i have not seen this discussed here before so i thought i would share it with the group.
romans 10:9 proves that jesus is jehovah.in the jw's kingdom interlinear translation of the greek scriptures they went to great effort to show that the tetragrammaton was supposed to be in the greek texts.
so, every time the name jehovah appears they show a footnote directing the reader to see how ky'ri*os applies always to jehovah in one or more of their j documents.
Chalam,
I feel that you are a really cunning person.
Probably, you do not understand the Trinity doctrine.
I said you that "I had not denied the Trinity."
From the viewpoint of that Trinity, "Jesus is the Alpha and the Omega" is natural.
I have not denied it.
possible
http://bb2.atbb.jp/possible/
i have not seen this discussed here before so i thought i would share it with the group.
romans 10:9 proves that jesus is jehovah.in the jw's kingdom interlinear translation of the greek scriptures they went to great effort to show that the tetragrammaton was supposed to be in the greek texts.
so, every time the name jehovah appears they show a footnote directing the reader to see how ky'ri*os applies always to jehovah in one or more of their j documents.
Chalam,
I said like this.
"You are a foul fellow."
You have replied nothing to my post.
And you shift a talk.
You will change topic and will only question me one after another, even if I answer to you sincerely.
You are a cunning person like the Watch Tower society.
possible
http://bb2.atbb.jp/possible/
i have not seen this discussed here before so i thought i would share it with the group.
romans 10:9 proves that jesus is jehovah.in the jw's kingdom interlinear translation of the greek scriptures they went to great effort to show that the tetragrammaton was supposed to be in the greek texts.
so, every time the name jehovah appears they show a footnote directing the reader to see how ky'ri*os applies always to jehovah in one or more of their j documents.
Chalam,
Since I do not speak English, please consent my strange English.
I feel that the way of your argument is foul.
PanzerZauberei described Romans 10:9.
Therefore, I made reference about it.You are trying to shift "point of argument" from there.
Although I do not know where you quote the Scriptures from, you should show a link.
In order that people can examine that context.
About Isaiah 45 (ASV), it has written as follows.
http://asvbible.com/isaiah/45.htm
Isaiah 45:20 has stated as follows. (The part which you have not quoted)
20 Assemble yourselves and come; draw near together, ye that are escaped of the nations: they have no knowledge that carry the wood of their graven image, and pray unto a god that cannot save.
We should take this context into consideration, when interpreting the verses 21-23.
And about Philippians 2:10 (ESV), why did you disregard the following verse?
It is written there as follows.
(Php 2:10) so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
(Php 2:11) and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
And about this Scripture (Php 2:11), it is as follows by another translation.
[11] And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of {Yahweh} the Father.
http://www.christolog.com/NT_Philippians.html
Well, in the argument which I am having now, I have not denied the Trinity.
possible
http://bb2.atbb.jp/possible/
i have not seen this discussed here before so i thought i would share it with the group.
romans 10:9 proves that jesus is jehovah.in the jw's kingdom interlinear translation of the greek scriptures they went to great effort to show that the tetragrammaton was supposed to be in the greek texts.
so, every time the name jehovah appears they show a footnote directing the reader to see how ky'ri*os applies always to jehovah in one or more of their j documents.
The time of now of Japan is a morning.
I'll answer later.
Well, I say to you once again.
"I think that such a way is foul."
It is better not to use a foul means.
You are a foul fellow.
i have not seen this discussed here before so i thought i would share it with the group.
romans 10:9 proves that jesus is jehovah.in the jw's kingdom interlinear translation of the greek scriptures they went to great effort to show that the tetragrammaton was supposed to be in the greek texts.
so, every time the name jehovah appears they show a footnote directing the reader to see how ky'ri*os applies always to jehovah in one or more of their j documents.
I say once again.
"I think that such a way is foul."
It is better not to use a foul means.
i have not seen this discussed here before so i thought i would share it with the group.
romans 10:9 proves that jesus is jehovah.in the jw's kingdom interlinear translation of the greek scriptures they went to great effort to show that the tetragrammaton was supposed to be in the greek texts.
so, every time the name jehovah appears they show a footnote directing the reader to see how ky'ri*os applies always to jehovah in one or more of their j documents.
It is better not to shift the talk.
Therefore, I said like this.
"Romans 10:9 itself does not prove that Jesus is Jehovah."
Chalam,
I think that such a way is foul.
possible
http://bb2.atbb.jp/possible/
i have not seen this discussed here before so i thought i would share it with the group.
romans 10:9 proves that jesus is jehovah.in the jw's kingdom interlinear translation of the greek scriptures they went to great effort to show that the tetragrammaton was supposed to be in the greek texts.
so, every time the name jehovah appears they show a footnote directing the reader to see how ky'ri*os applies always to jehovah in one or more of their j documents.
I was speaking from the standpoint of using the Watchtower's NWT and KIT Bibles.
Then, it is not more proved.
I think.
possible
http://bb2.atbb.jp/possible/
i have not seen this discussed here before so i thought i would share it with the group.
romans 10:9 proves that jesus is jehovah.in the jw's kingdom interlinear translation of the greek scriptures they went to great effort to show that the tetragrammaton was supposed to be in the greek texts.
so, every time the name jehovah appears they show a footnote directing the reader to see how ky'ri*os applies always to jehovah in one or more of their j documents.
Romans 10:9 itself does not prove that Jesus is Jehovah.
For example,
http://www.eliyah.com/Scripture/books/romans10.htm
http://www.sacrednamebible.com/B45C010.htm
Please refer to my website for other translations.
http://godpresencewithin.web.fc2.com/pages/link/link03.html
In addition, the view "Jesus is Jehovah" is not related to the Trinity doctrine.
possible
http://bb2.atbb.jp/possible/
does anyone have a link to that the website that has purely wt quotes on various subjects.
and how they have changed & flip flopped over the years?.
.
yesidid, Thank you.
There are few people who say appreciation like you.
I appreciate to you.
i apologize in advance if this has already been posted.
i jw friend of mine made referance to a study article a few weeks back that spoke on acceptable sexual practices of jw's.
what article was it and is there a link to a pdf?.
My forum is written in English.
http://bb2.atbb.jp/possible/
My Japanese forum.
http://bb2.atbb.jp/strongwings/
