Do you say so, after reading those comments?
You yourself need to try hard.
i watched this video yesterday.. is this a fact?.
loose change 2nd edition (full).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yx9nrx37sm.
Do you say so, after reading those comments?
You yourself need to try hard.
i watched this video yesterday.. is this a fact?.
loose change 2nd edition (full).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yx9nrx37sm.
notverylikely.
After that, you said that you don't think Japanese people would accept the explanation I provided. I am asking why it is relevant that Japanese people would accept you. You brought up Japanese people so it would seem that you think what they think regarding the matter is relevant, so I am asking WHY you think it is relevant. Make sense?
Ah, I see.
Of course, I am not telling representing Japanese people.
Therefore, I said, "Probably","(I think)."
Well, you should read the comments of the following YouTube video.
Many Japanese people comment there.
Of course, since that is written in Japanese, you have to translate into English.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mBEXOhS3lU
And please search the words "Pentagon" and "body" (Kitai) in Japanese.
Each of those articles written in Japanese, will deny your explanation.
Of course, probably, there are also Japanese people who think that your explanation is correct.
possible
i watched this video yesterday.. is this a fact?.
loose change 2nd edition (full).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yx9nrx37sm.
notverylikely.
Although I am in this forum since 2008, I saw the question which I cannot understand for the first time.
Although I feel the intention that you make a fool of Japanese people.
i watched this video yesterday.. is this a fact?.
loose change 2nd edition (full).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yx9nrx37sm.
Once again, I have to say to you.
I cannot understand the meaning of your question.
Why do you ask me, "Why"?
i watched this video yesterday.. is this a fact?.
loose change 2nd edition (full).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yx9nrx37sm.
Probably your question is meaningless, IMO.
Your question is not as follows.
"What have Japanese people said about that?"
i watched this video yesterday.. is this a fact?.
loose change 2nd edition (full).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yx9nrx37sm.
I cannot understand the meaning (intention) of your question.
i watched this video yesterday.. is this a fact?.
loose change 2nd edition (full).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yx9nrx37sm.
notverylikely.
Thanks.
It didn't. It completely came apart, parts of it were burned, part vaporized.
Probably, many of Japanese people will not consent to that explanation. (I think)
Furthermore, do the people of Afghanistan and Iraq consent to that explanation?
In a sense, I think that that is similar to a "blind belief", IMO
It is because any evidence cannot be found there.
possible
i watched this video yesterday.. is this a fact?.
loose change 2nd edition (full).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yx9nrx37sm.
glenster.
Thanks.
But I think that there is no persuasiveness in your opinion, IMO.
It is meaningless that you criticize by your emotion/feeling.
Which part of that video is specifically incorrect?
Why isn't a voice recorder found?
And where did the body of the airplane which crashed into the Pentagon disappear?
possible
i watched this video yesterday.. is this a fact?.
loose change 2nd edition (full).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yx9nrx37sm.
glenster.
Thanks.
But, I said, "What do you think?"
"Your opinion" is not written in your post.
possible
i watched this video yesterday.. is this a fact?.
loose change 2nd edition (full).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yx9nrx37sm.
I watched this video yesterday.
Is this a fact?
What do you think?
Loose Change 2nd Edition (Full)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Yx9NRX37SM
Japanese version is here.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4377032998245988095&hl=en#
possible