including the large gentile composition of the Christian Church after the death of the apostles and the identification of God's name with the Jews by the Roman authorities, but it is a different thing to argue that the tetragrammaton was not included in the New Testament for which there is evidence rather than that the early Christians did not pronounce it for which there is none.
I think that you are explaining nothing.
I asked you "what is the reason the divine name is not included in the New Testament manuscripts at all?."
You "escaped" again.
I feel that a shallow person like you cannot explain.
http://www.karaite-korner.org/yhwh_2.pdf.
a very interesting paper.
i've only begun to read it.. i just finished watching this lecture.. http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/52_gordon.html.
Black Sheep.
Thank you for your kind advice.
You are an impolite man like Earnest.
You teach people a lie about the Trinity.
http://www.karaite-korner.org/yhwh_2.pdf.
a very interesting paper.
i've only begun to read it.. i just finished watching this lecture.. http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/52_gordon.html.
Earnest.
What a bold assertion.
hahaha,
You, the impolite person of the name of "Earnest."
What is your business here?
Is it for teasing me?
Shall I am also hard on you?
As the Karaite Jews (in contrast to the Rabbinic Jews) continued to use God's name as late as the tenth century why do you think the Jewish Christians did not.
You are a person who says an interesting thing.
If so, what is the pronunciation of that divine name?
What is the "exact pronunciation" by Karaite Jews?
And, what is the reason the divine name is not included in the New Testament manuscripts at all?
Please explain to me logically.
Probably, I am hard on you, when you give strange explanation.
http://www.karaite-korner.org/yhwh_2.pdf.
a very interesting paper.
i've only begun to read it.. i just finished watching this lecture.. http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/52_gordon.html.
gubberningbody.
It was an interesting material.
"Yehvah" (Yehovah) is a pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton which is written in the Hebrew text.
But it is "Qere perpetuum" (perpetual Qere) in fact.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qere
That is, the pronunciation of that Tetragrammaton is "ADONAI."
Probably, Jesus also pronounced it such.
That exact pronunciation was lost.
The reason no Tetragrammaton was described in the New Testament is that Christian did not pronounce the divine name.