the old creation book had a lot to say about the fossil record.
if i remember correctly it was some lie about all the fossils ever found would fit on a single table.
the reality is that there is an embarrassment of riches illustrating the evolution of life.
Cofty, why don’t you tell us the estimated number of living species and the number of extant fossil species?
Then, if the number of extant fossil species is not 99 times the number of living species, please explain how the 99 % figure is obtained. Or just admit that you don’t know how it is obtained.
the old creation book had a lot to say about the fossil record.
if i remember correctly it was some lie about all the fossils ever found would fit on a single table.
the reality is that there is an embarrassment of riches illustrating the evolution of life.
The problem for the evolutionist claim “of 99 % of all species have gone extinct” is that the estimated number of living species vastly EXCEEDS the number of extant fossil species (by 20 times!).
So evolutionists would have to be employing a considerable amount of assumptions.
the old creation book had a lot to say about the fossil record.
if i remember correctly it was some lie about all the fossils ever found would fit on a single table.
the reality is that there is an embarrassment of riches illustrating the evolution of life.
I asked for direct evidence For the claim that 99 % of all animal species to ever walk the earth have disappeared.
the old creation book had a lot to say about the fossil record.
if i remember correctly it was some lie about all the fossils ever found would fit on a single table.
the reality is that there is an embarrassment of riches illustrating the evolution of life.
What convinced me of evolution is that 99% of all animal species to ever walk the earth have disappeared.
What is the direct evidence for this claim?
the popular berkeley evolution site (while responding to the misconception that evolution is just "a theory about the origin of life" does state:.
"evolutionary theory does encompass ideas and evidence regarding life's origins (e.g., whether or not it happened near a deep-sea vent, which organic molecules came first, etc.
), but this is not the central focus of evolutionary theory.
The popular Berkeley evolution site (while responding to the misconception that Evolution is just "a theory about the origin of life" does state:
"Evolutionary theory does encompass ideas and evidence regarding life's origins (e.g., whether or not it happened near a deep-sea vent, which organic molecules came first, etc.), but this is not the central focus of evolutionary theory. Most of evolutionary biology deals with how life changed after its origin. Regardless of how life started, afterwards it branched and diversified, and most studies of evolution are focused on those processes."
Note the words again:
"Evolutionary theory does encompass ideas and evidence regarding life's origins"
source: https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/misconceptions_teacherfaq.php#a1
evolution is how we got here.. demonstrate that you believe that all species evolved from a single cell over/within 3.5 billion years by tapping "like" below.. demonstrate that you believe in special creation by tapping "unlike" below..
Evolution is NOT atheism.
Without Evolution what are atheists left with to “explain” biological design, and complexity?
evolution is how we got here.. demonstrate that you believe that all species evolved from a single cell over/within 3.5 billion years by tapping "like" below.. demonstrate that you believe in special creation by tapping "unlike" below..
Cofty wrote:
I have posted 40 threads of evidence for evolution, every one of them entirely in my own words based on countless hours of research and backed up by peer-reviewed papers.
Its interesting how much your early threads parallel articles from the “talk origins” pro evolution site. You never credit talk origins in your opening thread posts.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/section4.html#protein_redundancy
Even some of the titles and order are similar:
“Protein functional redundancy” talk origins
(“Protein Finctional Redundancy”) Cofty
”DNA coding redundancy” talk origins
(“DNA Functional Redundancy”) Cofty
Your diagram for your ERV thread looks lifted from the talk origins article too.
No credit sited.
part 1 - protein functional redundancy.... part 2 - dna functional redundancy.... imagine you are teacher with suspicions that some of your pupils have been copying from each other.
comparing the correct answers in all of their assignments might not provide conclusive evidence.
they could simply claim they had all carefully revised the same textbooks so it shouldn't be surprising that they all gave the same answers.
Cofty claims that Evolution is a fact, and that each of his threads are lines of evidence unequivocally supporting his claims.
Therefore the burden of proof is on him.
Response to some Evolutionist claims on the subject of this thread.
https://www.icr.org/article/viral-genome-junk-bunk
If Cofty (or anyone else) disagrees they are free to carefully point out any reasons why.
part 1 - protein functional redundancy.... part 2 - dna functional redundancy.... imagine you are teacher with suspicions that some of your pupils have been copying from each other.
comparing the correct answers in all of their assignments might not provide conclusive evidence.
they could simply claim they had all carefully revised the same textbooks so it shouldn't be surprising that they all gave the same answers.
Response to some Evolutionist claims on this:
just before the last memorial, i finally had a witness call with an invite ( i say finally because i haven’t seen anyone in the d 2 d preaching work for going on 5 years!)..
i wasn’t particularly prepared ( it being early and me still in my nightie!
) but i managed to collect myself and said i didn’t think i wanted to go since i discovered the scandal around the un.....and i outlined the facts.. jw: oh no i don’t think so, where on earth did you read that?.
Question Stephanie:
Did the complexity of your post require a designer?
