Actually, out of the 376 offenders on that list:
Blacks = 133 offenders
White = 185 offenders
Hispanic = 57 offenders
So the answer to your question is YES.
you can now read the last words of executed offenders in texas.. how well do you know a person from what it is written?
follow this and test yourself:.
step 1: read the last statement first.
Actually, out of the 376 offenders on that list:
Blacks = 133 offenders
White = 185 offenders
Hispanic = 57 offenders
So the answer to your question is YES.
you can now read the last words of executed offenders in texas.. how well do you know a person from what it is written?
follow this and test yourself:.
step 1: read the last statement first.
Yeah, I know what you mean. Did you try it the way I described?
What did you feel about the person when you read his statement, and what did you feel about him after reading the crime and viewing his photograph?
you can now read the last words of executed offenders in texas.. how well do you know a person from what it is written?
follow this and test yourself:.
step 1: read the last statement first.
You can now read the last words of executed offenders in Texas.
How well do you know a person from what it is written? Follow this and test yourself:
STEP 1: Read the last statement first. (After reading what do you feel about the person?)
STEP 2: After this, then read the Offender Information where it describes his crime and has his picture.
I did this with many of these, and I felt a chilly sensation. Sometimes the words don't match the person at all when you compare it to their actions and photograph.
thirdwitness,.
my father, who sat on his first judicial committee when he was 17 and has been and "elder" ever since, couldn't provide scriptures to support some very basic teachings of jehovah's witnesses.
our current circuit overseer could not either.
I do see your point. I think there is a problem with the "if it's not in the scriptures you can't tell us to do it" reasoning. In the first century, the elders and apostles did or added certain things that were not previously in the scriptures. The letters from Paul are an example. I know you don't believe in it any longer, but reasoning that from a JW perspective, Jehovah has assigned the Faithful and Discreet Slave over all his interests on earth, then he would logically permit them or allow them the power to giver direction on things not exactly touched on by the scriptures.
That being said, I do see how it could get out of hand and how you could reason the way you do when you don't agree with their instructions.
thirdwitness,.
my father, who sat on his first judicial committee when he was 17 and has been and "elder" ever since, couldn't provide scriptures to support some very basic teachings of jehovah's witnesses.
our current circuit overseer could not either.
Finally-Free: No, not a coincidence. Give yourself an applause.
AuldSoul: Somethings might not be in the scriptures but they are common sence. For example: having accurate knowledge before baptism is just common sence. How can you make such an important and spiritual decision without having knowledge?
thirdwitness,.
my father, who sat on his first judicial committee when he was 17 and has been and "elder" ever since, couldn't provide scriptures to support some very basic teachings of jehovah's witnesses.
our current circuit overseer could not either.
I'm a bit confused about this thread.
Can you clarify? Are you questioning that Witnesses require baptism or why they require knowledge of the scriptures before being baptised?
a woman i work with is going to a class at her church on how to talk to jw's.
i told her one question to ask when they come knocking is if jesus is their mediator since most dubs don't know he isn't according to their own teachings.. any other simple questions one might ask?.
The question can be answered and the scriptures provided, but will you recognize the truth? Will you accept the answers or scuff at them? Will you ignore the answers because they don't conform with you? Will you discredit the one answering because to accept the answers would mean you have to accept to be wrong?
warning: some might find the descriptions here disturbing.
even though there is overwhelming evidence that jesus died on a cross and not an upright state, the organization still stubbornly clings to this feeble idea, siting of course, the ridiculous notion that, because the cross was a 'pagan symbol', jesus couldn't have died on it.
as if the romans gave a damn that the cross was pagan.
Interesting read, but...
This is why the convicts would get a nail hammered into their feet. Although it was painful, the person could support themselves on that nail (look up the size of nails used). After hours of suffering this way, the Roman custom was to break their legs so they could no longer support their bodies and thus as your medical journal points out, they would die faster.
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/12092006/140/irwin-backlash-stingrays-slaughtered.html.
at least 10 stingrays have been found dead and mutilated on australia's eastern coast since crocodile hunter steve irwin was killed by one of the animals last week.
the killings have prompted fears of "revenge attacks" against the normally docile fish.
Sounds like what apostates do. Blame all Witnesses because of what one or two have done to them.
Who are the real idiots now?
i came home today to find my wife crying whilst reading the 'when a loved one leaves jehovah' article.
its been a good few months now and i can appreciate how she feels.
but it just irritates me how my disagreeing with this religion has such a catastrophic effect on our everyday lives.
Read Luke 12: 51-53
Do you think that I have come to give peace in the earth? I tell you, no, but rather division.For from now on, there will be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three.They will be divided, father against son, and son against father; mother against daughter, and daughter against her mother; mother-in-law against her daughter-in-law, and daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law."