passwordprotected,
Probably, I think that it is not the problem of only my unskilled English that you do not understand the correct Trinity.
First of all, for me, it seems that you do not have the attitude of understanding what others want to say.
good to see all the thread on jesus recently :).
10 "you are my witnesses," declares the lord, .
"and my servant whom i have chosen, .
passwordprotected,
Probably, I think that it is not the problem of only my unskilled English that you do not understand the correct Trinity.
First of all, for me, it seems that you do not have the attitude of understanding what others want to say.
good to see all the thread on jesus recently :).
10 "you are my witnesses," declares the lord, .
"and my servant whom i have chosen, .
passwordprotected,
You are frantic in refuting my post, and do not enough take my comment into consideration.
Now (present), I quit from my usual belief, and have stated from a viewpoint of the Trinity.
"Isa 9:6" and "John 20:28"?
So what?
From that viewpoint (Trinity), that "Jesus is God" (not "a god") is natural.
good to see all the thread on jesus recently :).
10 "you are my witnesses," declares the lord, .
"and my servant whom i have chosen, .
passwordprotected,
In my usual belief, the Scriptures is not teaching the doctrine.
I have said in this forum several times, "I interpret the Scriptures entirely symbolically and figuratively."
So, in fact, your belief cannot be supported with the Scriptures.
But, for you, I state in the viewpoint which is different from my usual belief.
All the followings are quotations from the NWT.
(Although it is quotation from the Old Testament, Jesus Christ is explaining those Scriptures.)
“The utterance of Jehovah to my Lord is:
“Sit at my right hand Until I place your enemies as a stool for your feet.””
PSALM 110:1http://www.watchtower.org/e/bible/ps/chapter_110.htm#bk1
“The spirit of the Sovereign Lord Jehovah is upon me,
for the reason that Jehovah has anointed me to tell good news to the meek ones.
He has sent me to bind up the brokenhearted,
to proclaim liberty to those taken captive and the wide opening [of the eyes] even to the prisoners;”
ISAIAH 61:1http://www.watchtower.org/e/bible/isa/chapter_061.htm#bk1
good to see all the thread on jesus recently :).
10 "you are my witnesses," declares the lord, .
"and my servant whom i have chosen, .
passwordprotected,
Were you influenced by the false Trinity doctrine, and forgotten the Scriptures you learned when you were a JW?
(Also in the Trinity doctrine, Jehovah is "the Father." And Jesus is not Jehovah.)
good to see all the thread on jesus recently :).
10 "you are my witnesses," declares the lord, .
"and my servant whom i have chosen, .
passwordprotected,
Usually, you write people's name after the mark "@."
When you write to me, what is the reason for not doing so?
Solid, scriptural proof please, bearing in mind Isaiah 9:6.
If you are an ex-Jehovah's Witness, even if I do not explain to you, you should know it.
good to see all the thread on jesus recently :).
10 "you are my witnesses," declares the lord, .
"and my servant whom i have chosen, .
It is the true Trinity doctrine that Jesus is not Jehovah.
Just the Trinitarians who teach that "Jesus is Jehovah" are teaching everybody the strawman.
It is that false Trinity doctrine (strawman, Jesus is Jehovah) that the Watch Tower society is attacking.
But the Watch Tower doctrine that Jehovah is "the Father" is correct.
http://www.karaite-korner.org/yhwh_2.pdf.
a very interesting paper.
i've only begun to read it.. i just finished watching this lecture.. http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/52_gordon.html.
Earnest,
At present, even if you describe the correct thing, I refuse it all.
First of all, the cause I got angry is you.
I have not a grudge to Mr. Narkissos.
Probably, "impossible" is a joke (humor).
good to see all the thread on jesus recently :).
10 "you are my witnesses," declares the lord, .
"and my servant whom i have chosen, .
Although I think that Ms. reniaa should have the correct understanding about the Trinity (Jesus is not Jehovah), I think that she is striving to answer everybody politely.
(She always says everybody "Hi, ...".
She is doing my advice.)
Probably, it is difficult to answer to two or more persons by oneself.
http://www.karaite-korner.org/yhwh_2.pdf.
a very interesting paper.
i've only begun to read it.. i just finished watching this lecture.. http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/52_gordon.html.
I am not opposed to the Christians and Jews who use the divine name (Tetragrammaton or Yahweh, Jehovah).
The translations which have restored the divine name are linked in my website.
I think that I mentioned that in this forum (JWD) repeatedly.
http://godpresencewithin.web.fc2.com/pages/link/link03.html
http://godpresencewithin.web.fc2.com/pages/link/link05.html
But even so, it is clear that there is no the divine name in the Greek manuscripts of the New Testament.
Even if we discuss the divine name in the LXX repeatedly, we cannot explain why the divine name is not included in the Greek manuscripts of the New Testament.
On the other hand, the divine name is included in the manuscripts of the Old Testament thousands of times.
(Incidentally, the LXX is the Old Testament of the Greek edition.)
possible
http://godpresencewithin.web.fc2.com/
http://www.karaite-korner.org/yhwh_2.pdf.
a very interesting paper.
i've only begun to read it.. i just finished watching this lecture.. http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/52_gordon.html.
TheOldHippie,
Possible-san, you are the rudest and most insane since the rape of Nanking.
Your comment is each absurd.
But you are not so foolish as Mr. Narkissos.
because you can write my name exactly.
I do not reply to you any longer.
I appreciate your advice. Thanks.
Probably, in this thread, people need your comment about the Tetragrammaton.