Let’s not forget that Cofty has the burden of proof here (though he tries to shift it).
Furthermore he has not shown that naturalistic processes can even overcome the hurdle of likely obtaining even a single Cytochrome C molecule. See my post on page 24 of this thread.
For those who wanted sources:
What Cofty said:
"The number of possible amino acid sequences that would result in a functional Cytochrome C protein molecule has been calculated to be a billion times larger than all the atoms in the known universe."
The source:
Yockey, H. P. (1992) Information Theory and Molecular Biology. New York, Cambridge University Press.
The number of different possible functional versions of cyctochrome c sequences calculted by Yockey is staggering (2.3 x 10 ^93 ).
However, Yockeys calculations also show that when compared to the number of random possible sequences of the same length as cyctochrome c (110 amino acid length = 1.15 x 10^137 possible sequences) that functional cyctochrome c sequences are exceedingly rare.
The odds of obtaining even one of these by chance is 2.0 x 10 -44
Has any evolutionist demonstrated enough likely trials and time available on the Earth to likely obtain one functional cytochrome c sequence?
If naturalistic processes cannot reasonably generate Cytochrome C, then they cannot generate a pattern of it.