Madjw"That is YOUR conclusion and opinion- which I have found to be false."
So do you care to substantiate just why you have found my statement to be false?
Here are a few examples of uncertainties in the Bible.
Where exactly was the garden of eden? (i'm sure you'll recall the question mark on the map at the back of the NWT)
Why does Bible Chronology point towards mankind being on earth for approximately 6000 years when all available evidence from all feilds shows mankind to have been here for more than 100,000 years at least?
Why does the Bible describe an earth wide flood 4000 years ago when there is no geological eveidence whatsoever of this?
Since there are extinct animals approximately 30,000-40,000 years old in some glaciers which themselves have been there far longer how does that fit in with the idea the earth used to be sub tropical globally as described in the Bible?
Where is the historical and archaeological evidence of 3million people leaving Egypt as described in the Bible book of exodus?
Who was melchizedek?
When do the "last days" begin?
What is the relevance of the "gentile times"?
What do all the Numbers in Revelation and Daniel mean?
I could go on.
The problem is organisations such as Jehovah's Witnesses either think they have all these answers or they just ignore any contrary evidence, preferring to believe solely in the Bible as though it has all the answers.
There is nothing wrong in having a faith or beleif in Jesus but this must be tempered with the fact that the source of what we know about his life and why he was meant to be here comes from a book with many unanswered questions and things we may never understand.
The fact there is a thread on this forum in 2010 so long after Jesus lived where people are arguing whether he is the same person as Michael surely more than adequately proves my point.
You ask who can you trust today?
I say trust yourself first and foremost and don't go into anything blind or if you are already part of something, choose to ignore relevant information.
Matt