Hi, Mebaqqer2.
You got the precious material.
Please use the "collection of Web links" in my website.
http://godpresencewithin.web.fc2.com/pages/link/link03.html
http://godpresencewithin.web.fc2.com/pages/link/link05.html
Hi, Mebaqqer2.
You got the precious material.
Please use the "collection of Web links" in my website.
http://godpresencewithin.web.fc2.com/pages/link/link03.html
http://godpresencewithin.web.fc2.com/pages/link/link05.html
Probably, it is the following phrase.
*** it-1 p. 1213 Interpretation ***
Matthew first wrote his Gospel account in Hebrew, according to the ancient testimony of Jerome, Eusebius Pamphili, Origen, Irenaeus, and Papias.
Who translated this Gospel later into Greek is not known.
If Matthew did so himself, as some think, then it is the only known inspired translation of Scripture.
i'm watching some youtube video's from newagegamer3018.
before in my research...i watched some of his video's when he was a jw apoligist.
now he has da'd himself and is defending the scriptures, not jw's.. this is the first time ever that i actually am starting to think/beleive that jesus and jehovah are the same thing.
Hi, leolaia.
posible-san....I used AFAIK to be polite. It is a very simple matter to do a search in the Pauline epistles for the verb eimi. I was just politely giving you the opportunity to provide me the passage, if one exists.
For me, all the words of the Scriptures are symbolic.
Probably, my view is not so simple as you think.
If we would like to only search "surface meaning of the words", isn't it enough that we just start "Bible software"?
Well, I did not feel that the word "AFAIK" is polite.
In the context which you used, it means "Paul is not giving such any explanation."
Although you probably have much knowledge, I feel some that you are arrogant.
http://www.watchtower.org/e/bible/1co/chapter_008.htm#bk1
http://www.watchtower.org/e/bible/1co/chapter_008.htm#bk2
Probably, I think that Jehovah's Witnesses do not like a such type.
i'm watching some youtube video's from newagegamer3018.
before in my research...i watched some of his video's when he was a jw apoligist.
now he has da'd himself and is defending the scriptures, not jw's.. this is the first time ever that i actually am starting to think/beleive that jesus and jehovah are the same thing.
Leolaia.
possible-san....My question wasn't if "I am" has a symbolic meaning, it was where in his letters "the Apostle Paul had mentioned Jesus as 'I am' ". Paul does not use this phrase AFAIK.
Probably I think that I have given the hint for understanding to you kindly.
And probably in the current context in this topic, the topic about a symbolic interpretation is not suitable.
I have my forum, and if you wish, I will teach there.
But it is if you hope to understand it truly.
Although I admire your knowledge, you say it "AFAIK" because your knowledge is limited.
this must have been mentioned before,but now reniaa is back it could be fun.. if jw's are even part way to the truth,and all other religions are false, then they must have a doctrine that is unique to them,given by holy spirit, but plainly taught in the bible,without resorting to fancifull exegesis and bouncing around from verse to verse out of context etc.. what is that doctrine?.
love.
wobble.. .
Hi, OUTLAW.
Since I do not speak English at all, I cannot make the website written in English.
The address which translates my website into English is as follows.
i'm watching some youtube video's from newagegamer3018.
before in my research...i watched some of his video's when he was a jw apoligist.
now he has da'd himself and is defending the scriptures, not jw's.. this is the first time ever that i actually am starting to think/beleive that jesus and jehovah are the same thing.
Leolaia.
Since I do not speak English at all, I sometimes cannot understand the meaning which you have said.
Please explain to me once again without using the word "Not."
Well, the word "I AM" is a symbolic meaning. (when I use)
For example, like the following video ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3M6cboaOKk
Therefore, the person who can only do reading the words (surface meaning of the words) cannot understand the symbolic meaning of the Scriptures.
Where does Paul refer to Jesus as "I am"?
It is "entirely", I think.
i'm watching some youtube video's from newagegamer3018.
before in my research...i watched some of his video's when he was a jw apoligist.
now he has da'd himself and is defending the scriptures, not jw's.. this is the first time ever that i actually am starting to think/beleive that jesus and jehovah are the same thing.
Hi, Leolaia.
Paul simply does not distinguish the Son from the Lord God of the OT.
I myself interpret the Scriptures always symbolically and figuratively.
And I think that the Apostle Paul was also such a person.
Therefore, the Apostle Paul had mentioned Jesus as "I AM."
And the Apostle Paul never used the word "Jehovah."
this must have been mentioned before,but now reniaa is back it could be fun.. if jw's are even part way to the truth,and all other religions are false, then they must have a doctrine that is unique to them,given by holy spirit, but plainly taught in the bible,without resorting to fancifull exegesis and bouncing around from verse to verse out of context etc.. what is that doctrine?.
love.
wobble.. .
Hi, reniaa.
Although I think that you who try to answer all people by only you are probably hard,
the people gathering in this forum are not so foolish as you think of.
Although I said also before, I think that you should be modesty (humble) more.
This characteristic is insufficient to you.
Although Mr. OUTLAW's words may look impolite for you, I think that he has said truth.
Sincerely
any takers?
i would love these for my research and the pdf i'm making.
btw, email me if you'd like this file when i'm done with it.
Thank you, Atlantis.
I downloaded it.
I always appreciate to you.
i'm watching some youtube video's from newagegamer3018.
before in my research...i watched some of his video's when he was a jw apoligist.
now he has da'd himself and is defending the scriptures, not jw's.. this is the first time ever that i actually am starting to think/beleive that jesus and jehovah are the same thing.
Since I do not speak English at all, I do not know in detail, but doesn't "john" (small letter, J) become a different meaning by slang?
(that is ..., toilet, bathroom; client of a prostitute)