hooberus

Joined

• started 119 topics
• posted 2,517 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by hooberus

• 
  22

  Astonishing DNA complexity demolishes neo-Darwinism

  by hooberus in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  astonishing dna complexity demolishes neo-darwinism.

  paper by alex williams.

  http://creationontheweb.com/images/pdfs/tj/j21_3/j21_3_111-117.pdf.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hooberus

  This paper doesn't mention a single thing about androgenous retro-viruses. That is a vital part of "junk" DNA that they are supposedly proving is so active so as to negate Neo-Darwinism. Of course DNA serves a purpose, some DNA might actually be for extinct traits like you would see in the fetal stages. Regardless I don't see how this demolishes anything, the fact the writer went to so much detail explaining "junk" DNA and didn't mention androgenous retro-viruses tells me that either:

  a.) He purposely left them out in order to lie to me

  b.) He's ignorant of the subject

  If B is the case, he has no right to even write this paper as it's a fundemental property of "junk" DNA. This is a sad proposition indeed as a best case scenario is admitting that the writer is unqualified to write on the subject he had already written about. The worst case scenario is he's purposely misleading people to draw to his conclusion.

  Perhaps the paper never specifically discusses "androgenous [sic?] retro-viruses" because the (longer) principal referenced Nature "ENCODE" project paper itself didn't in its discussion of DNA. http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/ENCODE/nature05874.pdf

  Or perhaps they to:

  a.) Purposely left them out in order to lie to you

  b.) Are ignorant of the subject
• 
  22

  Astonishing DNA complexity demolishes neo-Darwinism

  by hooberus in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  astonishing dna complexity demolishes neo-darwinism.

  paper by alex williams.

  http://creationontheweb.com/images/pdfs/tj/j21_3/j21_3_111-117.pdf.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hooberus

  Astonishing DNA complexity demolishes neo-Darwinism
  Paper by Alex Williams

  http://creationontheweb.com/images/pdfs/tj/j21_3/j21_3_111-117.pdf

  "Human DNA is like a computer program but far, far more advanced than any software ever created." Bill Gates, The Road Ahead, Penguin Group, New York, p. 188, 1995.
• 
  77

  What are the greatest evidences that the deluge never happened?

  by Newborn in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  thanks for your help.. /newborn.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hooberus

  If someone made a list of "the greatest evidences that evolution never happened" and had never spent much time in the in the professional evolutionary literature on those points, they would be given stern lectures on "speaking on subjects without proper study" by the atheists /other evolutionists here.

  Yet when it comes to atheists/ evolutionists speaking on creationism and the flood . . .
• 
  77

  What are the greatest evidences that the deluge never happened?

  by Newborn in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  thanks for your help.. /newborn.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hooberus

  "Belief in the flood requires belief in hyper evolution:
  Even granting a highly impractical number of representative pairs of various
  "kinds" of animals, getting back up to the millions of current species requires
  a level of evolution many thousands of times faster than required by the theory
  of evolution, which Creationists reject as impossible."

  You people must not read much in the way of actual creationist literature.

  http://www.creationresearch.org/publications.htm
• 
  77

  What are the greatest evidences that the deluge never happened?

  by Newborn in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  thanks for your help.. /newborn.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hooberus
• 
  77

  What are the greatest evidences that the deluge never happened?

  by Newborn in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  thanks for your help.. /newborn.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hooberus

  http://www.creationresearch.org

  Surface and Subsurface Errors in Anti-Creationist Geology

  John K. Reed and John Woodmorappe

  CRSQ Vol 39 No 1 June 2002

  http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/notes/39/39_1/Note0206.htm
• 
  30

  The Book Evolutionists DON'T Want You To Read.

  by hooberus in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  the biotic message the book evolutionistsdon't want you to know about.available from http://www.creationresearch.org.

  http://saintpaulscience.com/contents.htm.

  prefacethe preface gives background about the book and its author.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hooberus

  Hooberus sees no point in wasting time on technical subjects with "such persons" as me and former posters on this board. However, he is the one that demonstrates the shallowest understanding in this debate, as he cannot even present the concepts on his own, all he does is engage in ad hominems, dodging the issue, and copy and pastes.

  BTS

  More precisely, http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/12/170038/3147992/post.ashx#3147992 "I see no reason to spend any more lengthy time on technical subjects with such persons (the previous two evolutionists were responed to in detail)."
• 
  30

  The Book Evolutionists DON'T Want You To Read.

  by hooberus in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  the biotic message the book evolutionistsdon't want you to know about.available from http://www.creationresearch.org.

  http://saintpaulscience.com/contents.htm.

  prefacethe preface gives background about the book and its author.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hooberus

  As a molecular biologist I can tell you this book's "science" is completely wrong, misleading and propagandistic.

  Thats what you said earlier, when you admitted that you hadn't actually read the book -but only the preface that was posted.

  http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/148600/2714534/post.ashx#2714534
• 
  30

  The Book Evolutionists DON'T Want You To Read.

  by hooberus in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  the biotic message the book evolutionistsdon't want you to know about.available from http://www.creationresearch.org.

  http://saintpaulscience.com/contents.htm.

  prefacethe preface gives background about the book and its author.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hooberus

  Anyone who is interested, be sure not to miss ReMine's 2006 CRSQ paper which references the above "1974 paper"

  I don't have the time to read the above link. Could you please explain in your own words?

  Sorry, but I've already spent more than enough of my time on the specific issue of ReMine's book and Haldane's dilemma here with evolutionists. Its the same pattern: 1. I recommend the book "The Biotic Message" 2. The evolutionists somehow come up with the sub-issue of haldane's dilemma 3. Then they (even though they have never yet read the book, or even heard of haldane's dilemma) proceed to speak confidently on the technical subject after only a few minutes "research". The evolutionist poster "Tetrapod.sapien" did it, http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/7/100588/1733596/post.ashx#1733596 the evolutionist poster "Abaddon" did it, http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/12/99116/1714811/post.ashx#1714811 and you did it. I see no reason to spend any more lengthy time on technical subjects with such persons (the previous two evolutionists were responed to in detail).
• 
  30

  The Book Evolutionists DON'T Want You To Read.

  by hooberus in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  the biotic message the book evolutionistsdon't want you to know about.available from http://www.creationresearch.org.

  http://saintpaulscience.com/contents.htm.

  prefacethe preface gives background about the book and its author.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  hooberus

  Anyone who is interested, be sure not to miss ReMine's 2006 CRSQ paper which references the above "1974 paper"

  http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/43/43_2/2006v43n2p111.pdf