http://www.watchtower21.org/2011/02/will-humanity-bring-about-new-world.html.
will humanity bring about a new world order through government?.
the cia in the new world order: intelligence challenges through 2015. remarks by john c. gannon chairman, national intelligence council to the smithsonian associates "campus on the mall" .
Spade, I guess the answer to your rhetorical question is that only the Jehovah's Witnesses can bring about a "New World Order", whatever that means. Here's a foretaste of what it will be like:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH7j2TrjXUc&feature=related
Villabolo
hallo dear.
boys & girls, brothers & sisters and ladies & gentlemen!.
my name is sim the no-one and i live currently in eindhoven netherlands.. i am looking for those who want to live forever.. all jehovahs witness are logicly right persons though they are not persons.
Sim, are you selling life extension products?
Villabolo
http://www.watchtower21.org/2011/02/will-humanity-bring-about-new-world.html.
will humanity bring about a new world order through government?.
the cia in the new world order: intelligence challenges through 2015. remarks by john c. gannon chairman, national intelligence council to the smithsonian associates "campus on the mall" .
Outlaw: "Alice is a WBT$ Cheerleader for reasons no one knows.."
He must be one very sick...
Villabolo
http://www.watchtower21.org/2011/02/will-humanity-bring-about-new-world.html.
will humanity bring about a new world order through government?.
the cia in the new world order: intelligence challenges through 2015. remarks by john c. gannon chairman, national intelligence council to the smithsonian associates "campus on the mall" .
Somehow, I get the impression that Spade's elders would find his post to be very worldly in nature.
Villabolo
disproving the date 1914 as a significant year in bible prophecy is of great importance to some (e.g.
carl o. jonsson).
along with the meticulous details of bible and secular chronology, broadening one's horizons when assessing exactly what this date represents when compared against the 6000 years of human history likewise has merit.
Mary: "...Alice is drunk on Watchtower Kool-Aid.."
Shouldn't "drunk" read "high"? I heard it was a drug in that little bottle.
Villabolo
disproving the date 1914 as a significant year in bible prophecy is of great importance to some (e.g.
carl o. jonsson).
along with the meticulous details of bible and secular chronology, broadening one's horizons when assessing exactly what this date represents when compared against the 6000 years of human history likewise has merit.
How about starting with the logic of Matthew 24:36 that I just posted.
“No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. Matthew 24:36
Spade responding to Villabolo:
"There's still a logical time frame a person can look to, for understanding when Jehovah will take action on behalf of planet earth."
*************
"We may not know the day and the hour, but there is knowledge as to the time frame when these things will occur."
Ahhh, Spade. Is this "time frame"-a phrase soooo unmentioned in the Bible- an indirect way of stating that argument that goes "No one knows the day or the hour BUT the month and the year can be known"?
What would be the point of Jesus making that statement in the first place, when knowing the day or the hour means nothing unless the year is indicated in the first place?
Is that not like saying that the world will end on June 1 st OF SOME UNKNOWN YEAR???
Villabolo
disproving the date 1914 as a significant year in bible prophecy is of great importance to some (e.g.
carl o. jonsson).
along with the meticulous details of bible and secular chronology, broadening one's horizons when assessing exactly what this date represents when compared against the 6000 years of human history likewise has merit.
Black Sheep, now that you've decided to try and link these two forums, do you want me to destroy GiordanoBruno'sargument?
It's already been done on the other forum. Maybe Black Sheep can cut and paste Giordano Bruno's arguments. Better yet, let's click on the link you so thoughtfully provided and we can all go there and talk to him in person.
Still waiting for an answer to my next to last post.
Villabolo
disproving the date 1914 as a significant year in bible prophecy is of great importance to some (e.g.
carl o. jonsson).
along with the meticulous details of bible and secular chronology, broadening one's horizons when assessing exactly what this date represents when compared against the 6000 years of human history likewise has merit.
Spade:
"Does this joker ever provide a logical response to anything posted instead of going off topic and out on a limb making claims you can't back up."
How about starting with the logic of Matthew 24:36 that I just posted.
Also the logic in saying that Jonnson does not give a date on your pet peeve chronology issue does not mean that he is wrong. As I just said, the fact that someone does not have an answer to your question (assuming the question is valid) does not support your answer as being right.
It's like asking me to describe the color of your invisible pet elephant, with you claiming it's pink. Just because I do not give a color in response, does not mean that there is an invisible elephant of any color.
Villabolo
disproving the date 1914 as a significant year in bible prophecy is of great importance to some (e.g.
carl o. jonsson).
along with the meticulous details of bible and secular chronology, broadening one's horizons when assessing exactly what this date represents when compared against the 6000 years of human history likewise has merit.
Spade:
"You can call it strictly a matter of Watchtower interpretation if you choose, but after Carl Jonson's interpretation a person is left completely clueless as to when Jehovah will intervene and act on behalf of human society."
Duh! Could that be because of a willfully ignored and misunderstood (by some) Scripture that says:
36 “But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. Matthew 24:36 New International Version
Also, a lack of answer on someone's part does not mean that your answer is right. There is always the possibility that you're both wrong. Assuming your question is valid in the first place, which the scripture above shows that it's not.
Villabolo
disproving the date 1914 as a significant year in bible prophecy is of great importance to some (e.g.
carl o. jonsson).
along with the meticulous details of bible and secular chronology, broadening one's horizons when assessing exactly what this date represents when compared against the 6000 years of human history likewise has merit.
Round and round the merry-go-round!
Villabolo
